Role of Red Cell Distribution Width in Late-onset Preeclampsia: A Single-Center Experience

Wassan Nori, Zeena Raad Helmi, Alea Farhan Salman, Ban H. Hameed
{"title":"Role of Red Cell Distribution Width in Late-onset Preeclampsia: A Single-Center Experience","authors":"Wassan Nori, Zeena Raad Helmi, Alea Farhan Salman, Ban H. Hameed","doi":"10.33091/amj.2023.138711.1041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Red cell distribution width (RDW) is an inflammatory biomarker and a component of complete blood count that gains increased attention. Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a unique pregnancy syndrome for which inflammation was proposed for pathogenesis. Objectives: We aimed to examine RDW’s role in PE and explore confounders that limit its implication in practice. Materials and methods: A case-control study recruited 120 participants matched in body mass index (BMI) and gestational age into 3 subgroups; late-onset severe PE cases (30/120), late-onset non-severe PE cases (30/120), and healthy controls (60/120). Participants’ demographics (age, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, and DBP), hematological and biochemical parameters were evaluated. Results: RDW was significantly higher in PE cases (P-value < 0.01 ); In addition, RDW was positively correlated to SBP, DBP, and protein urea, r =0.5, r = 0.46, and r = 0.47 ; P-value < 0.0001, respectively. Liver enzymes, hemoglobin, and white blood cell count were all significantly linked to RDW (r = 0.27, P-value = 0.015), (r = 0.32, P-value = 0.005), (r = -0.27, P-value = 0.02) and (r = 0.39; P-value = 0.0004) respectively. Applying ROC Curve analysis showed that RDW cut-off value of > 14.4% discriminated PE cases from healthy controls (P-value < 0.001). At a cut-off value > 15.6% RDW distinguished severe from non-severe PE cases (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: RDW was significantly correlated to PE predictors and severity markers independent of gestational age and BMI. The ROC curve showed that RDW distinguished PE from healthy controls in addition to non-severe from severe PE cases with high sensitivity and specificity. Being an inexpensive, reliable test with good predictive and prognostic value warrants further studies for RDW’s role in PE screening and follow-up.","PeriodicalId":378741,"journal":{"name":"Al- Anbar Medical Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al- Anbar Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33091/amj.2023.138711.1041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Red cell distribution width (RDW) is an inflammatory biomarker and a component of complete blood count that gains increased attention. Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a unique pregnancy syndrome for which inflammation was proposed for pathogenesis. Objectives: We aimed to examine RDW’s role in PE and explore confounders that limit its implication in practice. Materials and methods: A case-control study recruited 120 participants matched in body mass index (BMI) and gestational age into 3 subgroups; late-onset severe PE cases (30/120), late-onset non-severe PE cases (30/120), and healthy controls (60/120). Participants’ demographics (age, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, and DBP), hematological and biochemical parameters were evaluated. Results: RDW was significantly higher in PE cases (P-value < 0.01 ); In addition, RDW was positively correlated to SBP, DBP, and protein urea, r =0.5, r = 0.46, and r = 0.47 ; P-value < 0.0001, respectively. Liver enzymes, hemoglobin, and white blood cell count were all significantly linked to RDW (r = 0.27, P-value = 0.015), (r = 0.32, P-value = 0.005), (r = -0.27, P-value = 0.02) and (r = 0.39; P-value = 0.0004) respectively. Applying ROC Curve analysis showed that RDW cut-off value of > 14.4% discriminated PE cases from healthy controls (P-value < 0.001). At a cut-off value > 15.6% RDW distinguished severe from non-severe PE cases (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: RDW was significantly correlated to PE predictors and severity markers independent of gestational age and BMI. The ROC curve showed that RDW distinguished PE from healthy controls in addition to non-severe from severe PE cases with high sensitivity and specificity. Being an inexpensive, reliable test with good predictive and prognostic value warrants further studies for RDW’s role in PE screening and follow-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红细胞分布宽度在迟发性子痫前期中的作用:单中心经验
背景:红细胞分布宽度(RDW)是一种炎症生物标志物,也是全血细胞计数的一个组成部分,越来越受到关注。先兆子痫(PE)是一种独特的妊娠综合征,炎症被认为是其发病机制。目的:我们旨在检查RDW在PE中的作用,并探索限制其在实践中的影响的混杂因素。材料与方法:病例对照研究招募体重指数(BMI)和胎龄匹配的120例受试者分为3个亚组;迟发性重度PE(30/120)、迟发性非重度PE(30/120)和健康对照(60/120)。评估参与者的人口统计学(年龄、BMI、收缩压和舒张压)、血液学和生化参数。结果:PE组RDW显著高于PE组(p值< 0.01);RDW与收缩压、舒张压、蛋白尿素呈正相关,分别为r =0.5、r = 0.46、r = 0.47;p值均< 0.0001。肝酶、血红蛋白和白细胞计数均与RDW (r = 0.27, p值= 0.015)、(r = 0.32, p值= 0.005)、(r = -0.27, p值= 0.02)和(r = 0.39;p值= 0.0004)。应用ROC曲线分析显示,RDW截断值> 14.4%将PE患者与健康对照区分开来(p值< 0.001)。在临界值> 15.6%时,RDW将严重PE与非严重PE区分开来(p值< 0.001)。结论:RDW与胎龄、BMI无关的PE预测指标及严重程度指标显著相关。ROC曲线显示,RDW区分PE与健康对照、非重度PE与重度PE具有较高的敏感性和特异性。RDW是一种廉价、可靠的检测方法,具有良好的预测和预后价值,值得进一步研究RDW在PE筛查和随访中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive Value of Resistin in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with and without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Acute Versus Chronic Telogen Hair Loss: A Review of the Knowledge and Recent Facts Metastatic Ovarian Tumor from Incidental Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review An Outbreak of Measles in Iraq Hypervirulent and the Multi-Drug Resistant Klebsiella oxytoca: A New Emerging Pathogen in Baghdad Hospitals, Iraq
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1