{"title":"ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS SCIENTIFIC CONSITENCY AND REPRESENTATION CONSISTENCY ON RECTILINEAR MOTION KINEMATICS MATERIAL GRADE X IN SMAN 8 PEKANBARU","authors":"Inike Paramita, Y. Yennita, Z Fakhruddin","doi":"10.31258/jgs.6.1.9-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study wasaimed to describe the level of student scientific consistency and representation consistency ofclass X SMA Negeri 8 Pekanbaru on rectilinear motion kinematisc material. The type of research was survey research. The subject of this research were 70 students. The data collection of this research used test, instrument of research used scientific consistency and representation consistency test the form of objektive matter which consist of 21 question wiht seven themes, each theme consist off three question with the same concept but presented in different representatiton. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data which showed the level of scientific consistency and representation consistency. The results showed that thepercentage of student at each scientific consistency level was 14.29% for consistent scientific, 20.00% for moderately consistent scientific and 65.71% for inconsistent scientific, while overall the students were at inconsistent levels for scientific consistency or that can be said they have no consistencyscientific. For representation consistency, the percentage ofstudents at each successive level was 17.14% for consistent representation, 28.57% for moderately consistent representation and 54.29% for inconsistent representation, while overall students were at moderately consistent representation level, mean that studentshave consistencyrepresentation.","PeriodicalId":232378,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Geliga Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Geliga Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31258/jgs.6.1.9-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study wasaimed to describe the level of student scientific consistency and representation consistency ofclass X SMA Negeri 8 Pekanbaru on rectilinear motion kinematisc material. The type of research was survey research. The subject of this research were 70 students. The data collection of this research used test, instrument of research used scientific consistency and representation consistency test the form of objektive matter which consist of 21 question wiht seven themes, each theme consist off three question with the same concept but presented in different representatiton. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data which showed the level of scientific consistency and representation consistency. The results showed that thepercentage of student at each scientific consistency level was 14.29% for consistent scientific, 20.00% for moderately consistent scientific and 65.71% for inconsistent scientific, while overall the students were at inconsistent levels for scientific consistency or that can be said they have no consistencyscientific. For representation consistency, the percentage ofstudents at each successive level was 17.14% for consistent representation, 28.57% for moderately consistent representation and 54.29% for inconsistent representation, while overall students were at moderately consistent representation level, mean that studentshave consistencyrepresentation.
本研究旨在描述X级SMA Negeri 8 Pekanbaru学生对直线运动运动学材料的科学一致性和表征一致性的水平。研究的类型是调查研究。这项研究的对象是70名学生。本研究的数据收集采用检验,研究工具采用科学一致性和表征一致性检验客观事物的形式,客观事物由7个主题的21个问题组成,每个主题由3个问题组成,这些问题具有相同的概念,但以不同的表征方式呈现。采用描述性分析对数据进行分析,显示科学一致性和表征一致性的水平。结果表明,学生在科学一致性水平上的比例为:科学一致性为14.29%,科学一致性为20.00%,科学一致性为65.71%,而学生在科学一致性水平上的比例总体上是不一致的,或者可以说他们没有科学一致性。在代表性一致性方面,每个连续水平的学生比例为:一致代表性为17.14%,中等一致代表性为28.57%,不一致代表性为54.29%,而总体学生处于中等一致代表性水平,意味着学生具有一致性代表性。