ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS SCIENTIFIC CONSITENCY AND REPRESENTATION CONSISTENCY ON RECTILINEAR MOTION KINEMATICS MATERIAL GRADE X IN SMAN 8 PEKANBARU

Inike Paramita, Y. Yennita, Z Fakhruddin
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS SCIENTIFIC CONSITENCY AND REPRESENTATION CONSISTENCY ON RECTILINEAR MOTION KINEMATICS MATERIAL GRADE X IN SMAN 8 PEKANBARU","authors":"Inike Paramita, Y. Yennita, Z Fakhruddin","doi":"10.31258/jgs.6.1.9-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study wasaimed to describe the level of student scientific consistency and representation consistency ofclass X SMA Negeri 8 Pekanbaru on rectilinear motion kinematisc material. The type of research was survey research. The subject of this research were 70 students. The data collection of this research used test, instrument of research used scientific consistency and representation consistency test the form of objektive matter which consist of 21 question wiht seven themes, each theme consist off three question with the same concept but presented in different representatiton. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data which showed the level of scientific consistency and representation consistency. The results showed that thepercentage of student at each scientific consistency level was 14.29% for consistent scientific, 20.00% for moderately consistent scientific and 65.71% for inconsistent scientific, while overall the students were at inconsistent levels for scientific consistency or that can be said they have no consistencyscientific. For representation consistency, the percentage ofstudents at each successive level was 17.14% for consistent representation, 28.57% for moderately consistent representation and 54.29% for inconsistent representation, while overall students were at moderately consistent representation level, mean that studentshave consistencyrepresentation.","PeriodicalId":232378,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Geliga Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Geliga Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31258/jgs.6.1.9-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study wasaimed to describe the level of student scientific consistency and representation consistency ofclass X SMA Negeri 8 Pekanbaru on rectilinear motion kinematisc material. The type of research was survey research. The subject of this research were 70 students. The data collection of this research used test, instrument of research used scientific consistency and representation consistency test the form of objektive matter which consist of 21 question wiht seven themes, each theme consist off three question with the same concept but presented in different representatiton. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data which showed the level of scientific consistency and representation consistency. The results showed that thepercentage of student at each scientific consistency level was 14.29% for consistent scientific, 20.00% for moderately consistent scientific and 65.71% for inconsistent scientific, while overall the students were at inconsistent levels for scientific consistency or that can be said they have no consistencyscientific. For representation consistency, the percentage ofstudents at each successive level was 17.14% for consistent representation, 28.57% for moderately consistent representation and 54.29% for inconsistent representation, while overall students were at moderately consistent representation level, mean that studentshave consistencyrepresentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动员八项竞走x级直线运动运动学材料科学性与表征一致性分析
本研究旨在描述X级SMA Negeri 8 Pekanbaru学生对直线运动运动学材料的科学一致性和表征一致性的水平。研究的类型是调查研究。这项研究的对象是70名学生。本研究的数据收集采用检验,研究工具采用科学一致性和表征一致性检验客观事物的形式,客观事物由7个主题的21个问题组成,每个主题由3个问题组成,这些问题具有相同的概念,但以不同的表征方式呈现。采用描述性分析对数据进行分析,显示科学一致性和表征一致性的水平。结果表明,学生在科学一致性水平上的比例为:科学一致性为14.29%,科学一致性为20.00%,科学一致性为65.71%,而学生在科学一致性水平上的比例总体上是不一致的,或者可以说他们没有科学一致性。在代表性一致性方面,每个连续水平的学生比例为:一致代表性为17.14%,中等一致代表性为28.57%,不一致代表性为54.29%,而总体学生处于中等一致代表性水平,意味着学生具有一致性代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Needs for E-Modules based Problem Based Learning on Renewable Energy Materials to Improve Creative Thinking Skills of SMA Negeri 1 Namang Students Interactive Multimedia Based on Cognitive Conflict to Improve Understanding of Student Concepts in Atomic Nucleus Materials Analysis of The Use of Zoom Cloud Meeting Application in Integrated Science Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic at Citra Bangsa Christian Junior High School Correlation Analysis of Learning Motivation with Cognitive Physics Learning Outcomes of High School Students on Static Fluids Profile of the Needs of Sriwijaya University Physics Education Students Against the Solar Observation Module
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1