Accomplishments and challenges of metrics for sustainable energy, population, and economics as illustrated through three countries

J. Engel-Cox, Andrew J. Chapman
{"title":"Accomplishments and challenges of metrics for sustainable energy, population, and economics as illustrated through three countries","authors":"J. Engel-Cox, Andrew J. Chapman","doi":"10.3389/fsuep.2023.1203520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global Sustainable Development Goals require meeting multiple objectives on energy, population, economics, and ecosystems. Development and economic growth as defined by current metrics requires energy inputs, yet energy growth can also increase negative impacts on natural systems. To achieve sustainable development goals, policymakers and technologists will need energy system solutions that consider not only cost and efficiency but also population, quality of life, natural ecosystems, and culture that accommodates different starting points and transition timelines of various countries. To explore possible approaches, this perspectives paper summarizes energy in the context of economic growth and population, illustrating concepts through the diverse status and direction of three countries—Japan, the United States, and Bangladesh—as potential views into a post-growth sustainable future. Four fundamental questions on long-term energy development are identified, related to optimal energy use per capita, sustainable global energy demand, managing an energy transition with stable population, and the need for generalizable approaches across countries.","PeriodicalId":262866,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2023.1203520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The global Sustainable Development Goals require meeting multiple objectives on energy, population, economics, and ecosystems. Development and economic growth as defined by current metrics requires energy inputs, yet energy growth can also increase negative impacts on natural systems. To achieve sustainable development goals, policymakers and technologists will need energy system solutions that consider not only cost and efficiency but also population, quality of life, natural ecosystems, and culture that accommodates different starting points and transition timelines of various countries. To explore possible approaches, this perspectives paper summarizes energy in the context of economic growth and population, illustrating concepts through the diverse status and direction of three countries—Japan, the United States, and Bangladesh—as potential views into a post-growth sustainable future. Four fundamental questions on long-term energy development are identified, related to optimal energy use per capita, sustainable global energy demand, managing an energy transition with stable population, and the need for generalizable approaches across countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以三个国家为例,说明可持续能源、人口和经济指标的成就和挑战
全球可持续发展目标要求实现能源、人口、经济和生态系统等多个目标。当前指标所定义的发展和经济增长需要能源投入,但能源增长也会增加对自然系统的负面影响。为了实现可持续发展目标,政策制定者和技术人员将需要能源系统解决方案,不仅要考虑成本和效率,还要考虑人口、生活质量、自然生态系统和文化,以适应不同国家的不同起点和过渡时间表。为了探索可能的方法,本文总结了经济增长和人口背景下的能源问题,并通过日本、美国和孟加拉国这三个国家不同的地位和发展方向阐述了能源概念,作为对增长后可持续未来的潜在看法。确定了关于长期能源发展的四个基本问题,涉及人均最佳能源使用、可持续的全球能源需求、在人口稳定的情况下管理能源转型,以及需要在各国采用可推广的办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the role of green finance in wind power development: using the nonparametric model Overview of high-power LED life prediction algorithms Impacts of non-residential solar on residential adoption decisions A bibliometric review of energy justice literature Linking energy policy, energy insecurity, and health outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1