The Value Systems of Incarcerated Embezzlers Compared to Other Inmates and the General Population.

M. Welch
{"title":"The Value Systems of Incarcerated Embezzlers Compared to Other Inmates and the General Population.","authors":"M. Welch","doi":"10.1300/J264V15N02_10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Rokeach Value Survey was used to assess the value systems of incarcerated embezzlers (N = 31) at a southwestern minimum security federal correctional institution. The responses of the embezzlers were compared to: (1) an inmate matched control group from the same institution (N = 31), (2) a sample of inmates incarcerated in state institutions (N = 461), and (3) a sample from the general population (N = 1409). The findings revealed no differences between the embezzlers and their matched control group. However, when compared to the general population, the embezzlers (and their matched control group) appeared more self-centered. It should be noted that among the other salient findings, the embezzlers and their matched control group resembled the general population more than the inmates from the state institutions. These results support the notion that inmates in minimum security institutions hold value systems which are closer to the general population than other groups of offenders. This is poss...","PeriodicalId":107632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of offender counseling, services & rehabilitation","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of offender counseling, services & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J264V15N02_10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The Rokeach Value Survey was used to assess the value systems of incarcerated embezzlers (N = 31) at a southwestern minimum security federal correctional institution. The responses of the embezzlers were compared to: (1) an inmate matched control group from the same institution (N = 31), (2) a sample of inmates incarcerated in state institutions (N = 461), and (3) a sample from the general population (N = 1409). The findings revealed no differences between the embezzlers and their matched control group. However, when compared to the general population, the embezzlers (and their matched control group) appeared more self-centered. It should be noted that among the other salient findings, the embezzlers and their matched control group resembled the general population more than the inmates from the state institutions. These results support the notion that inmates in minimum security institutions hold value systems which are closer to the general population than other groups of offenders. This is poss...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被监禁的贪污犯与其他囚犯和一般人群的价值体系比较。
摘要采用Rokeach价值观调查法对西南地区某最低安全级别联邦监狱服刑的31名贪污罪犯的价值体系进行评估。研究人员将这些贪贪者的回答与:(1)来自同一机构的囚犯匹配的对照组(N = 31),(2)在州立机构服刑的囚犯样本(N = 461),以及(3)来自一般人群的样本(N = 1409)进行了比较。调查结果显示,侵吞公款的人与对照组没有差异。然而,与一般人相比,侵吞公款的人(以及与他们匹配的对照组)显得更加以自我为中心。应该指出的是,在其他突出的发现中,贪污犯和他们对应的对照组比国家机构的囚犯更像一般人群。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即与其他罪犯群体相比,最低安全级别机构中的囚犯拥有更接近普通人群的价值体系。这是poss…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of the Criminal Justice System Certain Sociological Characteristic Differences in the Correctional Education Learners and the Public School Learners Library Services and Censorship in Corrections REFLECTIONS ON PENOLOGY A Proposed Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1