Recent Changes in the German Investment Screening Mechanism in Light of the EU Screening Regulation

Teoman M. Hagemeyer-Witzleb, S. Hindelang
{"title":"Recent Changes in the German Investment Screening Mechanism in Light of the EU Screening Regulation","authors":"Teoman M. Hagemeyer-Witzleb, S. Hindelang","doi":"10.47078/2021.2.39-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020 and 2021, the German investment screening laws, namely Außenwirtschaftsgesetz (AWG) and Außenwirtschaftsverordnung (AWV) were again subject to considerable reform induced by new legislation at the European level and a reshaped industry policy agenda at the national level. This article critically reviews the most significant changes brought about by one law (Erstes Gesetz zur Änderung des Außenwirtschaftsgesetzes und anderer Gesetze) and three ordinances (Fünfzehnte, Sechzehnte und Siebzente Verordnung zur Änderung der Außenwirtschaftsverordnung) and provides an overview of the reformed screening procedure. Although claims in this direction have been made, neither the reform nor the underlying Screening Regulation (EU) 2019/452 have altered the objective of review – the protection of public order or security – or bar for governmental intervention – actual and sufficiently serious danger. Both these were not ‘overwritten’ by secondary law and continue to be determined by the pertinent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Notwithstanding this, the reform has considerably widened the ‘sensitive sectors’ in which pertinent investments must be notified to and cleared by the authorities. ‘Gun jumping’ is prohibited and parties moving forward nonetheless risk criminal prosecution. Reform has also standardised the deadlines for governmental intervention and brought about procedural clarity. What the many and frequent changes reveal on a more fundamental level is a progressing politicisation and securitisation of investment screening law.","PeriodicalId":325719,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Comparative Law","volume":"538 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47078/2021.2.39-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020 and 2021, the German investment screening laws, namely Außenwirtschaftsgesetz (AWG) and Außenwirtschaftsverordnung (AWV) were again subject to considerable reform induced by new legislation at the European level and a reshaped industry policy agenda at the national level. This article critically reviews the most significant changes brought about by one law (Erstes Gesetz zur Änderung des Außenwirtschaftsgesetzes und anderer Gesetze) and three ordinances (Fünfzehnte, Sechzehnte und Siebzente Verordnung zur Änderung der Außenwirtschaftsverordnung) and provides an overview of the reformed screening procedure. Although claims in this direction have been made, neither the reform nor the underlying Screening Regulation (EU) 2019/452 have altered the objective of review – the protection of public order or security – or bar for governmental intervention – actual and sufficiently serious danger. Both these were not ‘overwritten’ by secondary law and continue to be determined by the pertinent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Notwithstanding this, the reform has considerably widened the ‘sensitive sectors’ in which pertinent investments must be notified to and cleared by the authorities. ‘Gun jumping’ is prohibited and parties moving forward nonetheless risk criminal prosecution. Reform has also standardised the deadlines for governmental intervention and brought about procedural clarity. What the many and frequent changes reveal on a more fundamental level is a progressing politicisation and securitisation of investment screening law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据欧盟审查条例,德国投资审查机制的最新变化
在2020年和2021年,德国投资审查法,即Außenwirtschaftsgesetz (AWG)和Außenwirtschaftsverordnung (AWV)再次受到欧洲层面新立法和国家层面重塑的行业政策议程的重大改革。本文对一项法律(Erstes Gesetz zur Änderung des Außenwirtschaftsgesetzes und anderer Gesetze)和三项法令(fnfzehnte、Sechzehnte和Siebzente Verordnung zur Änderung der Außenwirtschaftsverordnung)所带来的最重大变化进行了批判回顾,并对改革后的审查程序进行了概述。尽管已经提出了这方面的要求,但改革和潜在的审查条例(EU) 2019/452都没有改变审查的目标-保护公共秩序或安全-或禁止政府干预-实际和足够严重的危险。这两者都没有被二级法律“覆盖”,并继续由欧洲联盟法院的相关判例决定。尽管如此,改革大大扩大了“敏感部门”,相关投资必须通知当局并由当局批准。“跳枪”是被禁止的,尽管如此,当事人仍有被刑事起诉的风险。改革还规范了政府干预的最后期限,并使程序更加清晰。这些频繁的变化在更根本的层面上揭示出,投资审查法律正在逐步政治化和证券化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human Rights Committees Recommendations and their Position Within Slovak Legal Order Acquisition of Agricultural Land in the Czech Republic Right to Property and Cultural Heritage Protection in the Light of the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights Role of Private Law for Europe’s Digital Future Photographing People in Public and the Protection of Privacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1