Clinical Review: Best Medical Therapy Superior to Carotid Endarterectomy in Secondary Stroke Prevention in Symptomatic Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis of 50-69%

C. Blaine
{"title":"Clinical Review: Best Medical Therapy Superior to Carotid Endarterectomy in Secondary Stroke Prevention in Symptomatic Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis of 50-69%","authors":"C. Blaine","doi":"10.31031/aics.2020.02.000536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis poses a high risk of recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) after a TIA or minor stroke. Secondary prevention with carotid endarterectomy for high-grade stenosis between 70-99% has been well documented with large scale randomized controlled trials in both Europe and North America. The benefit of intermediate grade stenosis (50-69%) stenosis is not as clear and the present-day standard treatment guidelines do not favor surgery or best medical treatment. When the surgery trials were published in early 1990s, the medical therapy was not as clear or as aggressive. Over the past 20+ years, multimodality medical therapy has been strongly recommended in all stroke guidelines and significantly improved results of secondary prevention of 80-90% is achievable. This review will try to analyze the available data to provide the best treatment recommendation for patients with symptomatic extracranial internal carotid stenosis of 50-69%.","PeriodicalId":148950,"journal":{"name":"Advancements in Case Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advancements in Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/aics.2020.02.000536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis poses a high risk of recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) after a TIA or minor stroke. Secondary prevention with carotid endarterectomy for high-grade stenosis between 70-99% has been well documented with large scale randomized controlled trials in both Europe and North America. The benefit of intermediate grade stenosis (50-69%) stenosis is not as clear and the present-day standard treatment guidelines do not favor surgery or best medical treatment. When the surgery trials were published in early 1990s, the medical therapy was not as clear or as aggressive. Over the past 20+ years, multimodality medical therapy has been strongly recommended in all stroke guidelines and significantly improved results of secondary prevention of 80-90% is achievable. This review will try to analyze the available data to provide the best treatment recommendation for patients with symptomatic extracranial internal carotid stenosis of 50-69%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床回顾:最佳药物治疗在预防症状性颅外内颈动脉狭窄患者继发性卒中方面的效果优于颈动脉内膜切除术(50-69%)
颅外颈内动脉狭窄是复发性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或轻微卒中后的高风险。在欧洲和北美进行的大规模随机对照试验中,颈动脉内膜切除术对70-99%高度狭窄的二级预防有很好的证明。中度狭窄(50-69%)的益处尚不清楚,目前的标准治疗指南不赞成手术或最佳药物治疗。当手术试验在20世纪90年代初发表时,药物治疗并没有那么明确或积极。在过去的20多年里,多模式药物治疗在所有卒中指南中都被强烈推荐,二级预防的效果显著提高了80-90%。本综述将尝试分析现有数据,为症状性颅外颈内动脉狭窄患者提供50-69%的最佳治疗建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Orthorexia-Prevalence and Risk factors, Review of Literature Prevalence and Characteristics of Orthorexia Nervosa in a Sample of University Students in Poland The Impact of the Sars-Covid19 Pandemic on Multidrug Resistant Bacteria Colonization in Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of New Agents Allogeneic Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells: A Further Potential Weapon for Haematological Malignancies Guttate Psoriasis in Images, A Sign of Streptococcal Tonsillopharyngitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1