Parallel or Sequential? Platforms' Search-Pattern Preference: The Role of Assortment

Qingwei Jin, Lin Liu, Yi Yang
{"title":"Parallel or Sequential? Platforms' Search-Pattern Preference: The Role of Assortment","authors":"Qingwei Jin, Lin Liu, Yi Yang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3721973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem Definition: Many digital platforms provide a search environment for consumers to evaluate sellers' products. We investigate a strategic platform's preference in search pattern (parallel pattern or sequential pattern) to keep in check consumers' search behavior and sellers' price and assortment reactions. Academic/Practical Relevance: Although both parallel and sequential patterns are prevalent in the online shopping environment, few studies have considered the platform's preferences in these search patterns, and implications in relevant operations management problems---sellers' assortment decisions in our paper. Methodology: We use the multinomial logit choice model to analytically explore the platform's preference in search pattern in anticipation that a specific pattern will affect the interactions between consumers and sellers. Consumers optimally choose the number of sellers to visit and the amount of product attributes to evaluate, and sellers optimally choose their prices and assortment levels, with all decisions being affected by which pattern the platform selects. Results: In our benchmark model with exogenous assortment level, our results show that the platform prefers parallel (sequential) pattern when the search cost is small (large) or when the assortment level is high (low). However, when the assortment level is a decision, the platform's preference will be altered qualitatively; that is, the platform prefers parallel (sequential) pattern when the search cost is large (small). We have identified several novel effects that are built off the fundamental difference between parallel and sequential patterns and use them to explain the platform's search-pattern preference. Interestingly, our paper shows that the platform can strategically use operational means (assortment prevention effect) and marketing means (pricing prevention effect) to manipulate consumers' search to maximize its profit. Managerial Implications: Our analytical predictions are consistent with several interesting observations in practice and shed some light on how a strategic platform designs its search environment and monetizes assortment management service.","PeriodicalId":150569,"journal":{"name":"IO: Theory eJournal","volume":"265 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Theory eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3721973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem Definition: Many digital platforms provide a search environment for consumers to evaluate sellers' products. We investigate a strategic platform's preference in search pattern (parallel pattern or sequential pattern) to keep in check consumers' search behavior and sellers' price and assortment reactions. Academic/Practical Relevance: Although both parallel and sequential patterns are prevalent in the online shopping environment, few studies have considered the platform's preferences in these search patterns, and implications in relevant operations management problems---sellers' assortment decisions in our paper. Methodology: We use the multinomial logit choice model to analytically explore the platform's preference in search pattern in anticipation that a specific pattern will affect the interactions between consumers and sellers. Consumers optimally choose the number of sellers to visit and the amount of product attributes to evaluate, and sellers optimally choose their prices and assortment levels, with all decisions being affected by which pattern the platform selects. Results: In our benchmark model with exogenous assortment level, our results show that the platform prefers parallel (sequential) pattern when the search cost is small (large) or when the assortment level is high (low). However, when the assortment level is a decision, the platform's preference will be altered qualitatively; that is, the platform prefers parallel (sequential) pattern when the search cost is large (small). We have identified several novel effects that are built off the fundamental difference between parallel and sequential patterns and use them to explain the platform's search-pattern preference. Interestingly, our paper shows that the platform can strategically use operational means (assortment prevention effect) and marketing means (pricing prevention effect) to manipulate consumers' search to maximize its profit. Managerial Implications: Our analytical predictions are consistent with several interesting observations in practice and shed some light on how a strategic platform designs its search environment and monetizes assortment management service.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并行还是顺序?平台搜索模式偏好:分类的作用
问题定义:许多数字平台为消费者提供了一个评估卖家产品的搜索环境。我们研究了战略平台在搜索模式(并行模式或顺序模式)上的偏好,以检查消费者的搜索行为和卖家的价格和分类反应。学术/实际意义:尽管并行和顺序模式在网上购物环境中都很普遍,但很少有研究考虑到平台对这些搜索模式的偏好,以及在相关的运营管理问题中的影响——在我们的论文中,卖家的分类决策。方法:我们使用多项logit选择模型来分析探索平台对搜索模式的偏好,预期特定模式会影响消费者和卖家之间的互动。消费者最优地选择要访问的卖家数量和要评估的产品属性数量,卖家最优地选择他们的价格和分类水平,所有的决定都受到平台选择哪种模式的影响。结果:在外生分类水平的基准模型中,我们的结果表明,当搜索成本小(大)或分类水平高(低)时,平台更倾向于并行(顺序)模式。然而,当分类水平是一个决定时,平台的偏好将发生质的改变;也就是说,当搜索成本较大(较小)时,平台更倾向于并行(顺序)模式。我们已经确定了几个基于并行模式和顺序模式之间的根本区别的新效应,并用它们来解释平台的搜索模式偏好。有趣的是,我们的论文表明,平台可以策略性地使用运营手段(分类预防效应)和营销手段(价格预防效应)来操纵消费者的搜索,以实现其利润最大化。管理启示:我们的分析预测与实践中一些有趣的观察相一致,并揭示了战略平台如何设计其搜索环境并将分类管理服务货币化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gainers and Losers from Market Integration Price Authority under Competing Organizations Cash Hedging Motivates Information Sharing in Supply Chains Platform Competition and Interoperability: The Net Fee Model Risks and Global Supply Chains: What We Know and What We Need to Know
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1