Accelerating the Innovation Process: A Systematic Review and Realist Synthesis of the Research Literature

P. Ellwood, P. Grimshaw, K. Pandza
{"title":"Accelerating the Innovation Process: A Systematic Review and Realist Synthesis of the Research Literature","authors":"P. Ellwood, P. Grimshaw, K. Pandza","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is continued interest among academics, practitioners and policy‐makers in methods to achieve accelerated innovation. Academic studies of this complex phenomenon have succeeded in reaching a high degree of consensus on the antecedents of innovation speed. The aim in this review is to elucidate further the mechanisms underlying management interventions to promote speed. The review adopts a theory‐led, realist synthesis of innovation speed research – the first example of this methodology in management studies. The authors develop a new time‐based framework for categorizing the innovation‐speed literature. The framework has a CIMO logic, and is built by invoking the organizational studies literature on time. The authors contextualize the innovation‐speed literature in relation to the three generic temporal challenges faced by all organizations: reducing temporal uncertainty; resolving temporal conflicts over activities; and allocating resources amid conditions of temporal scarcity. They problematize extant explanations of innovation speed as not taking account of different temporal orientations (temporal dichotomies) within innovation work, and thereby neglecting a potential barrier to achieving accelerated innovation outcomes. They further draw on the literature on time in organizations to suggest new avenues of research, and methodological approaches new to the study of innovation speed. The principal contribution of this review is to offer a new conceptual perspective on the complex empirical research examining how innovation projects may be accelerated from original idea to launch.","PeriodicalId":114907,"journal":{"name":"Global Business Issues eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

There is continued interest among academics, practitioners and policy‐makers in methods to achieve accelerated innovation. Academic studies of this complex phenomenon have succeeded in reaching a high degree of consensus on the antecedents of innovation speed. The aim in this review is to elucidate further the mechanisms underlying management interventions to promote speed. The review adopts a theory‐led, realist synthesis of innovation speed research – the first example of this methodology in management studies. The authors develop a new time‐based framework for categorizing the innovation‐speed literature. The framework has a CIMO logic, and is built by invoking the organizational studies literature on time. The authors contextualize the innovation‐speed literature in relation to the three generic temporal challenges faced by all organizations: reducing temporal uncertainty; resolving temporal conflicts over activities; and allocating resources amid conditions of temporal scarcity. They problematize extant explanations of innovation speed as not taking account of different temporal orientations (temporal dichotomies) within innovation work, and thereby neglecting a potential barrier to achieving accelerated innovation outcomes. They further draw on the literature on time in organizations to suggest new avenues of research, and methodological approaches new to the study of innovation speed. The principal contribution of this review is to offer a new conceptual perspective on the complex empirical research examining how innovation projects may be accelerated from original idea to launch.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加速创新进程:研究文献的系统回顾与现实综合
学术界、实践者和政策制定者一直对加速创新的方法感兴趣。学术界对这一复杂现象的研究已经成功地就创新速度的前因达成了高度的共识。本文的目的是进一步阐明管理干预促进速度的机制。这篇综述采用了一种以理论为主导的、现实主义的创新速度研究的综合方法——这是管理研究中这种方法的第一个例子。作者开发了一个新的基于时间的框架来对创新速度文献进行分类。该框架具有CIMO逻辑,并通过及时调用组织研究文献来构建。作者将创新速度的相关文献与所有组织面临的三个普遍的时间挑战联系起来:减少时间不确定性;解决活动的时间冲突;在暂时稀缺的条件下分配资源。他们指出,现有的创新速度解释没有考虑到创新工作中的不同时间取向(时间二分法),从而忽视了实现加速创新成果的潜在障碍。他们进一步借鉴了有关组织时间的文献,提出了研究创新速度的新途径和新方法。本文的主要贡献是为复杂的实证研究提供了一个新的概念视角,以考察创新项目如何从最初的想法加速到启动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the Performance Puzzle of Digitalization: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms Korea’s Strategy on Trade Agreements with Developing Countries in Africa and the Pacific Regions The Impact of Human Resource Management Practice on Organizational Performance How Inductive and Deductive Generalization Shape the Guilt by Association Phenomenon Among Firms: Theory and Evidence The Role of National Culture in Financial Literacy: Cross-Country Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1