One Record or Two

Jean L. Hirons
{"title":"One Record or Two","authors":"Jean L. Hirons","doi":"10.1300/J141V01N02_02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The proliferation of online versions of printed publications during the spring of 1996 led a number of catalogers to question the necessity for creating separate catalog records. Many catalogers, frustrated with the lack of a multiple versions solution, favored finding a way to use the existing print records to notify patrons of the online version. CONSER catalogers, while recognizing their commitment to the national database, were equally interested in finding alternatives, and others expressed an interest in knowing what CONSER would do. In order to gather feedback for policy-setting, Hirons posted inquiries to various online discussion lists and a thoughtful and lively debate ensued. Hirons discusses the issues leading up to the discussion, factors of importance for CONSER, the interim guidelines that have been developed, and possible next steps.","PeriodicalId":421982,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Internet Cataloging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Internet Cataloging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J141V01N02_02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The proliferation of online versions of printed publications during the spring of 1996 led a number of catalogers to question the necessity for creating separate catalog records. Many catalogers, frustrated with the lack of a multiple versions solution, favored finding a way to use the existing print records to notify patrons of the online version. CONSER catalogers, while recognizing their commitment to the national database, were equally interested in finding alternatives, and others expressed an interest in knowing what CONSER would do. In order to gather feedback for policy-setting, Hirons posted inquiries to various online discussion lists and a thoughtful and lively debate ensued. Hirons discusses the issues leading up to the discussion, factors of importance for CONSER, the interim guidelines that have been developed, and possible next steps.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一张唱片还是两张
1996年春季印刷出版物在线版本的激增导致许多编目员质疑创建单独目录记录的必要性。许多编目人员对缺乏多版本解决方案感到沮丧,他们倾向于找到一种方法,利用现有的印刷记录来通知用户在线版本。CONSER编目员在认识到他们对国家数据库的承诺的同时,也同样对寻找替代方案感兴趣,其他人表示有兴趣知道CONSER将做什么。为了收集政策制定的反馈意见,Hirons在各种在线讨论列表上发布了询问,随后进行了一场深思熟虑的热烈辩论。Hirons讨论了导致讨论的问题、CONSER的重要因素、已制定的临时指导方针以及可能的后续步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growing Pains at REESWeb Reflections on Summarizing and Abstracting Gaining Independence with E-Print Archives and OAI Cataloging Internet Resources Scout Report Signpost
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1