The Euro Crisis and the Job Guarantee: A Proposal for Ireland

L. Randall Wray
{"title":"The Euro Crisis and the Job Guarantee: A Proposal for Ireland","authors":"L. Randall Wray","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2007283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Euroland is in a crisis that is slowly but surely spreading from one periphery country to another; it will eventually reach the center. The blame is mostly heaped upon supposedly profligate consumption by Mediterraneans. But that surely cannot apply to Ireland and Iceland. In both cases, these nations adopted the neoliberal attitude toward banks that was pushed by policymakers in Europe and America, with disastrous results. The banks blew up in a speculative fever and then expected their governments to absorb all the losses. The situation was similar in the United States, but in our case the debts were in dollars and our sovereign currency issuer simply spent, lent, and guaranteed 29 trillion dollars' worth of bad bank decisions. Even in our case it was a huge mistake—but it was \"affordable.\" Ireland and Iceland were not so lucky, as their bank debts were in \"foreign\" currencies. By this I mean that even though Irish bank debt was in euros, the Government of Ireland had given up its own currency in favor of what is essentially a foreign currency-the euro, which is issued by the European Central Bank (ECB). Every euro issued in Ireland is ultimately convertible, one to one, to an ECB euro. There is neither the possibility of depreciating the Irish euro nor the possibility of creating ECB euros as necessary to meet demands for clearing. Ireland is in a situation similar to that of Argentina a decade ago, when it adopted a currency board based on the US dollar. And yet the authorities demand more austerity, to further reduce growth rates. As both Ireland and Greece have found out, austerity does not mean reduced budget deficits, because tax revenues fall faster than spending can be cut. Indeed, as I write this, Athens has exploded in riots. Is there an alternative path? In this piece I argue that there is. First, I quickly summarize the financial foibles of Iceland and Ireland. I will then-also quickly-summarize the case for debt relief or default. Then I will present a program of direct job creation that could put Ireland on the path to recovery. Understanding the financial problems and solutions puts the jobs program proposal in the proper perspective: a full implementation of a job guarantee cannot occur within the current financial arrangements. Still, something can be done.","PeriodicalId":398400,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2007283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Euroland is in a crisis that is slowly but surely spreading from one periphery country to another; it will eventually reach the center. The blame is mostly heaped upon supposedly profligate consumption by Mediterraneans. But that surely cannot apply to Ireland and Iceland. In both cases, these nations adopted the neoliberal attitude toward banks that was pushed by policymakers in Europe and America, with disastrous results. The banks blew up in a speculative fever and then expected their governments to absorb all the losses. The situation was similar in the United States, but in our case the debts were in dollars and our sovereign currency issuer simply spent, lent, and guaranteed 29 trillion dollars' worth of bad bank decisions. Even in our case it was a huge mistake—but it was "affordable." Ireland and Iceland were not so lucky, as their bank debts were in "foreign" currencies. By this I mean that even though Irish bank debt was in euros, the Government of Ireland had given up its own currency in favor of what is essentially a foreign currency-the euro, which is issued by the European Central Bank (ECB). Every euro issued in Ireland is ultimately convertible, one to one, to an ECB euro. There is neither the possibility of depreciating the Irish euro nor the possibility of creating ECB euros as necessary to meet demands for clearing. Ireland is in a situation similar to that of Argentina a decade ago, when it adopted a currency board based on the US dollar. And yet the authorities demand more austerity, to further reduce growth rates. As both Ireland and Greece have found out, austerity does not mean reduced budget deficits, because tax revenues fall faster than spending can be cut. Indeed, as I write this, Athens has exploded in riots. Is there an alternative path? In this piece I argue that there is. First, I quickly summarize the financial foibles of Iceland and Ireland. I will then-also quickly-summarize the case for debt relief or default. Then I will present a program of direct job creation that could put Ireland on the path to recovery. Understanding the financial problems and solutions puts the jobs program proposal in the proper perspective: a full implementation of a job guarantee cannot occur within the current financial arrangements. Still, something can be done.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧元危机与就业保障:对爱尔兰的建议
欧元区正处于一场危机之中,这场危机正在缓慢但肯定地从一个外围国家蔓延到另一个;它最终会到达中心。这主要归咎于地中海人所谓的挥霍无度。但这肯定不适用于爱尔兰和冰岛。在这两种情况下,这些国家对欧洲和美国的政策制定者所推动的银行采取了新自由主义的态度,结果是灾难性的。银行在投机狂热中崩溃,然后指望政府来承担所有损失。美国的情况也类似,但我们的债务是以美元计价的,我们的主权货币发行者只是花费、放贷和担保了价值29万亿美元的银行坏账。即使在我们的情况下,这也是一个巨大的错误,但它是“负担得起的”。爱尔兰和冰岛就没那么幸运了,因为它们的银行债务都是“外币”。我的意思是,尽管爱尔兰银行的债务是以欧元计价的,但爱尔兰政府已经放弃了自己的货币,转而使用本质上是一种外币——由欧洲中央银行(ECB)发行的欧元。爱尔兰发行的每一欧元最终都可以兑换成欧洲央行的欧元。既不存在爱尔兰欧元贬值的可能性,也不存在创造必要的欧洲央行欧元以满足清算需求的可能性。爱尔兰目前的处境与10年前的阿根廷类似,当时阿根廷采用了以美元为基础的货币发行局。然而,当局要求更多的紧缩措施,以进一步降低增长率。正如爱尔兰和希腊所发现的那样,紧缩并不意味着削减预算赤字,因为税收收入的下降速度快于削减支出的速度。事实上,就在我写这篇文章的时候,雅典已经爆发了骚乱。还有其他的选择吗?在这篇文章中,我认为有。首先,我快速总结一下冰岛和爱尔兰的金融弱点。我将迅速总结一下债务减免或违约的理由。然后,我将提出一个直接创造就业机会的计划,使爱尔兰走上复苏之路。了解财政问题和解决办法,使就业计划提案处于正确的角度:在目前的财政安排下,就业保障的全面实施是不可能发生的。不过,还是有办法的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Firms’ Response to Macroeconomic Estimation Errors Expanded GDP for Welfare Measurement in the 21st Century An Analysis of Sustainability of Digital Economy in Select Member Countries of Asian Development Bank Why Comparative Advantage is a Problematic Guide to Practical Policy Transport Infrastructure, Growth and Persistence: The Rise and Demise of the Sui Canal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1