Comparing several GCD algorithms

T. Jebelean
{"title":"Comparing several GCD algorithms","authors":"T. Jebelean","doi":"10.1109/ARITH.1993.378094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The execution times of several algorithms for computing the GCD of arbitrary precision integers are compared. These algorithms are the known ones (Euclidean, binary, plus-minus), and the improved variants of these for multidigit computation (Lehmer and similar), as well as new algorithms introduced by the author: an improved Lehmer algorithm using two digits in partial consequence computation, and a generation of the binary algorithm using a new concept of modular conjugates. The last two algorithms prove to be the fastest of all, giving a speedup of six to eight times over the classical Euclidean scheme, and two times over the best currently known algorithms. Also, the generalized binary algorithm is suitable for systolic parallelization in a least-significant digits first pipelined manner.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":414758,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE 11th Symposium on Computer Arithmetic","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE 11th Symposium on Computer Arithmetic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARITH.1993.378094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

The execution times of several algorithms for computing the GCD of arbitrary precision integers are compared. These algorithms are the known ones (Euclidean, binary, plus-minus), and the improved variants of these for multidigit computation (Lehmer and similar), as well as new algorithms introduced by the author: an improved Lehmer algorithm using two digits in partial consequence computation, and a generation of the binary algorithm using a new concept of modular conjugates. The last two algorithms prove to be the fastest of all, giving a speedup of six to eight times over the classical Euclidean scheme, and two times over the best currently known algorithms. Also, the generalized binary algorithm is suitable for systolic parallelization in a least-significant digits first pipelined manner.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较几种GCD算法
比较了几种计算任意精度整数GCD的算法的执行时间。这些算法是已知的算法(欧几里得,二进制,正负),以及这些算法的改进变体(Lehmer和类似的),以及作者介绍的新算法:在部分结果计算中使用两位数的改进Lehmer算法,以及使用模共轭新概念的二进制算法的生成。最后两种算法被证明是所有算法中最快的,比经典的欧几里得方案加快了6到8倍,比目前已知的最好的算法快了2倍。此外,广义二进制算法适用于以最低有效数字优先的流水线方式进行收缩并行化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hardware starting approximation for the square root operation A modular multiplication algorithm with triangle additions Division with speculation of quotient digits Design of a fast validated dot product operation Exact rounding of certain elementary functions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1