A Comparative Study of Death as Understood in Korean Buddhism and Daesoon Jinrihoe: Focusing on the Concept of Reincarnation, Myeongbu, and the Ten Kings of the Afterworld

Dominik Rutana
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Death as Understood in Korean Buddhism and\n Daesoon Jinrihoe: Focusing on the Concept of Reincarnation,\n Myeongbu, and the Ten Kings of the\n Afterworld","authors":"Dominik Rutana","doi":"10.25050/jdaos.2022.40.0.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"◾ Abstract Religions The purpose of this study is to compare death the Korean Buddhist understanding of death with that of Daesoon Jinrihoe. Various concepts, including reincarnation ( 輪廻 ), myeongbu ( 冥府 , ‘the postmortem offices’ or ‘afterworld’) and the Ten Kings ( 十王 ) of the afterworld are used to explain views on death in both religions. However, these concepts differ not only in their content and categorization, but also in terms of the meaning they occupy within the doctrines of each religion. In other words, although many similarities can be found between Buddhism and Daesoon Jinrihoe’s concept of reincarnation, at the same time, differences between them can also be pointed out. The differences include the period of time between one’s death and reincarnation and also the importance of reliance upon other people or divine powers during the reincarnation process. With regard to ideas involving myŏngbu, there are far more differences than similarities. Both 185 and Daesoon Jinrihoe shares a similar notion of an afterlife judgment presided over by the Ten Kings. However, many differences can be found when it comes to Daesoon Jinrihoe other view of myŏngbu, known as ‘myeongbu gongsa (the Reordering Works of Myeongbu).’ These works are considered to be of great doctrinal importance in Daesoon Jinrihoe. Therefore, the concepts of reincarnation and myeongbu that appear in both traditions should not be considered identical and need to be redefined accordingly in comparative contexts. In other words, the concepts of reincarnation, myeongbu, and the Ten Kings as they appear in the Daesoon Thought should first be differentiated from their counterparts found in Buddhism and then be redefined in the context of the new and independent system of thought in which they exist. These concepts should then be applied to broader theoretical discourse on","PeriodicalId":115590,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25050/jdaos.2022.40.0.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

◾ Abstract Religions The purpose of this study is to compare death the Korean Buddhist understanding of death with that of Daesoon Jinrihoe. Various concepts, including reincarnation ( 輪廻 ), myeongbu ( 冥府 , ‘the postmortem offices’ or ‘afterworld’) and the Ten Kings ( 十王 ) of the afterworld are used to explain views on death in both religions. However, these concepts differ not only in their content and categorization, but also in terms of the meaning they occupy within the doctrines of each religion. In other words, although many similarities can be found between Buddhism and Daesoon Jinrihoe’s concept of reincarnation, at the same time, differences between them can also be pointed out. The differences include the period of time between one’s death and reincarnation and also the importance of reliance upon other people or divine powers during the reincarnation process. With regard to ideas involving myŏngbu, there are far more differences than similarities. Both 185 and Daesoon Jinrihoe shares a similar notion of an afterlife judgment presided over by the Ten Kings. However, many differences can be found when it comes to Daesoon Jinrihoe other view of myŏngbu, known as ‘myeongbu gongsa (the Reordering Works of Myeongbu).’ These works are considered to be of great doctrinal importance in Daesoon Jinrihoe. Therefore, the concepts of reincarnation and myeongbu that appear in both traditions should not be considered identical and need to be redefined accordingly in comparative contexts. In other words, the concepts of reincarnation, myeongbu, and the Ten Kings as they appear in the Daesoon Thought should first be differentiated from their counterparts found in Buddhism and then be redefined in the context of the new and independent system of thought in which they exist. These concepts should then be applied to broader theoretical discourse on
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国佛教与大宣真日会对死亡的理解之比较研究——以转世、明部和来世十王的概念为中心
◾摘要宗教本研究的目的是比较韩国佛教对死亡的理解与大宣真理会的理解。两种宗教都用各种概念来解释对死亡的看法,包括转世、来世和来世的十王。然而,这些概念不仅在内容和分类上有所不同,而且在它们在每个宗教教义中所占的意义上也有所不同。换句话说,佛教与大宣真日会的轮回观念虽然有许多相似之处,但也可以指出它们之间的差异。这种差异包括死亡和转世之间的时间间隔,以及在转世过程中依赖他人或神力的重要性。关于涉及myŏngbu的想法,差异远大于相似之处。《185》和《大宣真日会》都有类似的概念,即由十王主持来世的审判。但是,对于大宣真理会(myŏngbu)的另一种观点,也就是所谓的“明部公司”,却有很多不同的看法。这些作品在《大宣真理会》中被认为具有重要的教义意义。因此,在两种传统中出现的转世和明夫的概念不应该被认为是相同的,需要在比较的背景下相应地重新定义。换句话说,在大宣思想中出现的转世、明夫、十王等概念,首先应该与佛教中的概念区分开来,然后在它们存在的新的、独立的思想体系的背景下重新定义。这些概念应该应用于更广泛的理论论述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflecting on the Dilemma of Compulsory Spiritual Education in Public Education A Study on the Concept of ‘Loyalty and Filial Piety’ in the Taoist Scriptures The Educational Acceptance of Religion in Multicultural Society: Focused on Cooperative Religious Education A Study on Daesoon Jinrihoe’s Participation and Role in International Development Cooperations A Study on the Ontological Meaning of Life in The Canonical Scripture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1