Evolution of Mercosur intra-regional trade from 2016 to 2020

Luciana Aparecida Bastos, Jesus Crepaldi, Rodrigo Monteiro da Silva, Victor Hugo Bartolomeu de Araújo Bartolomeu de Araújo, Aline de Queiroz Pancera, B. Iqbal
{"title":"Evolution of Mercosur intra-regional trade from 2016 to 2020","authors":"Luciana Aparecida Bastos, Jesus Crepaldi, Rodrigo Monteiro da Silva, Victor Hugo Bartolomeu de Araújo Bartolomeu de Araújo, Aline de Queiroz Pancera, B. Iqbal","doi":"10.5354/0719-9368.2022.68979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first attempts at the Latin American integration process showed a highly pragmatic character, without many concerns for medium and long-term projects. The main concern was to expand intra and extra-regional trade. However, since the 1980s (the decade considered the lost decade for Latin America), when the external debt crises and the adjustment policies recommended by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) led the region to a higher poverty rate due to the social costs of such policies, Latin America has been rethinking its integration.\nThe creation of LAIA (Latin American Integration Association), in 1980, replacing LAFTA (Latin American Free Trade Association), in 1960, and its sub-regional integration have changed Latin America’s economic growth trajectory from the 1990s.\nWithin the scope of LAIA, Mercosur was created in 1991, with the objective of promoting intra and extra-regional trade expansion through the elimination of tariff barriers among its members, implementing a Common External Tariff. The full members of Mercosur are Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. The bloc also has associated members: Bolivia, Chile, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana and Suriname and observer members, namely Mexico and New Zealand. This work was developed to verify whether Mercosur, with the elimination of tariff barriers between full members and the Common External Tariff, has been able to meet its main objective, which is to expand intraregional trade among its members. Therefore, the main objective was to verify whether there was trade expansion between the bloc's full partners between the years 2016 and 2020.\nThe methodologies used for this purpose were descriptive statistics and literature review. Aiming to evaluate the annualized rate of change of trade in the period covered, it was decided to use the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), which is a differential of this research. The results showed that within the bloc, Brazil had Argentina as its main trading partner. It was observed that there was an expansion of intraregional trade between 2016 and 2018, followed by a considerable reduction of this trade during the period 2019-2020, but that Brazil still continued to be the member that obtained the largest intra-regional trade balances. Paraguay, in turn, did not show the same trend of commercial reduction for all other partners in 2019 and 2020. In addition, in 2020, even with the COVID 19 pandemic, Paraguay managed to increase its exports to Brazil and Argentina, showing a contrary trend only to their exports to Uruguay. Uruguay, in turn, expanded its imports from partners throughout the period, except for Paraguay in 2020, where its exports exceeded imports. With regard to Argentina, its exports to members began to fall in 2019 and increased in 2020, especially in relation to Brazil. The country also drastically reduced its imports from Brazil and Paraguay in 2019 and 2020, although it also considerably expanded imports from Paraguay","PeriodicalId":409959,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Trade Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Trade Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-9368.2022.68979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first attempts at the Latin American integration process showed a highly pragmatic character, without many concerns for medium and long-term projects. The main concern was to expand intra and extra-regional trade. However, since the 1980s (the decade considered the lost decade for Latin America), when the external debt crises and the adjustment policies recommended by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) led the region to a higher poverty rate due to the social costs of such policies, Latin America has been rethinking its integration. The creation of LAIA (Latin American Integration Association), in 1980, replacing LAFTA (Latin American Free Trade Association), in 1960, and its sub-regional integration have changed Latin America’s economic growth trajectory from the 1990s. Within the scope of LAIA, Mercosur was created in 1991, with the objective of promoting intra and extra-regional trade expansion through the elimination of tariff barriers among its members, implementing a Common External Tariff. The full members of Mercosur are Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. The bloc also has associated members: Bolivia, Chile, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana and Suriname and observer members, namely Mexico and New Zealand. This work was developed to verify whether Mercosur, with the elimination of tariff barriers between full members and the Common External Tariff, has been able to meet its main objective, which is to expand intraregional trade among its members. Therefore, the main objective was to verify whether there was trade expansion between the bloc's full partners between the years 2016 and 2020. The methodologies used for this purpose were descriptive statistics and literature review. Aiming to evaluate the annualized rate of change of trade in the period covered, it was decided to use the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), which is a differential of this research. The results showed that within the bloc, Brazil had Argentina as its main trading partner. It was observed that there was an expansion of intraregional trade between 2016 and 2018, followed by a considerable reduction of this trade during the period 2019-2020, but that Brazil still continued to be the member that obtained the largest intra-regional trade balances. Paraguay, in turn, did not show the same trend of commercial reduction for all other partners in 2019 and 2020. In addition, in 2020, even with the COVID 19 pandemic, Paraguay managed to increase its exports to Brazil and Argentina, showing a contrary trend only to their exports to Uruguay. Uruguay, in turn, expanded its imports from partners throughout the period, except for Paraguay in 2020, where its exports exceeded imports. With regard to Argentina, its exports to members began to fall in 2019 and increased in 2020, especially in relation to Brazil. The country also drastically reduced its imports from Brazil and Paraguay in 2019 and 2020, although it also considerably expanded imports from Paraguay
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2016 - 2020年南方共同市场区域内贸易演变
拉丁美洲一体化进程的第一次尝试显示出高度务实的特点,对中期和长期项目没有太多关注。主要关注的是扩大区域内和区域外贸易。然而,自20世纪80年代以来(该十年被认为是拉丁美洲失去的十年),外债危机和国际货币基金组织(IMF)建议的调整政策导致该地区由于这些政策的社会成本而导致贫困率上升,拉丁美洲一直在重新考虑其一体化。1980年拉丁美洲一体化协会(LAIA)取代1960年拉丁美洲自由贸易协会(LAFTA)的成立及其次区域一体化改变了20世纪90年代以来拉丁美洲的经济增长轨迹。南方共同市场于1991年在《区域贸易协定》的范围内成立,其目标是通过消除其成员之间的关税壁垒,执行共同对外关税,促进区域内和区域外贸易的扩大。南方共同市场的正式成员是阿根廷、巴西、巴拉圭和乌拉圭。该集团还有联邦国:玻利维亚、智利、秘鲁、哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔、圭亚那和苏里南,以及观察员国,即墨西哥和新西兰。开展这项工作是为了核查南方共同市场在消除了正式成员和共同对外关税之间的关税壁垒后,是否能够实现其主要目标,即扩大其成员之间的区域内贸易。因此,主要目标是验证2016年至2020年期间欧盟正式伙伴之间是否存在贸易扩张。用于此目的的方法是描述性统计和文献综述。为了评估所涵盖期间的年化贸易变化率,决定使用复合年增长率(CAGR),这是本研究的一个差异。结果显示,在欧盟内部,阿根廷是巴西的主要贸易伙伴。据观察,2016年至2018年期间,区域内贸易有所扩大,随后在2019年至2020年期间,这一贸易大幅减少,但巴西仍然是获得最大区域内贸易差额的成员。反过来,巴拉圭在2019年和2020年没有显示出所有其他伙伴的商业减少趋势。此外,2020年,即使在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,巴拉圭对巴西和阿根廷的出口仍有所增加,仅对乌拉圭的出口呈现相反的趋势。乌拉圭在此期间也扩大了从合作伙伴的进口,但巴拉圭在2020年除外,其出口超过进口。就阿根廷而言,其对成员国的出口在2019年开始下降,并在2020年有所增加,尤其是对巴西的出口。该国在2019年和2020年也大幅减少了从巴西和巴拉圭的进口,尽管它也大幅扩大了从巴拉圭的进口
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environmental Provisions in Trade Agreements Indirect Expropriation Clause Clarified in Recent Colombian BITs Export Diversification and Free Trade Agreements La Actividad Global en el marco de las Medidas de Salvaguardia en 2022: recuento a la luz de las notificaciones hechas al Comité de Salvaguardias de la OMC Visiones constitucionales de la Organización Mundial del Comercio: entre el desarrollo, el libre mercado y la marginalidad. El caso de Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1