Are Positive Reactions to Bad News Plausible? The Consideration of Fraud in Audit and Reporting Delays

Andrew Yim
{"title":"Are Positive Reactions to Bad News Plausible? The Consideration of Fraud in Audit and Reporting Delays","authors":"Andrew Yim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1551414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I formulate a model to emphasize the fraud detection role of auditors in the financial market and relate the role to audit and financial reporting delays. In the model, an auditor considers whether to perform extended audit procedures after observing a red flag generated from regular audit procedures. An audit delay is represented by the event of extending audit procedures and manifested as a financial reporting delay observed by the market. I derive a simple closed-form condition characterizing when a positive market reaction to a delay is possible. The condition provides a theoretical basis for formulating empirically testable hypotheses. I discuss why the fundamental logic behind the counter-intuitive positive-reaction result also applies to other contexts such as internal control weakness disclosure. Documented evidence in the literature suggests that “positive reactions to bad news” (PR2BN) is a general phenomenon. I also discuss other empirical implications of the model, with suggestions for regression equation specifications.","PeriodicalId":240153,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Corporate Reporting (Topic)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Corporate Reporting (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1551414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I formulate a model to emphasize the fraud detection role of auditors in the financial market and relate the role to audit and financial reporting delays. In the model, an auditor considers whether to perform extended audit procedures after observing a red flag generated from regular audit procedures. An audit delay is represented by the event of extending audit procedures and manifested as a financial reporting delay observed by the market. I derive a simple closed-form condition characterizing when a positive market reaction to a delay is possible. The condition provides a theoretical basis for formulating empirically testable hypotheses. I discuss why the fundamental logic behind the counter-intuitive positive-reaction result also applies to other contexts such as internal control weakness disclosure. Documented evidence in the literature suggests that “positive reactions to bad news” (PR2BN) is a general phenomenon. I also discuss other empirical implications of the model, with suggestions for regression equation specifications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对坏消息的积极反应可信吗?审计舞弊与报告延迟的考虑
我制定了一个模型来强调审计师在金融市场中的欺诈检测作用,并将其作用与审计和财务报告延迟联系起来。在该模型中,审计师在观察到常规审计过程产生的危险信号后,考虑是否执行扩展审计过程。审计延迟表现为审计程序延长的事件,并表现为市场观察到的财务报告延迟。我推导了一个简单的封闭条件,用来描述市场何时可能对延迟做出积极反应。这个条件为提出经验上可检验的假设提供了理论基础。我讨论了为什么反直觉的积极反应结果背后的基本逻辑也适用于其他情况,如内部控制弱点披露。文献中的证据表明,“对坏消息的积极反应”(pr20)是一种普遍现象。我还讨论了模型的其他经验含义,并对回归方程规范提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Earnings and Cash Flows as Predictors of Future Cash Flows Constrained by Accounting: Examining How Current Accounting Practice is Constraining the Net Zero Transition Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of the Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Empirical Evidence From Ghana The Agency of Greenwashing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1