Robust machine layout design under dynamic environment: Dynamic customer demand and machine maintenance

Srisatja Vitayasak , Pupong Pongcharoen , Christian Hicks
{"title":"Robust machine layout design under dynamic environment: Dynamic customer demand and machine maintenance","authors":"Srisatja Vitayasak ,&nbsp;Pupong Pongcharoen ,&nbsp;Christian Hicks","doi":"10.1016/j.eswax.2019.100015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The layout of manufacturing facilities has a large impact on manufacturing performance. The layout design process produces a block plan that shows the relative positioning of resources that can be developed into a detailed layout drawing. The total material handling distance is commonly used for measuring material flow. Manufacturing systems are subject to external and internal uncertainties including demand and machine breakdowns. Uncertainty and the rerouting of material flows have an impact on the material handling distance. No previous research has integrated robust machine layout design through multiple periods of dynamic demand with machine maintenance planning. This paper presents a robust machine layout design tool that minimises the material flow distance using a Genetic Algorithm (GA), taking into account demand uncertainty and machine maintenance. Experiments were conducted using eleven benchmark datasets that considered three scenarios: preventive maintenance (PM), corrective maintenance (CM) and both PM and CM. The results were analysed statistically. The effect of several maintenance scenarios including the ratio of the number of machines with period-based PM (PPM) to the number with production quantity-based PM (QPM), the percentage of machines with CM (%CM), and a combination of PMM/QPM ratios and %CM on material flow distance were examined. The results show that designing robust layouts considering maintenance resulted in shorter material flow distances. The distance was decreased by 30.91%, 9.8%, and 20.7% for the PM, CM, and both PM/CM scenarios, respectively. The PPM/QPM ratios, %CM, and a combination of PPM/QPM and %CM had significantly resulted in the material flow distance on almost all datasets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36838,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications: X","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.eswax.2019.100015","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590188519300150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The layout of manufacturing facilities has a large impact on manufacturing performance. The layout design process produces a block plan that shows the relative positioning of resources that can be developed into a detailed layout drawing. The total material handling distance is commonly used for measuring material flow. Manufacturing systems are subject to external and internal uncertainties including demand and machine breakdowns. Uncertainty and the rerouting of material flows have an impact on the material handling distance. No previous research has integrated robust machine layout design through multiple periods of dynamic demand with machine maintenance planning. This paper presents a robust machine layout design tool that minimises the material flow distance using a Genetic Algorithm (GA), taking into account demand uncertainty and machine maintenance. Experiments were conducted using eleven benchmark datasets that considered three scenarios: preventive maintenance (PM), corrective maintenance (CM) and both PM and CM. The results were analysed statistically. The effect of several maintenance scenarios including the ratio of the number of machines with period-based PM (PPM) to the number with production quantity-based PM (QPM), the percentage of machines with CM (%CM), and a combination of PMM/QPM ratios and %CM on material flow distance were examined. The results show that designing robust layouts considering maintenance resulted in shorter material flow distances. The distance was decreased by 30.91%, 9.8%, and 20.7% for the PM, CM, and both PM/CM scenarios, respectively. The PPM/QPM ratios, %CM, and a combination of PPM/QPM and %CM had significantly resulted in the material flow distance on almost all datasets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态环境下稳健的机器布局设计:动态的客户需求和机器维护
制造设施的布局对制造绩效有很大的影响。布局设计过程产生一个块平面图,显示资源的相对位置,可以发展成详细的布局图。物料搬运总距离通常用于测量物料流量。制造系统受制于外部和内部的不确定性,包括需求和机器故障。物料流的不确定性和改道对物料搬运距离有影响。将多周期动态需求的鲁棒机床布局设计与机床维护规划相结合的研究尚未在以往的研究中出现。本文提出了一种鲁棒的机器布局设计工具,该工具使用遗传算法(GA)最小化物料流距离,同时考虑到需求不确定性和机器维护。实验使用了11个基准数据集,考虑了三种场景:预防性维护(PM)、纠正性维护(CM)以及预防性维护和纠正性维护兼备。结果进行统计学分析。考察了几种维护方案对物料流距离的影响,包括基于周期的PM (PPM)的机器数量与基于生产数量的PM (QPM)的机器数量之比、基于CM的机器比例(%CM),以及PMM/QPM比率和%CM的组合。结果表明,考虑维护的稳健布局设计可以缩短物料流距离。PM、CM和PM/CM均减少了30.91%、9.8%和20.7%的距离。PPM/QPM比率、%CM以及PPM/QPM和%CM的组合对几乎所有数据集的物料流动距离都有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications: X
Expert Systems with Applications: X Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board GIMO: A multi-objective anytime rule mining system to ease iterative feedback from domain experts Editorial Board A review on deep learning methods for ECG arrhythmia classification Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1