An Improved Performance Simulated Annealing Based On Evolution Strategies for Single Objective Optimization Problems

V. Chutchavong, T. Pumee, S. Thongkrairat, T. Anuwongpinit
{"title":"An Improved Performance Simulated Annealing Based On Evolution Strategies for Single Objective Optimization Problems","authors":"V. Chutchavong, T. Pumee, S. Thongkrairat, T. Anuwongpinit","doi":"10.1109/iceast50382.2020.9165417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents solutions for single objective optimization problems with developed algorithm from simulated annealing based on a simple (μ + λ) -ES, It is divided into two algorithms, separated mutation (SM1) and survival mutation (SM2). After that, compared with randomized local search and simulated annealing. The test function is part of the IEEE WCCI 2020 on the topic of CEC-C2 single objective bound constrained optimization. This research has chosen the basic functions in the test such as Bent cigar function, rastrigin function, high conditioned elliptic function, HGBat function, rosenbrock’s function, griewank’s function, discus function, expanded schaffer’s function, weierstrass function, sphere function, natyas function, lévi function N.13, himmelblau’s function, and three-hump camel function. These functions are attract attention and competition. A results of SM1 and SM2 can solve single objective optimization problems better than RLS and SA. In high conditioned elliptic, The fitness value of RLS is equal to 3.96E-11, The fitness value of SA is equal to 8.12E-10, The fitness value of SM1 is equal to 5.39E-14 and The fitness value of SM2 is equal to 9.70E-15, It let us show the efficiency of SM2 that can get better results than SM1.","PeriodicalId":224375,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th International Conference on Engineering, Applied Sciences and Technology (ICEAST)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th International Conference on Engineering, Applied Sciences and Technology (ICEAST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iceast50382.2020.9165417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper presents solutions for single objective optimization problems with developed algorithm from simulated annealing based on a simple (μ + λ) -ES, It is divided into two algorithms, separated mutation (SM1) and survival mutation (SM2). After that, compared with randomized local search and simulated annealing. The test function is part of the IEEE WCCI 2020 on the topic of CEC-C2 single objective bound constrained optimization. This research has chosen the basic functions in the test such as Bent cigar function, rastrigin function, high conditioned elliptic function, HGBat function, rosenbrock’s function, griewank’s function, discus function, expanded schaffer’s function, weierstrass function, sphere function, natyas function, lévi function N.13, himmelblau’s function, and three-hump camel function. These functions are attract attention and competition. A results of SM1 and SM2 can solve single objective optimization problems better than RLS and SA. In high conditioned elliptic, The fitness value of RLS is equal to 3.96E-11, The fitness value of SA is equal to 8.12E-10, The fitness value of SM1 is equal to 5.39E-14 and The fitness value of SM2 is equal to 9.70E-15, It let us show the efficiency of SM2 that can get better results than SM1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于进化策略的单目标优化问题改进性能模拟退火
本文提出了基于简单(μ + λ) -ES的模拟退火算法求解单目标优化问题,该算法分为分离突变(SM1)和生存突变(SM2)两种算法。然后,将随机局部搜索和模拟退火进行比较。该测试函数是IEEE WCCI 2020关于CEC-C2单目标边界约束优化主题的一部分。本研究选取了实验中的基本函数,如Bent cigar函数、rastrigin函数、高条件椭圆函数、HGBat函数、rosenbrock函数、griewank函数、discus函数、expanded schaffer函数、weerstrass函数、sphere函数、natyas函数、lsamvi函数N.13、himmelblau函数、三驼峰骆驼函数。这些功能是吸引注意力和竞争。SM1和SM2的结果比RLS和SA更能解决单目标优化问题。在高条件椭圆中,RLS的适应度值为3.96E-11, SA的适应度值为8.12E-10, SM1的适应度值为5.39E-14, SM2的适应度值为9.70E-15,说明SM2的效率优于SM1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
5.8 GHz Wireless Localization Based Weighted Algorithm for Home Network Applications Deep Learning Technology for Drunks Detection with Infrared Camera ICEAST 2020 List Reviewers A Fast and Accurate Dielectric Response Measurement for Transformer Moisture Assessment and Remaining Life Estimation ICEAST 2020 Cover Page
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1