Evaluation of Intrasubject Parallelism in Balanced Ex Vivo Bioassay Using One-sided Efficient Score Tests of Slope Difference Quantile

H. Uehara
{"title":"Evaluation of Intrasubject Parallelism in Balanced Ex Vivo Bioassay Using One-sided Efficient Score Tests of Slope Difference Quantile","authors":"H. Uehara","doi":"10.5691/JJB.39.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a relative potency assessment, it is necessary to make assumptions about the similarities between substances and their dose-response profile. For example, in a parallel line bioassay which uses the dose-response data within the linear response range, we need to demonstrate that the dose-response slopes of the study substances are approximately parallel. When using multiple animals for testing, it is also crucial to confirm that this parallelism exists not only for the averages but also within each animal (Uehara et al. 2016a). Meanwhile, when applying a linear mixed effect model to the analysis of parallel line assays, the between-substance difference of the slopes can be treated as a random effect. Thus, under a balanced assay design, we can derive an efficient score test to assess the quantile of the slope difference (McCulloch et al. 2008), which enables us to determine whether the majority of animals have their slope difference within the acceptable range. We applied this approach to the assessment of intrasubject parallelism with the intention of ameliorating the conservatism of our previous method (Uehara et al. 2016b). We present an example that uses the proposed method, along with the results of simulation studies.","PeriodicalId":365545,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of biometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.39.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a relative potency assessment, it is necessary to make assumptions about the similarities between substances and their dose-response profile. For example, in a parallel line bioassay which uses the dose-response data within the linear response range, we need to demonstrate that the dose-response slopes of the study substances are approximately parallel. When using multiple animals for testing, it is also crucial to confirm that this parallelism exists not only for the averages but also within each animal (Uehara et al. 2016a). Meanwhile, when applying a linear mixed effect model to the analysis of parallel line assays, the between-substance difference of the slopes can be treated as a random effect. Thus, under a balanced assay design, we can derive an efficient score test to assess the quantile of the slope difference (McCulloch et al. 2008), which enables us to determine whether the majority of animals have their slope difference within the acceptable range. We applied this approach to the assessment of intrasubject parallelism with the intention of ameliorating the conservatism of our previous method (Uehara et al. 2016b). We present an example that uses the proposed method, along with the results of simulation studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用斜率差分位数的单侧有效评分检验评价平衡离体生物测定中受试者内平行度
在相对效价评估中,有必要对物质之间的相似性及其剂量反应谱作出假设。例如,在使用线性响应范围内的剂量-反应数据的平行线生物测定中,我们需要证明研究物质的剂量-反应斜率近似平行。当使用多个动物进行测试时,同样重要的是要确认这种并行性不仅存在于平均值,而且存在于每个动物内部(Uehara et al. 2016a)。同时,将线性混合效应模型应用于平行线试验分析时,边坡的物质间差异可视为随机效应。因此,在平衡试验设计下,我们可以推导出一种有效的评分测试来评估坡度差异的分位数(McCulloch et al. 2008),这使我们能够确定大多数动物的坡度差异是否在可接受的范围内。我们将这种方法应用于评估主体内并行性,目的是改善我们之前方法的保守性(Uehara et al. 2016b)。我们给出了一个使用所提出的方法的例子,以及仿真研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meta-Analysis for Time-to-event Outcome Based on Restored Individual Participant Data and Summary Statistics Theoretical Examination and Simulation Study on Analyses for Progression Free Survival as Interval-censored Data がん臨床試験と競合リスク・マルチステートモデル Robust and Interpretable Hazard-based Summary Measures of the Magnitude of the Treatment Effect and Their Inference Procedures Bayesian Ridge Estimators Based on Copula-based Joint Prior Distributions: Cox Regression Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1