Classification situations: Life-chances in the neoliberal era

M. Fourcade, Kieran Healy
{"title":"Classification situations: Life-chances in the neoliberal era","authors":"M. Fourcade, Kieran Healy","doi":"10.12759/hsr.42.2017.1.23-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the stratifying effects of economic classifications. We argue that in the neoliberal era market institutions increasingly use actuarial techniques to split and sort individuals into classification situations that shape life-chances. While this is a general and increasingly pervasive process, our main empirical illustration comes from the transformation of the credit market in the United States. This market works as both as a leveling force and as a condenser of new forms of social difference. The U.S. banking and credit system has greatly broadened its scope over the past twenty years to incorporate previously excluded groups. We observe this leveling tendency in the expansion of credit amongst lower-income households, the systematization of overdraft protections, and the unexpected and rapid growth of the fringe banking sector. But while access to credit has democratized, it has also differentiated. Scoring technologies classify and price people according to credit risk. This has allowed multiple new distinctions to be made amongst the creditworthy, as scores get attached to different interest rates and loan structures. Scores have also expanded into markets beyond consumer credit, such as insurance, real estate, employment, and elsewhere. The result is a cumulative pattern of advantage and disadvantage with both objectively measured and subjectively experienced aspects. We argue these private classificatory tools are increasingly central to the generation of ‘‘market-situations’’, and thus an important and overlooked force that structures individual life-chances. In short, classification situations may have become the engine of modern class situations. 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.","PeriodicalId":325508,"journal":{"name":"Sciences Po publications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"319","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sciences Po publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.42.2017.1.23-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 319

Abstract

This article examines the stratifying effects of economic classifications. We argue that in the neoliberal era market institutions increasingly use actuarial techniques to split and sort individuals into classification situations that shape life-chances. While this is a general and increasingly pervasive process, our main empirical illustration comes from the transformation of the credit market in the United States. This market works as both as a leveling force and as a condenser of new forms of social difference. The U.S. banking and credit system has greatly broadened its scope over the past twenty years to incorporate previously excluded groups. We observe this leveling tendency in the expansion of credit amongst lower-income households, the systematization of overdraft protections, and the unexpected and rapid growth of the fringe banking sector. But while access to credit has democratized, it has also differentiated. Scoring technologies classify and price people according to credit risk. This has allowed multiple new distinctions to be made amongst the creditworthy, as scores get attached to different interest rates and loan structures. Scores have also expanded into markets beyond consumer credit, such as insurance, real estate, employment, and elsewhere. The result is a cumulative pattern of advantage and disadvantage with both objectively measured and subjectively experienced aspects. We argue these private classificatory tools are increasingly central to the generation of ‘‘market-situations’’, and thus an important and overlooked force that structures individual life-chances. In short, classification situations may have become the engine of modern class situations. 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分类情境:新自由主义时代的生活机会
本文考察了经济分类的分层效应。我们认为,在新自由主义时代,市场机构越来越多地使用精算技术,将个人划分为影响生活机会的分类情况。虽然这是一个普遍且日益普遍的过程,但我们主要的实证例证来自美国信贷市场的转型。这个市场既是一种平衡力量,也是新形式的社会差异的聚结物。在过去的二十年里,美国的银行和信贷体系大大扩大了其范围,吸纳了以前被排除在外的群体。我们在低收入家庭的信贷扩张、透支保护的系统化以及边缘银行业出人意料的快速增长中观察到这种平衡趋势。但是,尽管获得信贷的途径已经民主化,但它也出现了分化。评分技术根据信用风险对人进行分类和定价。这使得信用等级之间产生了多种新的区别,因为分数与不同的利率和贷款结构有关。分数还扩展到消费信贷以外的市场,如保险、房地产、就业和其他领域。其结果是一种优势和劣势的累积模式,既有客观衡量的方面,也有主观体验的方面。我们认为,这些私人分类工具对“市场情况”的产生越来越重要,因此是构建个人生活机会的重要而被忽视的力量。简而言之,分类情境可能已经成为现代阶级情境的引擎。2013年Elsevier Ltd.出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
APP vs PEPP: Similar, But With Different Rationales Biased Aspirations and Social Inequality at School: Evidence from French Teenagers Setting New Priorities for the ECB’s Mandate Working during COVID-19 Hétérogénéité des agents, interconnexions financières et politique monétaire : une approche non conventionnelle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1