Microfiltration Membrane Assisted CO2 Diffuser for Algae Cultivation

U. A. M. I. Lutfi, S. M. Hizam, K. S. Lau, N. Nordin, M. Bilad, Z. Putra, M. D. H. Wirzal
{"title":"Microfiltration Membrane Assisted CO2 Diffuser for Algae Cultivation","authors":"U. A. M. I. Lutfi, S. M. Hizam, K. S. Lau, N. Nordin, M. Bilad, Z. Putra, M. D. H. Wirzal","doi":"10.11113/AMST.V22N1.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to cover on the feasibility of using algae as an alternative to capture CO2. As such, comparison between a membrane diffuser and a bubble diffuser in terms of its performance in the cultivation of algae has been made. This work utilized PVDF flat sheet membrane with only air and pure CO2 as the feed gas and the diffusion method used was compared between membrane diffuser and a bubble diffuser. In the experiment, the feed gas flows through the membrane diffuser in which the algae suspension utilized the CO2 for its growth. The biomass contents of four different samples have been determined using the dry weight of the algae suspension samples, which is obtained by drying the samples in an oven overnight at 105˚C. The algae suspension with the membrane diffuser was able to remove CO2 feasibly while showing better performance with respect to algae cultivation in comparison to the bubble diffuser. Results showed the maximum average biomass content of the samples that used membrane diffuser had higher value of 0.325 g/L when a 1:1 ratio of air and CO2 was used in the feed stream and 0.275 g/L when using pure air as the feed stream. Thus, it has been shown that membrane diffuser is better than a bubble diffuser owing to its larger effective surface area.","PeriodicalId":326334,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Membrane Science & Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Membrane Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/AMST.V22N1.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to cover on the feasibility of using algae as an alternative to capture CO2. As such, comparison between a membrane diffuser and a bubble diffuser in terms of its performance in the cultivation of algae has been made. This work utilized PVDF flat sheet membrane with only air and pure CO2 as the feed gas and the diffusion method used was compared between membrane diffuser and a bubble diffuser. In the experiment, the feed gas flows through the membrane diffuser in which the algae suspension utilized the CO2 for its growth. The biomass contents of four different samples have been determined using the dry weight of the algae suspension samples, which is obtained by drying the samples in an oven overnight at 105˚C. The algae suspension with the membrane diffuser was able to remove CO2 feasibly while showing better performance with respect to algae cultivation in comparison to the bubble diffuser. Results showed the maximum average biomass content of the samples that used membrane diffuser had higher value of 0.325 g/L when a 1:1 ratio of air and CO2 was used in the feed stream and 0.275 g/L when using pure air as the feed stream. Thus, it has been shown that membrane diffuser is better than a bubble diffuser owing to its larger effective surface area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微滤膜辅助CO2扩散器用于藻类培养
本文的目的是探讨利用藻类作为捕获二氧化碳的替代品的可行性。因此,对膜扩散器和气泡扩散器在藻类培养中的性能进行了比较。本文采用PVDF平板膜,仅以空气和纯CO2为原料气,对膜扩散器和气泡扩散器的扩散方式进行了比较。在实验中,原料气流经膜扩散器,藻类悬浮液在膜扩散器中利用CO2生长。利用藻类悬浮液样品的干重测定了四种不同样品的生物量含量,干重是通过将样品在105˚C的烤箱中干燥过夜获得的。与气泡扩散器相比,膜扩散器对藻类悬浮液的CO2去除效果更好,对藻类的培养效果也更好。结果表明,采用膜扩散器的样品,在以1:1的空气与CO2为进料流时,其最大平均生物量为0.325 g/L,而在以纯空气为进料流时,其最大平均生物量为0.275 g/L。因此,由于膜扩散器的有效表面积更大,因此膜扩散器优于气泡扩散器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent Progress on Tailoring and Modification of Membranes for Membrane Distillation: A Review The Future Challenges of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) for High Strength Wastewater Mathematical Modeling of Extraction of Neodymium using Pseudo-emulsion based Hollow Fiber Strip Dispersion (PEHFSD) Grand Challenges of Perovskite and Metal Oxide-based Membrane: A Form of Dual-layer Hollow Fibre Clay Ceramic Support Membrane Optimization Using Factorial Design Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1