Low-Dose Dopamine in the Management of Intradialysis Hypotension: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Nigeria

P. Uduagbamen, M. Ogunmola, Igwebuike Nwogbe, T. Falana
{"title":"Low-Dose Dopamine in the Management of Intradialysis Hypotension: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Nigeria","authors":"P. Uduagbamen, M. Ogunmola, Igwebuike Nwogbe, T. Falana","doi":"10.33590/emjnephrol/22-00073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) still remains a common finding in maintenance haemodialysis despite improvements in dialysis delivery. Measures are needed to minimise some aftermath of IDH like dialysis termination, which can impact poorly on dialysis outcome.\n\nMethods: This retrospective study assessed IDH in a low-income setting, and compared two cohorts of IDH with and without dopamine treatment.\n\nResults: Of the 416 participants, 92 (22.1%) had at least an episode of symptomatic IDH. Of these, 20 (21.7%) were treated with dopamine. Of the 2,205 sessions, 468 (21.2%) had symptomatic IDH, of which 63 (13.4%) with severe IDH were treated with dopamine. The mean age of all participants and dopamine treatment participants were 50.8 ± 9.3 years and 64.6 ± 9.5 years, respectively (P=0.001). Blood pressure (BP) reductions following dialysis were more with females (P=0.04). Dialysis dose was adequate in 7.9% and 4.2% of sessions with and without dopamine (P<0.001). Improvements in glomerular filtration rate were greater in dopamine-treated sessions (P=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively). Fewer anti-hypertensives (aOR: 14.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.88–20.41), low predialysis systolic (aOR:5.59; 95% CI: 3.88–9.41), and diastolic blood pressure (aOR: 5.78; 95% CI: 4.06-9.81) were independently associated with dopamine-treated sessions.\n\nConclusion: IDH was found in 21.2% of dialysis sessions. 13.4% with severe IDH had dopamine treatment. Participants with dopamine-treated sessions had fewer dialysis terminations and hospitalisations, and dopamine treatment improved the prescribed dialysis and gave higher dialysis doses. Considering the economic effects of dialysis termination in low-income nations, intradialytic dopamine could be very beneficial.","PeriodicalId":348431,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Nephrology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjnephrol/22-00073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) still remains a common finding in maintenance haemodialysis despite improvements in dialysis delivery. Measures are needed to minimise some aftermath of IDH like dialysis termination, which can impact poorly on dialysis outcome. Methods: This retrospective study assessed IDH in a low-income setting, and compared two cohorts of IDH with and without dopamine treatment. Results: Of the 416 participants, 92 (22.1%) had at least an episode of symptomatic IDH. Of these, 20 (21.7%) were treated with dopamine. Of the 2,205 sessions, 468 (21.2%) had symptomatic IDH, of which 63 (13.4%) with severe IDH were treated with dopamine. The mean age of all participants and dopamine treatment participants were 50.8 ± 9.3 years and 64.6 ± 9.5 years, respectively (P=0.001). Blood pressure (BP) reductions following dialysis were more with females (P=0.04). Dialysis dose was adequate in 7.9% and 4.2% of sessions with and without dopamine (P<0.001). Improvements in glomerular filtration rate were greater in dopamine-treated sessions (P=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively). Fewer anti-hypertensives (aOR: 14.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.88–20.41), low predialysis systolic (aOR:5.59; 95% CI: 3.88–9.41), and diastolic blood pressure (aOR: 5.78; 95% CI: 4.06-9.81) were independently associated with dopamine-treated sessions. Conclusion: IDH was found in 21.2% of dialysis sessions. 13.4% with severe IDH had dopamine treatment. Participants with dopamine-treated sessions had fewer dialysis terminations and hospitalisations, and dopamine treatment improved the prescribed dialysis and gave higher dialysis doses. Considering the economic effects of dialysis termination in low-income nations, intradialytic dopamine could be very beneficial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低剂量多巴胺治疗分析内低血压:尼日利亚回顾性队列研究
导语:尽管透析输送有所改善,但在维持性血液透析中,分析性低血压(IDH)仍然是一个常见的发现。需要采取措施尽量减少IDH的一些后果,如终止透析,这可能对透析结果产生不良影响。方法:这项回顾性研究评估了低收入背景下的IDH,并比较了两组接受和未接受多巴胺治疗的IDH。结果:在416名参与者中,92名(22.1%)至少有一次症状性IDH发作。其中,20例(21.7%)接受多巴胺治疗。在2205个疗程中,468例(21.2%)有症状性IDH,其中63例(13.4%)重度IDH患者接受了多巴胺治疗。所有受试者和多巴胺治疗组的平均年龄分别为50.8±9.3岁和64.6±9.5岁(P=0.001)。女性在透析后血压(BP)降低较多(P=0.04)。注射和不注射多巴胺的透析剂量分别为7.9%和4.2% (P<0.001)。多巴胺治疗组肾小球滤过率的改善更大(P=0.03和P=0.04)。降压药较少(aOR: 14.64;95%可信区间[CI]: 7.88-20.41),低透析前收缩压(aOR:5.59;95% CI: 3.88-9.41)和舒张压(aOR: 5.78;95% CI: 4.06-9.81)与多巴胺治疗期独立相关。结论:21.2%的透析患者存在IDH。13.4%的重度IDH患者接受了多巴胺治疗。接受多巴胺治疗的参与者终止透析和住院治疗的次数较少,多巴胺治疗改善了规定的透析,并给予了更高的透析剂量。考虑到低收入国家终止透析的经济影响,透析内多巴胺可能非常有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Potassium Intake on the Renoprotective Response to Sodium Restriction and Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy Interaction of General Obesity and Abdominal Obesity, and Frailty in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease ERA 2024 Interview: Jeroen de Baaij ERA 2024 Interview: Jasper Callemeyn ERA 2024 Interview: Peter Stenvinkel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1