{"title":"Das ›Goldene Zeitalter‹ im modernen Spanien","authors":"Stefan Schreckenberg","doi":"10.3790/ljb.60.1.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Speaking of a ›Golden Age‹ or a Siglo de Oro in reference to Spanish history, culture and literature transforms an ancient myth into a historiographical concept, which seems rather problematical, even contradictory, and at the same time, seen in a wider European context, exceptional. Nevertheless, the Siglo de Oro is still being used not only as a key term in contemporary academic works – inside and outside Spain – on the Early Modern period, but also as a highly controversial idea in political and ideological debates, especially on behalf of what may or may not be Spanish identity.\n This article seeks to give a brief overview of the discussions that try to define the concept of the Siglo de Oro and to present the literary canon as well as the ideological implications linked to it. Starting in the aftermath of the epoch itself, in other words the 18th century, it focuses on the convergence of the political and aesthetical discussions that oppose the ›Two Spains‹ during the 20th century in terms of how to choose and interpret their ›classics‹. Finally, it tries to give a (necessarily incomplete) view on the actual situation, where the Golden Age myth still interferes not only in literary but also in socio-political debates.","PeriodicalId":114283,"journal":{"name":"Volume 60 · 2019","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 60 · 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/ljb.60.1.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Speaking of a ›Golden Age‹ or a Siglo de Oro in reference to Spanish history, culture and literature transforms an ancient myth into a historiographical concept, which seems rather problematical, even contradictory, and at the same time, seen in a wider European context, exceptional. Nevertheless, the Siglo de Oro is still being used not only as a key term in contemporary academic works – inside and outside Spain – on the Early Modern period, but also as a highly controversial idea in political and ideological debates, especially on behalf of what may or may not be Spanish identity.
This article seeks to give a brief overview of the discussions that try to define the concept of the Siglo de Oro and to present the literary canon as well as the ideological implications linked to it. Starting in the aftermath of the epoch itself, in other words the 18th century, it focuses on the convergence of the political and aesthetical discussions that oppose the ›Two Spains‹ during the 20th century in terms of how to choose and interpret their ›classics‹. Finally, it tries to give a (necessarily incomplete) view on the actual situation, where the Golden Age myth still interferes not only in literary but also in socio-political debates.
说到西班牙历史上的“黄金时代”或“西格罗·德·奥罗”,文化和文学将一个古老的神话转化为一个史学概念,这似乎相当有问题,甚至是矛盾的,同时,在更广泛的欧洲背景下,这是例外的。然而,Siglo de Oro不仅在西班牙国内外的当代学术著作中被用作一个关键术语,而且在政治和意识形态辩论中也被用作一个极具争议的概念,特别是代表什么可能是或不代表西班牙身份。本文旨在简要概述试图定义Siglo de Oro概念的讨论,并呈现文学经典以及与之相关的意识形态含义。从时代本身的余波开始,换句话说,从18世纪开始,它关注的是20世纪反对“两个西班牙”的政治和美学讨论的融合,即如何选择和解释他们的“经典”。最后,它试图给出一个(必然是不完整的)对实际情况的看法,即黄金时代的神话不仅干扰文学,而且还干扰社会政治辩论。