The Future of the EU after Brexit, and Covid-19

F. Fabbrini
{"title":"The Future of the EU after Brexit, and Covid-19","authors":"F. Fabbrini","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3604111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reflects on the future of the EU after Brexit — as an entity of 27 member states (EU27). In dealing with a member state that had decided to leave, the EU27 proved able to stick together and jointly defend the common interests, including of its smaller member states. However, the EU27 have faced an increasing number of crises which have profoundly challenged their unity and resolve. Indeed, the subsequent crises shattering the EU — including the euro-crisis, the migration crisis, and the rule of law crisis — and climaxing with Covid-19 have exposed deep divisions among the EU27 and brought to the surface competing visions of the project of European integration. Three alternative ideas of what the EU is and ought to be are increasingly taking shape: a first that sees the EU as a polity, which requires solidarity and a communion of efforts towards a shared destiny; a second that sees the EU as a market, designed to enhance wealth through commerce, but with as limited redistribution as possible; and a third which instead sees the EU as a vehicle to entrench state authoritarian rule, based on national identity and sovereignty claims, but with crucial transnational financial support. While these alternative visions often coexist within each state, they have increasingly become hallmarks of states, or blocs thereof, which are openly facing each other in the EU arena.","PeriodicalId":383483,"journal":{"name":"The Law & Politics of Brexit: Volume II","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Law & Politics of Brexit: Volume II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3604111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the future of the EU after Brexit — as an entity of 27 member states (EU27). In dealing with a member state that had decided to leave, the EU27 proved able to stick together and jointly defend the common interests, including of its smaller member states. However, the EU27 have faced an increasing number of crises which have profoundly challenged their unity and resolve. Indeed, the subsequent crises shattering the EU — including the euro-crisis, the migration crisis, and the rule of law crisis — and climaxing with Covid-19 have exposed deep divisions among the EU27 and brought to the surface competing visions of the project of European integration. Three alternative ideas of what the EU is and ought to be are increasingly taking shape: a first that sees the EU as a polity, which requires solidarity and a communion of efforts towards a shared destiny; a second that sees the EU as a market, designed to enhance wealth through commerce, but with as limited redistribution as possible; and a third which instead sees the EU as a vehicle to entrench state authoritarian rule, based on national identity and sovereignty claims, but with crucial transnational financial support. While these alternative visions often coexist within each state, they have increasingly become hallmarks of states, or blocs thereof, which are openly facing each other in the EU arena.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国脱欧后欧盟的未来,以及新冠肺炎
这一章反映了英国脱欧后欧盟的未来——作为一个由27个成员国组成的实体(EU27)。在处理一个决定脱欧的成员国时,欧盟27国证明能够团结一致,共同捍卫共同利益,包括其较小成员国的利益。然而,欧盟27国面临着越来越多的危机,这些危机深刻地挑战了它们的团结和决心。事实上,随后重创欧盟的危机——包括欧元危机、移民危机和法治危机——以及以新冠肺炎疫情为高潮的危机,暴露了欧盟27国之间的深刻分歧,并使欧洲一体化项目的相互矛盾的愿景浮出水面。关于欧盟是什么以及应该是什么,有三种不同的观点正在逐渐形成:第一种观点认为欧盟是一个政体,需要团结一致,为实现共同命运而共同努力;第二种观点认为欧盟是一个市场,旨在通过商业增加财富,但尽可能限制再分配;第三种则认为欧盟是巩固国家威权统治的工具,以国家认同和主权要求为基础,但有关键的跨国金融支持。虽然这些不同的愿景往往在每个国家内部共存,但它们越来越成为国家或集团的标志,这些国家或集团在欧盟舞台上公开对抗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Irish Border The Ratifications The Extensions Citizens’ Rights The Transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1