The Role of Parliament in Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Southeast Asia in International Parliamentary Forums

Ratih D. Adiputri
{"title":"The Role of Parliament in Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Southeast Asia in International Parliamentary Forums","authors":"Ratih D. Adiputri","doi":"10.36574/JPP.V5I1.173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parliament has its role in supporting Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). SDG number 16 on peace, justice, and strong institution states one indicator of a legislative institution (for “responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative”, that the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) commits to achieve. However, parliament must support the government in achieving all SDG programs as stated in Agenda 2030. What is the role of parliament in this and how to achieve it? This paper aims to show that the role of parliament in SDG is beyond the traditional legislative role of legislating, budgeting and overseeing the government, but more on representing people, meaning channeling people’s voice at the global forums, notably the parliamentary forums discussing sustainable development issues. The cases used in this paper are Southeast Asian parliaments, notably Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. The paper uses four cases of parliamentary gatherings: the World Parliamentary Forum on Sustainable Development Goals in 2017-2019 (3 meetings) that Indonesian parliament organized and the 10th Asia-Europe Parliamentary Meeting (ASEP) in 2018 that the European Parliament organized, where parliaments of Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore were attended. The study shows that the parliaments still focus much on secondary sources for gathering information, that is from the government, senior policymakers, and international agency personnel to support SDG, rather than bringing the constituents’ voices on these forums. The case also shows that personalized politics still exist from the Indonesian parliamentary side –and not so obvious from the Malaysian and Singaporean sides. This may serve as a base for further study of whether the parliamentary system works better than the presidential system. The parliamentary system emphasizes more on the constituent background, while the presidential one states the members’ political party affiliation.","PeriodicalId":209567,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36574/JPP.V5I1.173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Parliament has its role in supporting Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). SDG number 16 on peace, justice, and strong institution states one indicator of a legislative institution (for “responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative”, that the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) commits to achieve. However, parliament must support the government in achieving all SDG programs as stated in Agenda 2030. What is the role of parliament in this and how to achieve it? This paper aims to show that the role of parliament in SDG is beyond the traditional legislative role of legislating, budgeting and overseeing the government, but more on representing people, meaning channeling people’s voice at the global forums, notably the parliamentary forums discussing sustainable development issues. The cases used in this paper are Southeast Asian parliaments, notably Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. The paper uses four cases of parliamentary gatherings: the World Parliamentary Forum on Sustainable Development Goals in 2017-2019 (3 meetings) that Indonesian parliament organized and the 10th Asia-Europe Parliamentary Meeting (ASEP) in 2018 that the European Parliament organized, where parliaments of Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore were attended. The study shows that the parliaments still focus much on secondary sources for gathering information, that is from the government, senior policymakers, and international agency personnel to support SDG, rather than bringing the constituents’ voices on these forums. The case also shows that personalized politics still exist from the Indonesian parliamentary side –and not so obvious from the Malaysian and Singaporean sides. This may serve as a base for further study of whether the parliamentary system works better than the presidential system. The parliamentary system emphasizes more on the constituent background, while the presidential one states the members’ political party affiliation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
议会在可持续发展目标中的作用:以国际议会论坛中的东南亚为例
议会在支持可持续发展目标(SDG)方面发挥作用。关于和平、正义和强大机构的可持续发展目标16阐述了各国议会联盟(议会联盟)致力于实现的立法机构的一项指标(即“响应性、包容性、参与性和代表性”)。然而,议会必须支持政府实现《2030年议程》中所述的所有可持续发展目标。议会在这方面的作用是什么?如何实现这一目标?本文旨在表明,议会在可持续发展目标中的作用超越了传统的立法、预算和监督政府的立法角色,而是更多地代表人民,即在全球论坛上,特别是在讨论可持续发展问题的议会论坛上,引导人民的声音。本文使用的案例是东南亚的议会,特别是印度尼西亚、马来西亚和新加坡。本文使用了四个议会集会案例:印度尼西亚议会组织的2017-2019年可持续发展目标世界议会论坛(3次会议)和欧洲议会组织的2018年第10届亚欧议会会议(ASEP),印度尼西亚、马来西亚和新加坡的议会参加了会议。研究表明,各国议会在收集信息时仍然非常关注二手来源,即来自政府、高级决策者和国际机构人员的信息,以支持可持续发展目标,而不是在这些论坛上听取选民的声音。这个案例还表明,印尼议会方面仍然存在个人政治,而马来西亚和新加坡方面则不那么明显。这可以作为进一步研究议会制是否比总统制更好的基础。议会制更强调组成背景,总统制则强调成员所属政党。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hibernation of the Village Law in Large-Scale Palm Oil Plantations: A Case Study of Oil Palm Expansion in Sintang District, West Kalimantan Government Health Expenditure and Stunting Prevalence Reduction in Indonesia The Role of Gender Equality on Poverty Alleviation: Case of Indonesia The Effect of Local Government’s Elderly Social Assistance on Health Spending of Poor Elderly in Indonesia Critical Success Factor (CSF) of Implementing PPP Road Sector in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1