Evaluating Fairness In Heterogeneous Wireless Ad Hoc Networks

R. Awdeh
{"title":"Evaluating Fairness In Heterogeneous Wireless Ad Hoc Networks","authors":"R. Awdeh","doi":"10.1109/ICCCN.2007.4317960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When both TCP Vegas and TCP Reno share the same wired network, TCP Reno dominates and obtains most of the bandwidth due to its more aggressive mechanisms. In this paper, a simulation study of the compatibility of TCP Reno and TCP Vegas in wireless IEEE 802.11 ad hoc networks using both static and mobile network configurations, is presented. It is shown that when both coexist in the same static ad hoc network, TCP Vegas generally dominates and gets most of the wireless bandwidth. The main reason is that the static wireless ad hoc network environment does not favor the aggressive nature of TCP Reno. However, using a mobile network model, it is shown that TCP Reno is slightly more dominant than TCP Vegas. This is because TCP Vegas is more sensitive to node mobility and the resulting high variability of RTT caused by re-routing. This causes TCP Vegas to lose some of its advantages in mobile environments. In all scenarios examined, it is shown that better fairness can be achieved, while not sacrificing goodput performance, via the use of a small TCP maximum window size.","PeriodicalId":388763,"journal":{"name":"2007 16th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 16th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2007.4317960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

When both TCP Vegas and TCP Reno share the same wired network, TCP Reno dominates and obtains most of the bandwidth due to its more aggressive mechanisms. In this paper, a simulation study of the compatibility of TCP Reno and TCP Vegas in wireless IEEE 802.11 ad hoc networks using both static and mobile network configurations, is presented. It is shown that when both coexist in the same static ad hoc network, TCP Vegas generally dominates and gets most of the wireless bandwidth. The main reason is that the static wireless ad hoc network environment does not favor the aggressive nature of TCP Reno. However, using a mobile network model, it is shown that TCP Reno is slightly more dominant than TCP Vegas. This is because TCP Vegas is more sensitive to node mobility and the resulting high variability of RTT caused by re-routing. This causes TCP Vegas to lose some of its advantages in mobile environments. In all scenarios examined, it is shown that better fairness can be achieved, while not sacrificing goodput performance, via the use of a small TCP maximum window size.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异构无线自组织网络公平性评估
当TCP Vegas和TCP Reno共享同一有线网络时,TCP Reno由于其更激进的机制而占据主导地位并获得大部分带宽。本文在静态和移动网络配置下,对无线IEEE 802.11自组织网络中的TCP Reno和TCP Vegas的兼容性进行了仿真研究。结果表明,当两者共存于同一静态自组织网络中时,TCP Vegas通常占主导地位,并获得大部分无线带宽。主要原因是静态无线自组织网络环境不支持TCP Reno的侵略性。然而,使用移动网络模型,表明TCP Reno比TCP Vegas略占优势。这是因为TCP Vegas对节点移动性和由此引起的重路由RTT的高可变性更敏感。这导致TCP Vegas在移动环境中失去了一些优势。在所有测试的场景中,通过使用较小的TCP最大窗口大小,可以在不牺牲良好性能的情况下实现更好的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiple Access Interference Cancellation and Link Multiplexing for MIMO Mesh Network Containing Hitlist-Based Worms with Polymorphic Signatures Bloom Filter Accelerator for String Matching Challenges and Opportunities in Video Transmission Analysis of Retry Limit for Supporting VoIP in IEEE 802.11e EDCA WLANs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1