Actualización de la validez de los métodos digitales de trazado cefalométrico en 2 dimensiones

Luis Daniel Pellicer Castillo , Alberto F. Albaladejo Martínez , Enrique Jiménez Crespo , María Iglesias Fernández , Adrián Curto Aguilera
{"title":"Actualización de la validez de los métodos digitales de trazado cefalométrico en 2 dimensiones","authors":"Luis Daniel Pellicer Castillo ,&nbsp;Alberto F. Albaladejo Martínez ,&nbsp;Enrique Jiménez Crespo ,&nbsp;María Iglesias Fernández ,&nbsp;Adrián Curto Aguilera","doi":"10.1016/S0210-1637(12)70015-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To present the methods used to study the reliability and validity of twodimensional cephalometry, the programs and systems tested, and the most troublesome cephalometric measurements and points.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a literature review of published studies on digital cephalometric Software. A total of 28 articles, published from 1981 to 2011, met the study requirements. The elements studied in the articles were in various two-dimensional formats (X-ray film, digital copy printing, scanner, software).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>X-ray film showed the best cephalometric tracing. Digital radiography obtained directly or scanned in high resolution radiographic film showed values closest to manual tracing, but digital photography of the film showed significant differences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The latest software is reliable for clinical cephalometric study. As advances in the software were made, differences with older programs became fewer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100995,"journal":{"name":"Ortodoncia Espa?ola","volume":"52 3","pages":"Pages 108-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0210-1637(12)70015-6","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ortodoncia Espa?ola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210163712700156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To present the methods used to study the reliability and validity of twodimensional cephalometry, the programs and systems tested, and the most troublesome cephalometric measurements and points.

Methods

We performed a literature review of published studies on digital cephalometric Software. A total of 28 articles, published from 1981 to 2011, met the study requirements. The elements studied in the articles were in various two-dimensional formats (X-ray film, digital copy printing, scanner, software).

Results

X-ray film showed the best cephalometric tracing. Digital radiography obtained directly or scanned in high resolution radiographic film showed values closest to manual tracing, but digital photography of the film showed significant differences.

Conclusions

The latest software is reliable for clinical cephalometric study. As advances in the software were made, differences with older programs became fewer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更新二维数字头影测绘方法的有效性
目的介绍研究二维头颅测量的信度和效度的方法、测试的程序和系统,以及最麻烦的测量点和难点。方法对已发表的有关数字头颅测量软件的研究进行文献回顾。在1981 - 2011年共发表了28篇符合研究要求的文章。文章中研究的元素是各种二维格式的(x射线胶片、数字复印、扫描仪、软件)。结果x线片表现出良好的头颅示踪。直接获得的数字射线摄影或高分辨率射线摄影胶片扫描显示的数值最接近人工追踪,但胶片的数字摄影显示出显着差异。结论最新软件可用于临床头颅测量研究。随着软件的进步,与旧程序的差异越来越小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Maloclusión ortodóncica severa de clase II: cirugía versus distracción Análisis de la variabilidad y coincidencia diagnóstica de los planos Sella-Nasion y de Frankfurt respecto a la horizontal verdadera en posición natural de la cabeza Consideraciones de la reproducibilidad de posición natural de la cabeza utilizando diferentes métodos Advansync®: otro tratamiento ortopédico de clases II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1