[Short paper] Towards improved collaborative text editing CRDTs by using Natural Language Processing

Jim Bauwens, Kevin De Porre, Elisa Gonzalez Boix
{"title":"[Short paper] Towards improved collaborative text editing CRDTs by using Natural Language Processing","authors":"Jim Bauwens, Kevin De Porre, Elisa Gonzalez Boix","doi":"10.1145/3578358.3591330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative text editing systems are used in a variety of cloud-based products. To ensure that documents remain consistent between users, these systems often rely on CRDTs, operational transformation, or other techniques for achieving (strong) eventual consistency. CRDT-based approaches are appealing as they incorporate strategies to ensure that concurrent updates cannot conflict. However, these strategies do not necessarily take into account program semantics and may result in unexpected behaviour from the end-user's perspective. For example, conflict resolution strategies in collaborative text editors may lead to duplicate words and incorrectly merged sentences. This position paper investigates the use of deterministic natural language processing (NLP) algorithms to improve the concurrency semantics of collaborative text editing systems that rely on CRDTs, aiming to provide a better end-user experience. We explore what is needed to ensure convergence, and highlight potential difficulties with the approach.","PeriodicalId":198398,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Principles and Practice of Consistency for Distributed Data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Principles and Practice of Consistency for Distributed Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3578358.3591330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative text editing systems are used in a variety of cloud-based products. To ensure that documents remain consistent between users, these systems often rely on CRDTs, operational transformation, or other techniques for achieving (strong) eventual consistency. CRDT-based approaches are appealing as they incorporate strategies to ensure that concurrent updates cannot conflict. However, these strategies do not necessarily take into account program semantics and may result in unexpected behaviour from the end-user's perspective. For example, conflict resolution strategies in collaborative text editors may lead to duplicate words and incorrectly merged sentences. This position paper investigates the use of deterministic natural language processing (NLP) algorithms to improve the concurrency semantics of collaborative text editing systems that rely on CRDTs, aiming to provide a better end-user experience. We explore what is needed to ensure convergence, and highlight potential difficulties with the approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[短文]利用自然语言处理改进协同文本编辑crdt
协作文本编辑系统用于各种基于云的产品。为了确保文档在用户之间保持一致,这些系统通常依赖于crdt、操作转换或其他技术来实现(强)最终的一致性。基于crdt的方法很有吸引力,因为它们包含了确保并发更新不会冲突的策略。然而,这些策略不一定考虑到程序语义,从最终用户的角度来看可能会导致意外的行为。例如,协作文本编辑器中的冲突解决策略可能导致重复的单词和错误合并的句子。本文研究了确定性自然语言处理(NLP)算法的使用,以改进依赖于crdt的协作文本编辑系统的并发语义,旨在提供更好的最终用户体验。我们探讨了确保趋同所需的条件,并强调了这种方法的潜在困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verify, And Then Trust: Data Inconsistency Detection in ZooKeeper Data Management for mobile applications dependent on geo-located data A Study of Semantics for CRDT-based Collaborative Spreadsheets AMC: Towards Trustworthy and Explorable CRDT Applications with the Automerge Model Checker Probabilistic Causal Contexts for Scalable CRDTs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1