{"title":"Improving Gallager's upper bound on Huffman codes redundancy","authors":"Jia-Pei Shen, J. Gill","doi":"10.1109/ISIT.2001.936081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose the first single bound that supersedes Gallager's (1978) upper bound on the redundancy of binary Huffman codes with the given largest source symbol probability ranging from 0 to 0.5. We define the linear logarithm and linear logarithm entropy. We find the maximal difference between the linear and the ordinary logarithms. We prove that the \"redundancy\" of a binary Huffmann code with respect to the linear logarithm entropy is no more than the largest source symbol probability. We therefore establish a better upper bound than Gallager's on the redundancy of binary Huffman codes.","PeriodicalId":433761,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37252)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37252)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2001.936081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We propose the first single bound that supersedes Gallager's (1978) upper bound on the redundancy of binary Huffman codes with the given largest source symbol probability ranging from 0 to 0.5. We define the linear logarithm and linear logarithm entropy. We find the maximal difference between the linear and the ordinary logarithms. We prove that the "redundancy" of a binary Huffmann code with respect to the linear logarithm entropy is no more than the largest source symbol probability. We therefore establish a better upper bound than Gallager's on the redundancy of binary Huffman codes.