Identifying the loci of lexical semantic breakdown in aphasia and the choice of therapy techniques

Haripriya Telakkadan, Sumanth Arakere Venkatesh, Abhishek Buddiguppe Panchakshari
{"title":"Identifying the loci of lexical semantic breakdown in aphasia and the choice of therapy techniques","authors":"Haripriya Telakkadan, Sumanth Arakere Venkatesh, Abhishek Buddiguppe Panchakshari","doi":"10.18231/j.ijn.2023.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Word finding would be more challenging in a person with aphasia because of a breakdown in lexical semantics. Words may be difficult to locate if they are not stored appropriately or readily available. In addition, the inability to access language could be the result of a weakness in either the lemma node, leading to verbal paraphasia, or the phoneme retrieval, leading to phonemic paraphasia. Commonly used to avoid this lexical semantic gap, cueing allows for clearer communication. SFA and PCA methods are also used to aid in the search for appropriate words. The study was carried out on persons with anomic aphasia. After determining the source of the lexical semantic breakdown, the goal of this research was to determine an appropriate therapeutic strategy. There were 12 people with anomic aphasia who participated in the research. Tasks tapping phoneme judgment and semantic judgment were given to the participants. Two individuals withdrew out of the study, while four subjects fared poorly on PCA (group 1). Six subjects performed poorly on the semantic judgment test (group 2). Training for Group 1 used PCA, while training for Group 2 used SFA. After training, participants' ability to recall names and verbs was evaluated using the Boston Naming Test and the Action Naming Test. After training, participants in both groups showed considerable improvement on the retests of the naming and judgment tasks.","PeriodicalId":415114,"journal":{"name":"IP Indian Journal of Neurosciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Indian Journal of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2023.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Word finding would be more challenging in a person with aphasia because of a breakdown in lexical semantics. Words may be difficult to locate if they are not stored appropriately or readily available. In addition, the inability to access language could be the result of a weakness in either the lemma node, leading to verbal paraphasia, or the phoneme retrieval, leading to phonemic paraphasia. Commonly used to avoid this lexical semantic gap, cueing allows for clearer communication. SFA and PCA methods are also used to aid in the search for appropriate words. The study was carried out on persons with anomic aphasia. After determining the source of the lexical semantic breakdown, the goal of this research was to determine an appropriate therapeutic strategy. There were 12 people with anomic aphasia who participated in the research. Tasks tapping phoneme judgment and semantic judgment were given to the participants. Two individuals withdrew out of the study, while four subjects fared poorly on PCA (group 1). Six subjects performed poorly on the semantic judgment test (group 2). Training for Group 1 used PCA, while training for Group 2 used SFA. After training, participants' ability to recall names and verbs was evaluated using the Boston Naming Test and the Action Naming Test. After training, participants in both groups showed considerable improvement on the retests of the naming and judgment tasks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失语症词汇语义分解位点的识别及治疗方法的选择
对于失语症患者来说,找词会更具挑战性,因为他们在词汇语义上有缺陷。如果没有适当地存储或随时可用,单词可能难以定位。此外,无法接触语言可能是由于外源节点的缺陷,导致言语失读,或者音素检索的缺陷,导致音位失读。通常用于避免这种词汇语义差距,提示允许更清晰的交流。SFA和PCA方法也用于帮助搜索合适的单词。这项研究是在失语症患者身上进行的。在确定词汇语义分解的来源后,本研究的目标是确定适当的治疗策略。共有12名失语症患者参与了这项研究。被试被分配了音素判断和语义判断任务。两名受试者退出研究,四名受试者在PCA测试中表现不佳(第一组)。六名受试者在语义判断测试中表现不佳(第二组)。第一组的训练使用PCA,而第二组的训练使用SFA。训练结束后,用波士顿命名测试和动作命名测试来评估参与者回忆人名和动词的能力。经过训练后,两组参与者在命名和判断任务的复试中都表现出相当大的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A study of brains complex organs-organisms with artificial intelligence system to evolve cardinal feature-manifestations of brain`s (self-organizing) Survival and analysis of patients with various central nervous tumors who received post-operative radiation therapy: A retrospective study Diagnostic concordance in consultation liaison psychiatry – Referring physicians to psychiatrists An interesting case of post dengue Guillain Barre syndrome Dichotomous interpretations and a stroke of luck: A case of silent cerebral hemorrhage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1