The principle of ex officio investigation on the administrative and judicial authorities

I. Balakarieva, N. Pysarenko, Andriy Shkolyk
{"title":"The principle of ex officio investigation on the administrative and judicial authorities","authors":"I. Balakarieva, N. Pysarenko, Andriy Shkolyk","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.159.269738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper makes an attempt to identify the essence of the principle of ex officio investigation, which is considered common to administrative procedure and administrative proceedings. The authors set the task of analyzing not only the similar manifestations of this principle in the procedure and proceedings. An equally important for understanding the essence of the principle, and therefore the correct application of procedural and processual norms, is, according to the authors, to distinguish its different manifestations that cannot be ignored, because this principle forms the basis for the activities of representatives of various branches of power, namely executive and judicial. In order to perform the stated task, the paper analyzes among the rules of the Law of Ukraine \"On Administrative Procedure\" and the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine those that characterize the considered principle, it is demonstrated in comparison how the representatives of each branch of power use them. As a result, the paper states that the representatives of executive and judicial authorities, under the influence of the principle of ex officio investigation, demonstrate evident activity in proceedings: they are authorized to take actions on their own, without obtaining the consent of the interested parties, which guarantee that the decision made by them in the case will fully meet the requirements declared at the regulatory level. At the same time, such activity is ensured by norms formulated taking into account the nature of the activities of each of the subjects of power, and therefore, in its manifestations, it cannot be recognized as identical.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.159.269738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper makes an attempt to identify the essence of the principle of ex officio investigation, which is considered common to administrative procedure and administrative proceedings. The authors set the task of analyzing not only the similar manifestations of this principle in the procedure and proceedings. An equally important for understanding the essence of the principle, and therefore the correct application of procedural and processual norms, is, according to the authors, to distinguish its different manifestations that cannot be ignored, because this principle forms the basis for the activities of representatives of various branches of power, namely executive and judicial. In order to perform the stated task, the paper analyzes among the rules of the Law of Ukraine "On Administrative Procedure" and the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine those that characterize the considered principle, it is demonstrated in comparison how the representatives of each branch of power use them. As a result, the paper states that the representatives of executive and judicial authorities, under the influence of the principle of ex officio investigation, demonstrate evident activity in proceedings: they are authorized to take actions on their own, without obtaining the consent of the interested parties, which guarantee that the decision made by them in the case will fully meet the requirements declared at the regulatory level. At the same time, such activity is ensured by norms formulated taking into account the nature of the activities of each of the subjects of power, and therefore, in its manifestations, it cannot be recognized as identical.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行政和司法机关依职权调查原则
当然侦查原则是行政程序和行政诉讼中共同存在的原则,本文试图对其本质进行辨析。作者的任务不仅是分析这一原则在程序和程序中的类似表现。作者认为,对于理解该原则的本质,从而正确应用程序和程序规范,同样重要的是区分其不可忽视的不同表现形式,因为这一原则构成了行政和司法等各权力部门代表活动的基础。为了完成既定的任务,本文分析了乌克兰《行政程序法》和乌克兰《行政诉讼法》中具有所考虑原则特征的规则,并通过比较展示了各权力部门的代表如何使用这些规则。因此,该文件指出,行政和司法机关的代表在当然调查原则的影响下,在诉讼中表现出明显的活动:他们被授权自行采取行动,而无需获得利害关系方的同意,这保证了他们在案件中作出的决定将完全符合在监管一级宣布的要求。与此同时,这种活动是由考虑到每一个权力主体的活动的性质而制定的规范保证的,因此,在其表现形式上,它不能被认为是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of legal regulation of exemptions in the payment and calculation of land fees in the conditions of martial law on the basis of judicial practice Ways to Protect Infringed Rights in the Creation and Distribution of Deepfakes Creation and Legal Status of a Specially Authorized Body of Non-Banking Financial Services Implementation of the Ecosystem Services Concept in the Environmental Legislation of Ukraine: Current State and Prospects Modern Challenges of Adjusting the Effectiveness of the Application of Laws (on the Example of Tax and Legal Regulation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1