Evidential Analysis of Terrorism and I-VEO Knowledge Matrix in the Context of Security as Pure Public Good: The case of Pakistan from 1990 to 2010

Aziz Ahmed, Nagina Gul, Hussan Ara Magsi
{"title":"Evidential Analysis of Terrorism and I-VEO Knowledge Matrix in the Context of Security as Pure Public Good: The case of Pakistan from 1990 to 2010","authors":"Aziz Ahmed, Nagina Gul, Hussan Ara Magsi","doi":"10.31703/gmsr.2021(vi-i).06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The case of Pakistan has presented if security provision is a pure public good in the light of the I-VEO Knowledge Matrix hypotheses. Evidential analysis of the data from 1990 to 2010 from the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) suggests that terrorism incidents are not reduced with the increase of public expenditure on defence, and instead, more fatalities and injuries are witnessed during the years. The analysis is based in isolation to terrorist attacks, defence expenditure and relating hypotheses of Influential Violent Extremists Organization Knowledge Matrix (I- VEO Knowledge Matrix) and counterterrorism operations, at ceteris paribus. The I-VEO Knowledge Matrix shows there is a lack of a comprehensive set of strategy based on the collection of relevant hypotheses more productive than the existing and likely less effective counterterrorism strategies to ensure security provision as a pure public good in the case of Pakistan","PeriodicalId":136725,"journal":{"name":"Global Management Sciences Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Management Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2021(vi-i).06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The case of Pakistan has presented if security provision is a pure public good in the light of the I-VEO Knowledge Matrix hypotheses. Evidential analysis of the data from 1990 to 2010 from the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) suggests that terrorism incidents are not reduced with the increase of public expenditure on defence, and instead, more fatalities and injuries are witnessed during the years. The analysis is based in isolation to terrorist attacks, defence expenditure and relating hypotheses of Influential Violent Extremists Organization Knowledge Matrix (I- VEO Knowledge Matrix) and counterterrorism operations, at ceteris paribus. The I-VEO Knowledge Matrix shows there is a lack of a comprehensive set of strategy based on the collection of relevant hypotheses more productive than the existing and likely less effective counterterrorism strategies to ensure security provision as a pure public good in the case of Pakistan
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全作为纯公共产品背景下恐怖主义与I-VEO知识矩阵的证据分析——以1990 - 2010年巴基斯坦为例
巴基斯坦的案例表明,根据I-VEO知识矩阵假设,安全提供是否是一种纯粹的公共产品。对全球恐怖主义数据库(GTD) 1990年至2010年数据的证据分析表明,恐怖主义事件并没有随着国防公共支出的增加而减少,相反,这些年来目睹了更多的伤亡。在其他条件相同的情况下,分析是孤立地基于恐怖袭击、国防开支和有关有影响的暴力极端主义组织知识矩阵(I- VEO知识矩阵)和反恐行动的假设。I-VEO知识矩阵显示,在巴基斯坦的情况下,缺乏一套基于相关假设集合的综合战略,该战略比现有的、可能不太有效的反恐战略更有成效,以确保安全提供作为一种纯粹的公共产品
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of Takaful Pakistan: Evidence from Hemayah Takaful Peshawar Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Financial Performance of Islamic Banks: Evidence from Pakistan Conventional Banks Specific Determinant on the Financial Performance: Evidence from Pakistan Internet Banking; Challenges in Pakistan The Impact of Financial Inclusion on the Economic Growth of Pakistan: Evidence from Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1