Stakeholder Perceptions of the Design Regulatory Process: Implications for Their Future Relevance and Efficacy in Preservation Practice

C. Bonney, Hadley Peterson
{"title":"Stakeholder Perceptions of the Design Regulatory Process: Implications for Their Future Relevance and Efficacy in Preservation Practice","authors":"C. Bonney, Hadley Peterson","doi":"10.1353/per.2019.a799475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Through an analysis of stakeholder perceptions of design regulations in local historic preservation districts of three South Carolina cities, researchers revealed opinions about the impact and effectiveness of design guidelines in both shaping the physical form of historic districts and protecting their individual character. We investigated the ways in which the end users—residents, property owners, and investors—perceive design regulation to determine the degree to which residents felt either empowered or disenfranchised by the process. A combination of online survey and supporting archival research was utilized, first to collect resident opinions regarding the process, and then to cross-check those results with city records. Using this methodology, gaps between the way stakeholders perceive and understand the design regulatory process and the way it is implemented within each community were identified. With a better understanding of these misalignments, those responsible for executing design regulations are equipped to address the potential impacts that residents' perceptions can have on revitalization efforts within historic districts.","PeriodicalId":211364,"journal":{"name":"Preservation Education & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preservation Education & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/per.2019.a799475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Through an analysis of stakeholder perceptions of design regulations in local historic preservation districts of three South Carolina cities, researchers revealed opinions about the impact and effectiveness of design guidelines in both shaping the physical form of historic districts and protecting their individual character. We investigated the ways in which the end users—residents, property owners, and investors—perceive design regulation to determine the degree to which residents felt either empowered or disenfranchised by the process. A combination of online survey and supporting archival research was utilized, first to collect resident opinions regarding the process, and then to cross-check those results with city records. Using this methodology, gaps between the way stakeholders perceive and understand the design regulatory process and the way it is implemented within each community were identified. With a better understanding of these misalignments, those responsible for executing design regulations are equipped to address the potential impacts that residents' perceptions can have on revitalization efforts within historic districts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者对设计监管过程的看法:对其未来在保护实践中的相关性和有效性的影响
摘要/ Abstract摘要:通过对南卡罗莱纳三个城市当地历史保护区设计法规的利益相关者看法的分析,研究人员揭示了设计指南在塑造历史街区物理形态和保护其个性方面的影响和有效性。我们调查了最终用户(居民、业主和投资者)感知设计法规的方式,以确定居民在这个过程中感到被授权或被剥夺权利的程度。在线调查和辅助档案研究相结合,首先收集居民对这一过程的意见,然后与城市记录交叉核对这些结果。使用这种方法,确定了利益相关者感知和理解设计监管流程的方式与在每个社区中实施的方式之间的差距。有了对这些错位的更好理解,那些负责执行设计法规的人就有能力解决居民的看法可能对历史街区内的复兴工作产生的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cover Art The Misunderstood History of Gentrification: People, Planning, Preservation, and Urban Renewal, 1915–2020 by Dennis E. Gale (review) Leadership in Planning: How to Communicate Ideas and Effect Positive Change by Jeff Levine (review) Building Rapport and the Foundation of Good Partnerships: The Muscogee (Creek) Nation Approach to Protecting Cultural Sites in Partnership with Department of Defense Components Partners as Stakeholders in Cultural Property Protection: Bridging the Intrinsic and Instrumental Value of Cultural Heritage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1