A Comparison between ECG Beat Classifiers Using Multiclass SVM and SIMCA with Time Domain PCA Feature Reduction

N. Jannah, S. Hadjiloucas
{"title":"A Comparison between ECG Beat Classifiers Using Multiclass SVM and SIMCA with Time Domain PCA Feature Reduction","authors":"N. Jannah, S. Hadjiloucas","doi":"10.1109/UKSim.2017.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detection and treatment of arrhythmias has become one of the main goals in cardiac care diagnosis provided by general practitioners. Electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis is one of the most commonly used tools to test and diagnose heart problems. Classification of ECG heartbeats enables the identification of specific arrhythmia or other heart conditions. This paper presents and contrasts the results from two effective ECG arrhythmia classification schemes. The first scheme consists of a principal component analysis (PCA) step for feature reduction at the input vector to the classifier, combined with soft independent modelling of class analogy (SIMCA). The second method uses a multi-class support vector machine (MSVM) classifier to differentiate between four different types of arrhythmia from ECG beats. The four types of beats include Normal (N), Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC), and Atrial premature contraction (APC) and Right Bundle Branch Block Beat (RBBB). The time domain features were obtained from the St Petersburg INCART 12-lead Arrhythmia Database (incartdb). Between 10 and 30 Principal Components (PCs) were selected for reconstructing individual ECG beats and create the input vector to the classifier. The average classification accuracy of the proposed scheme is 76.83% and 98.33% using MSVM and SIMCA classifier respectively. The SIMCA classification algorithm provided better performance than the MSVM classifiers.","PeriodicalId":309250,"journal":{"name":"2017 UKSim-AMSS 19th International Conference on Computer Modelling & Simulation (UKSim)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 UKSim-AMSS 19th International Conference on Computer Modelling & Simulation (UKSim)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UKSim.2017.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Detection and treatment of arrhythmias has become one of the main goals in cardiac care diagnosis provided by general practitioners. Electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis is one of the most commonly used tools to test and diagnose heart problems. Classification of ECG heartbeats enables the identification of specific arrhythmia or other heart conditions. This paper presents and contrasts the results from two effective ECG arrhythmia classification schemes. The first scheme consists of a principal component analysis (PCA) step for feature reduction at the input vector to the classifier, combined with soft independent modelling of class analogy (SIMCA). The second method uses a multi-class support vector machine (MSVM) classifier to differentiate between four different types of arrhythmia from ECG beats. The four types of beats include Normal (N), Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC), and Atrial premature contraction (APC) and Right Bundle Branch Block Beat (RBBB). The time domain features were obtained from the St Petersburg INCART 12-lead Arrhythmia Database (incartdb). Between 10 and 30 Principal Components (PCs) were selected for reconstructing individual ECG beats and create the input vector to the classifier. The average classification accuracy of the proposed scheme is 76.83% and 98.33% using MSVM and SIMCA classifier respectively. The SIMCA classification algorithm provided better performance than the MSVM classifiers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多类支持向量机与时域PCA特征约简SIMCA心电心跳分类器的比较
心律失常的检测和治疗已成为全科医生提供心脏护理诊断的主要目标之一。心电图(ECG)分析是检测和诊断心脏问题最常用的工具之一。心电图心跳的分类能够识别特定的心律失常或其他心脏疾病。本文介绍并比较了两种有效的心电心律失常分类方案的结果。第一种方案包括主成分分析(PCA)步骤,用于分类器输入向量的特征约简,并结合类类比的软独立建模(SIMCA)。第二种方法使用多类支持向量机(MSVM)分类器区分四种不同类型的心律失常和心电搏动。四种类型的心跳包括正常(N)、室性早搏(PVC)、心房早搏(APC)和右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)。时域特征取自圣彼得堡INCART 12导联心律失常数据库(incartdb)。选取10 ~ 30个主成分(Principal Components, pc)重构单个心电心跳,并创建分类器的输入向量。使用MSVM和SIMCA分类器,所提出方案的平均分类准确率分别为76.83%和98.33%。SIMCA分类算法的性能优于MSVM分类器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prototype Wireless Controller System Based on Raspberry Pi and Arduino for Engraving Machine System Based Modelling Approach for Biomechanical Models in the Field of Prosthetics Modeling Isolated Traffic Control Strategies in TraffSim Modal Analysis: A Comparison between Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Practical Laser Doppler Vibrometer (LDV) Testing Maximizing System Capacity Using Adaptive Coding and Modulation Techniques for Slowly Fading Channels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1