Basic Considerations of Humanity in Relation to the Convergences of Regimes of Protection of the Human Person

A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade
{"title":"Basic Considerations of Humanity in Relation to the Convergences of Regimes of Protection of the Human Person","authors":"A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade","doi":"10.1163/9789004255074_025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A critical review of classic doctrine concerning the regimes of protection of the human person reveals that it used to endorse a rather compartmentalized outlook, - distinguishing the International Law of Human Rights, International Refugee Law and International Humanitarian Law, - due in great part to an exagerated emphasis in the distinct historical origins of the three regimes of protection. The character of jus cogens of non-refoulement places this latter above political considerations both of States and of political organs of international organizations; in this way, it also calls the attention to the importance of the access of the individuals to justice at international level. Despite the incongruities of the practice of States in our times, the opinio juris communis enlightens the path to follow, which is prevalence of the fundamental rights of the human person in all and any circumstances. Keywords:International Human Rights Law; International Humanitarian Law; International Refugee Law; jus cogens; non-refoulement","PeriodicalId":347946,"journal":{"name":"International Law for Humankind","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Law for Humankind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004255074_025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A critical review of classic doctrine concerning the regimes of protection of the human person reveals that it used to endorse a rather compartmentalized outlook, - distinguishing the International Law of Human Rights, International Refugee Law and International Humanitarian Law, - due in great part to an exagerated emphasis in the distinct historical origins of the three regimes of protection. The character of jus cogens of non-refoulement places this latter above political considerations both of States and of political organs of international organizations; in this way, it also calls the attention to the importance of the access of the individuals to justice at international level. Despite the incongruities of the practice of States in our times, the opinio juris communis enlightens the path to follow, which is prevalence of the fundamental rights of the human person in all and any circumstances. Keywords:International Human Rights Law; International Humanitarian Law; International Refugee Law; jus cogens; non-refoulement
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于人身保护制度趋同的人道主义基本考虑
对关于人身保护制度的经典学说的批判性审查表明,它过去赞成一种相当划分的观点,即区分国际人权法、国际难民法和国际人道主义法,这在很大程度上是由于过分强调三种保护制度的不同历史渊源。不驱回强制法的性质使后者凌驾于国家和国际组织政治机构的政治考虑之上;这样,它还提请注意个人在国际一级诉诸司法的重要性。尽管各国在我们这个时代的做法不协调,但社会法律意见为今后的道路指明了方向,即在所有和任何情况下普遍享有人的基本权利。关键词:国际人权法;国际人道主义法;国际难民法;强制法;non-refoulement
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Index Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes: Current State and Perspectives Conceptual Constructions: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes The Material Source of International Law: Manifestations of the Universal Juridical Conscience Basic Considerations of Humanity in Relation to the Law of Treaties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1