Talen en spiralen: kennis en besluitvorming in anticonceptieconsultaties met een taalbarrière

Ella van Hest, J. De Wilde
{"title":"Talen en spiralen: kennis en besluitvorming in anticonceptieconsultaties met een taalbarrière","authors":"Ella van Hest, J. De Wilde","doi":"10.5117/tvt2021.2.003.vanh","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Misconception and contraception: knowledge and decision-making in contraceptive consultations with a language barrier\n \n Just like in general medical consultations, different domains of knowledge come together and are negotiated in contraceptive consultations, followed by decision-making on the contraceptive method. Research shows that a language barrier can hamper knowledge negotiation and decision-making in medical consultations. Our paper contributes to those findings by focussing on contraceptive counselling as a specific and underexplored consultation type. We gathered our data in a Belgian abortion clinic, where contraception is discussed during the consultations, and where an important part of the consultations are characterised by a language barrier. We adopt a Bourdieusian view on language as capital, and use a linguistic ethnographic and interactional sociolinguistic approach, complemented with analytical tools from conversation analysis on epistemics and deontics. The analysis of data fragments, ranging from a limited to a double language barrier, shows that this barrier is connected in various ways with how, and how much, knowledge is negotiated. Incomplete renditions, interruptions, epistemic and deontic claims from non-professional interpreters, along with a lack of shared contextualisation, impede clients to gather information and therefore influence decision-making. We conclude that a language barrier involves a potential risk for knowledge negotiation and decision-making in contraceptive consultations. More attention from healthcare professionals to language barriers could empower women in their sexual and reproductive health choices.","PeriodicalId":192335,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/tvt2021.2.003.vanh","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Misconception and contraception: knowledge and decision-making in contraceptive consultations with a language barrier Just like in general medical consultations, different domains of knowledge come together and are negotiated in contraceptive consultations, followed by decision-making on the contraceptive method. Research shows that a language barrier can hamper knowledge negotiation and decision-making in medical consultations. Our paper contributes to those findings by focussing on contraceptive counselling as a specific and underexplored consultation type. We gathered our data in a Belgian abortion clinic, where contraception is discussed during the consultations, and where an important part of the consultations are characterised by a language barrier. We adopt a Bourdieusian view on language as capital, and use a linguistic ethnographic and interactional sociolinguistic approach, complemented with analytical tools from conversation analysis on epistemics and deontics. The analysis of data fragments, ranging from a limited to a double language barrier, shows that this barrier is connected in various ways with how, and how much, knowledge is negotiated. Incomplete renditions, interruptions, epistemic and deontic claims from non-professional interpreters, along with a lack of shared contextualisation, impede clients to gather information and therefore influence decision-making. We conclude that a language barrier involves a potential risk for knowledge negotiation and decision-making in contraceptive consultations. More attention from healthcare professionals to language barriers could empower women in their sexual and reproductive health choices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言与螺旋:有语言障碍的避孕咨询中的知识与决策
误解与避孕:有语言障碍的避孕咨询中的知识与决策 就像一般的医疗咨询一样,在避孕咨询中,不同领域的知识会汇聚在一起并进行协商,然后就避孕方法做出决策。研究表明,语言障碍会妨碍医疗咨询中的知识协商和决策。我们的论文将重点放在避孕咨询上,将其作为一种特殊的、未被充分探索的咨询类型,从而为这些研究成果做出贡献。我们在比利时的一家人工流产诊所收集了数据,该诊所在问诊过程中讨论避孕问题,而问诊的一个重要部分就是语言障碍。我们采用布尔迪厄斯(Bourdieusian)将语言视为资本的观点,使用语言人种学和互动社会语言学方法,并辅以认识论和义务论对话分析工具。对从有限语言障碍到双重语言障碍的数据片段进行的分析表明,这种障碍与知识的协商方式和协商程度有着不同的联系。非专业口译员的不完整翻译、打断、认识论和义务论主张,以及缺乏共同语境,都阻碍了客户收集信息,从而影响决策。我们的结论是,语言障碍对避孕咨询中的知识协商和决策具有潜在风险。医护人员对语言障碍给予更多关注,可以增强妇女在性健康和生殖健康选择方面的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Begrijp jij het? Mixed-method monitor van overheidsteksten De concreetheid van teksten: concreetheidsscores en een meetinstrument Vernieuwend formuleer- en schrijfstijlonderwijs voor klas 3 en 4 havo/vwo Welke rol kan communicatie spelen bij het oplossen van grote maatschappelijke problemen? De effecten van het werken met een toolbox op de kennis, self-efficacy en vaardigheden van leerlingen die alinea’s schrijven
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1