Corporate governance, ownership concentration and performance of European agricultural companies: New empirical evidence

Graţiela Georgiana Noja (email: gratiela.noja@e-Uvt.ro ), M. Cristea, N. Sîrghi, Oana-Ramona Socoliuc Guriță, Ioana Vădăsan, D. Cîrciumaru
{"title":"Corporate governance, ownership concentration and performance of European agricultural companies: New empirical evidence","authors":"Graţiela Georgiana Noja (email: gratiela.noja@e-Uvt.ro ), M. Cristea, N. Sîrghi, Oana-Ramona Socoliuc Guriță, Ioana Vădăsan, D. Cîrciumaru","doi":"10.17221/78/2023-agricecon","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Considering the relevance of the agricultural sectors for the European countries' development, but also the volatile features of agriculture, with unforeseen risks induced by climate, ensuring durable economic progress is fore-most for the companies. This paper aims to assess the associations of the key parties in corporate governance (directors, managers, advisers, and shareholders), employees and the independence level with the main outcomes and capacity/ size of the European companies operating in agriculture, fishing, and aquaculture activities. Using a newly compiled and complex dataset of 3 184 active companies from Europe, provided by the ORBIS database, advanced modelling approaches were employed, based on the robust regression (RREG) and Gaussian Graphical Model (GGM). The main findings emphasised that: directors, managers, and advisors had a strong positive influence on the firms' size, boosting their turnover, and the shareholders' funds; advisors induced positive connections with the companies' liquidity; the number of employees exerted positive impacts on the firms' size and outcomes of these companies; the independence level exerted a negative impact on the firms' size and outcomes. Finally, specific measures must be addressed to primarily reconsider the number of directors and managers and the shareholders' participation in the ownership of these companies due to their unfavourable exerted effects.","PeriodicalId":283940,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/78/2023-agricecon","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Considering the relevance of the agricultural sectors for the European countries' development, but also the volatile features of agriculture, with unforeseen risks induced by climate, ensuring durable economic progress is fore-most for the companies. This paper aims to assess the associations of the key parties in corporate governance (directors, managers, advisers, and shareholders), employees and the independence level with the main outcomes and capacity/ size of the European companies operating in agriculture, fishing, and aquaculture activities. Using a newly compiled and complex dataset of 3 184 active companies from Europe, provided by the ORBIS database, advanced modelling approaches were employed, based on the robust regression (RREG) and Gaussian Graphical Model (GGM). The main findings emphasised that: directors, managers, and advisors had a strong positive influence on the firms' size, boosting their turnover, and the shareholders' funds; advisors induced positive connections with the companies' liquidity; the number of employees exerted positive impacts on the firms' size and outcomes of these companies; the independence level exerted a negative impact on the firms' size and outcomes. Finally, specific measures must be addressed to primarily reconsider the number of directors and managers and the shareholders' participation in the ownership of these companies due to their unfavourable exerted effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公司治理、股权集中度与欧洲农业公司绩效:新的实证证据
考虑到农业部门与欧洲国家发展的相关性,以及农业的不稳定性,以及气候引起的不可预见的风险,确保可持续的经济发展是公司的首要任务。本文旨在评估公司治理(董事、经理、顾问和股东)、员工和独立性水平与主要成果和从事农业、渔业和水产养殖活动的欧洲公司的能力/规模之间的关联。利用ORBIS数据库提供的新编译的3184家欧洲活跃企业的复杂数据集,采用基于稳健回归(RREG)和高斯图形模型(GGM)的先进建模方法。主要研究结果强调:董事、经理和顾问对公司规模、提高公司营业额和股东资金有很强的正向影响;顾问诱导了与公司流动性的积极联系;员工数量对企业规模和企业绩效有正向影响;独立程度对企业规模和结果均有负向影响。最后,必须采取具体措施,主要重新考虑这些公司的董事和经理的数量和股东的参与所有权,因为它们的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unravelling the bidirectional impact of Chinese agricultural subsidy policy on agricultural efficiency and farmers' income through panel data analysis Will the financialisation of agricultural products exacerbate food security risks? Empirical analysis from major grain-producing countries worldwide Impact of production outsourcing on the adoption of low-carbon agricultural technologies in China Corporate social responsibility and the relationship to stakeholders in large agricultural holdings in the Czech Republic Beef, lamb, pork and poultry meat commodity prices: Historical fluctuations and synchronisation with a focus on recent global crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1