Ex Vivo Versus In Vivo Liposuction Hemolysis Index in High-Definition Liposuction and Body Contouring

A. Mowlavi, Zachary Sin, Stephanie Young, Chelsea Sahami, V. Sharma
{"title":"Ex Vivo Versus In Vivo Liposuction Hemolysis Index in High-Definition Liposuction and Body Contouring","authors":"A. Mowlavi, Zachary Sin, Stephanie Young, Chelsea Sahami, V. Sharma","doi":"10.1177/07488068221104568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ex vivo liposuction is a novel technique wherein tissues that are preoperatively planned for excision can be liposuctioned in a sterile manner after removal from the patient. Excised tissues are routinely obtained during a tummy tuck or variant, lateral thigh tuck, buttock tuck, brachioplasty, upper body tuck, and medial thigh tuck. These tucking procedures are performed when moderate to severe skin redundancy is present in patients undergoing body contouring. Traditionally, these tissues were first liposuctioned prior to being excised, termed in vivo liposuction. However, we have developed ex vivo liposuction protocols wherein the tissues are liposuctioned after they have been excised off the patient. Routine processing of harvested fat focuses on minimizing blood products in the aspirate prior to injection. This is because blood products are felt to contain pro-inflammatory products that negatively affect fat graft take. We hypothesized that fat collected by ex vivo technique provides a less bloody harvest than fat collected by in vivo technique. We quantitated blood concentrate of ex vivo versus in vivo fat aspirate by comparing the hemolysis index in 14 consecutive patients undergoing high-definition liposuction and body contouring. Comparison of hemolysis index demonstrated significant reduction in blood concentrate in ex vivo versus in vivo fat aspirate. In vivo hemolysis index demonstrated a larger median than ex vivo hemolysis index. These results confirm our clinical observation that fat harvested by ex vivo liposuction is cleaner and less blood-tinged than fat harvested by in vivo liposuction. No patients experienced complications related to fat graft infection nor fat emboli. Ex vivo liposuction has proven a safe and less blood-tinged technique for harvesting fat in patients who require excisional procedures.","PeriodicalId":297650,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07488068221104568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ex vivo liposuction is a novel technique wherein tissues that are preoperatively planned for excision can be liposuctioned in a sterile manner after removal from the patient. Excised tissues are routinely obtained during a tummy tuck or variant, lateral thigh tuck, buttock tuck, brachioplasty, upper body tuck, and medial thigh tuck. These tucking procedures are performed when moderate to severe skin redundancy is present in patients undergoing body contouring. Traditionally, these tissues were first liposuctioned prior to being excised, termed in vivo liposuction. However, we have developed ex vivo liposuction protocols wherein the tissues are liposuctioned after they have been excised off the patient. Routine processing of harvested fat focuses on minimizing blood products in the aspirate prior to injection. This is because blood products are felt to contain pro-inflammatory products that negatively affect fat graft take. We hypothesized that fat collected by ex vivo technique provides a less bloody harvest than fat collected by in vivo technique. We quantitated blood concentrate of ex vivo versus in vivo fat aspirate by comparing the hemolysis index in 14 consecutive patients undergoing high-definition liposuction and body contouring. Comparison of hemolysis index demonstrated significant reduction in blood concentrate in ex vivo versus in vivo fat aspirate. In vivo hemolysis index demonstrated a larger median than ex vivo hemolysis index. These results confirm our clinical observation that fat harvested by ex vivo liposuction is cleaner and less blood-tinged than fat harvested by in vivo liposuction. No patients experienced complications related to fat graft infection nor fat emboli. Ex vivo liposuction has proven a safe and less blood-tinged technique for harvesting fat in patients who require excisional procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高清晰度吸脂和塑形术中的溶血指数
体外吸脂是一种新颖的技术,其中术前计划切除的组织可以在从患者身上取出后以无菌方式吸脂。切除的组织通常在腹部除皱或变型、大腿外侧除皱、臀部除皱、肱成形术、上身除皱和大腿内侧除皱中获得。当接受身体轮廓的患者存在中度至重度皮肤冗余时,进行这些折叠程序。传统上,这些组织在切除之前先被吸脂,称为体内吸脂。然而,我们已经开发出体外吸脂方案,其中组织在从患者身上切除后进行吸脂。采集脂肪的常规处理侧重于在注射前尽量减少抽吸中的血液制品。这是因为血液制品被认为含有对脂肪移植产生负面影响的促炎产物。我们假设,通过离体技术收集的脂肪比通过体内技术收集的脂肪提供更少的血腥收获。我们通过比较14例连续接受高清晰度吸脂和塑形的患者的溶血指数来定量体外和体内吸脂的血浓缩物。溶血指数的比较表明,体外吸脂与体内吸脂相比,血浓缩物显著减少。体内溶血指数的中位数比体外溶血指数的中位数大。这些结果证实了我们的临床观察,即体外吸脂术收集的脂肪比体内吸脂术收集的脂肪更清洁,血渍更少。没有患者出现与脂肪移植感染或脂肪栓塞相关的并发症。体外吸脂术已被证明是一种安全且较少血染的技术,可用于需要切除手术的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Periareolar Mastopexy: A Historical Appraisal of Technique and Further Technical Refinements Toward Reliable, Lasting, and Reproducible Results Direct Lip Lift: The Sashimi Technique Indirect Lip Lift With Modified Suspension Technique to Pyriform Ligament In Vitro Analysis of Dissolution of 18 HA-based Dermal Fillers with Tailored Hyaluronidase Dosing to Achieve Urgent Reversal of Vascular Complications Lower Blepharoplasty With Fat Transposition and Three-Vector Suspension Technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1