Sentiment analysis of government regulations regarding the implementation of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) during the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia (Case study: Air transportation mode)

A. Prisdayanti, I. Budi, A. Santoso, P. K. Putra
{"title":"Sentiment analysis of government regulations regarding the implementation of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) during the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia (Case study: Air transportation mode)","authors":"A. Prisdayanti, I. Budi, A. Santoso, P. K. Putra","doi":"10.1063/5.0107573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many people express their opinions regarding policies or rules imposed by the government through Twitter social media. This study was conducted to determine public sentiment regarding the rules for implementing the reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test as one of the requirements for using air transportation. The research was conducted using the Random Forest and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithms and the CRISP-DM research method. Twitter data used is classified into negative, neutral and positive. The results of the sentiment analysis showed that the KNN algorithm outperformed Random Forest with an accuracy value of 75.63% and the sampling technique used was stratified sampling. The results of the sentiment analysis show that the public has a negative sentiment towards the policies issued by the government. © 2022 Author(s).","PeriodicalId":298649,"journal":{"name":"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN SMART ADMINISTRATION (ICSINTESA 2021)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN SMART ADMINISTRATION (ICSINTESA 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0107573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many people express their opinions regarding policies or rules imposed by the government through Twitter social media. This study was conducted to determine public sentiment regarding the rules for implementing the reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test as one of the requirements for using air transportation. The research was conducted using the Random Forest and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithms and the CRISP-DM research method. Twitter data used is classified into negative, neutral and positive. The results of the sentiment analysis showed that the KNN algorithm outperformed Random Forest with an accuracy value of 75.63% and the sampling technique used was stratified sampling. The results of the sentiment analysis show that the public has a negative sentiment towards the policies issued by the government. © 2022 Author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼2019冠状病毒病大流行期间有关实施逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的政府法规的情绪分析(以航空运输模式为例)
许多人通过推特社交媒体表达对政府政策或规定的意见。本研究旨在了解公众对将逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测作为航空运输要求之一的规定的意见。研究采用随机森林和k近邻(KNN)算法以及CRISP-DM研究方法进行。Twitter使用的数据分为负面、中性和正面。情感分析结果表明,KNN算法优于Random Forest,准确率为75.63%,采用分层抽样的抽样技术。情绪分析的结果显示,公众对政府出台的政策持负面情绪。©2022作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevent underload and maximize PV power in the Diesel-PV-Battery hybrid system due to minimum diesel generation Classification of points and types of disruptions for efficiency of standard operating procedures repair of distribution network suppliers Predict the victory of the Freefire Esport Master League tournament using Naïve Bayes Smart agriculture based on LoRaWAN Cut-off point and multiple regression linear analysis for decision support of food security in the era of pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1