Developing the Change Agent Competencies of Occupational Therapy University Students: Using a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Approach in a Canadian Program

É. Lavoie-Trudeau, Tim Dubé, M. Beaudoin, A. Carrier
{"title":"Developing the Change Agent Competencies of Occupational Therapy University Students: Using a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Approach in a Canadian Program","authors":"É. Lavoie-Trudeau, Tim Dubé, M. Beaudoin, A. Carrier","doi":"10.26681/jote.2023.070305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Canadian occupational therapy (OT) university programs must teach change agent competencies. These include promoting social justice and empowering clients, which United States occupational therapists also do. Change agent competency requirements are challenging to teach and involve multidisciplinary knowledge and non-traditional skills. As few occupational therapists feel competent to act as change agents, university programs must engage in a scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) approach and identify areas of improvement. The aim of this study, informed by SoTL, was to document, as described by participants, the pedagogical activities related to teaching the change agent role in an OT program in Canada and explore possible curricular improvements. Two online 90-minute focus group meetings were held: one with ten teaching team members, the other with six current and past students. Participants were questioned regarding current formal and informal curricular activities, barriers that influenced competency development, and activities that could help improve it. Data were analyzed thematically. Actual informative teaching activities, such as ethics and multicultural courses, were deemed helpful but insufficient, with only one transformative course in the curriculum. Barriers such as a rigid, biomedical-based program structure also affected competency acquisition. Solutions to improve acquisition included mentorship and recognition of relevant extracurricular projects by the programs. SoTL offers a reflective lens to learn from collective experiences. This study showed the importance of involving students and faculty in program development and delivery improvements in order to better support educators and program administrators in their mission to meet the needs of vulnerable populations.","PeriodicalId":304291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Education","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2023.070305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Canadian occupational therapy (OT) university programs must teach change agent competencies. These include promoting social justice and empowering clients, which United States occupational therapists also do. Change agent competency requirements are challenging to teach and involve multidisciplinary knowledge and non-traditional skills. As few occupational therapists feel competent to act as change agents, university programs must engage in a scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) approach and identify areas of improvement. The aim of this study, informed by SoTL, was to document, as described by participants, the pedagogical activities related to teaching the change agent role in an OT program in Canada and explore possible curricular improvements. Two online 90-minute focus group meetings were held: one with ten teaching team members, the other with six current and past students. Participants were questioned regarding current formal and informal curricular activities, barriers that influenced competency development, and activities that could help improve it. Data were analyzed thematically. Actual informative teaching activities, such as ethics and multicultural courses, were deemed helpful but insufficient, with only one transformative course in the curriculum. Barriers such as a rigid, biomedical-based program structure also affected competency acquisition. Solutions to improve acquisition included mentorship and recognition of relevant extracurricular projects by the programs. SoTL offers a reflective lens to learn from collective experiences. This study showed the importance of involving students and faculty in program development and delivery improvements in order to better support educators and program administrators in their mission to meet the needs of vulnerable populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展职业治疗大学生的变革推动者能力:在加拿大项目中使用教学和学习方法
摘要加拿大职业治疗(OT)大学课程必须教授变革主体能力。这些措施包括促进社会公正和赋予客户权力,这也是美国职业治疗师所做的。变革代理人的能力要求是具有挑战性的,涉及多学科知识和非传统技能。由于很少有职业治疗师认为自己有能力充当变革的推动者,大学课程必须采用教学和学习(SoTL)方法,并确定改进的领域。这项研究的目的,由SoTL通知,是记录,正如参与者所描述的,在加拿大的一个OT项目中,与教授变革推动者角色相关的教学活动,并探索可能的课程改进。我们举行了两次90分钟的在线焦点小组会议:一次是10名教学团队成员,另一次是6名在校生和往届学生。参与者被问及当前正式和非正式的课程活动,影响能力发展的障碍,以及有助于提高能力的活动。数据按主题进行分析。实际的信息教学活动,如伦理和多元文化课程,被认为是有帮助的,但不够,课程中只有一门变革性课程。诸如僵化的、基于生物医学的项目结构等障碍也影响了能力的获得。提高获取的解决方案包括指导和认可相关的课外项目。SoTL提供了一个从集体经验中学习的反思镜头。这项研究显示了让学生和教师参与项目开发和交付改进的重要性,以便更好地支持教育工作者和项目管理人员履行他们的使命,满足弱势群体的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Communication and Collaboration Among Healthcare Students Experiential Education in Advocacy for Occupational Therapy Students: Didactic Approaches and Learning Outcomes A Framework for Creating and Using Teaching Philosophy Statements to Guide Reflective and Inclusive Instruction Using a Flipped Classroom to Teach Evidence-Based Practice to Entry-Level Occupational Therapy Students Stress, Mindfulness and Occupational Engagement: A Pilot Study of the HOME Protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1