Comparative study of the comfort in patients rehabilitated with three types of partial dentures

F. Bechir, Ilinca Suciu
{"title":"Comparative study of the comfort in patients rehabilitated with three types of partial dentures","authors":"F. Bechir, Ilinca Suciu","doi":"10.2478/asmj-2019-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: At present, the researchers are targeted to improve and increase the biocompatibility of dental materials that are in direct contact with biological tissues. The biocompatibility of the dental materials that contact the tissues of the oral cavity present relevance for the patient, clinician, dental technician, and manufacturer. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was represented by the comparative research regarding the comfort of the patients wearing removable partial prostheses with clasps made of wire and flexible polymers. Material and Methods. Patients wearing partial dentures from Meliodent heat-cured acrylic resins with wipla wire clasps, flexible partial dentures made from Valplast and dentures with clasps of CuSil silicone rubber participated in this study. The research was performed on 3 groups, of 8 patients each, in which comfort levels (according to 5 criteria) were determined, after 6, 12, 18, respectively 24 months of the partial removable prostheses insertion in the oral cavity. Results. Presence of decubitus lesions of the oral mucosa in the clasps areas was noticed mostly in the Valplast polyamide dentures (37.5%), existence of color changes at the base of prostheses and of clasps area appeared in 37.5% of the third group (CuSil PAD) patients, no patient included in the study presented allergic reactions and at the third and fourth recall, only 1 patient of all groups complained of unpleasant taste in the oral cavity. Conclusion. The removable prosthetic restorations with clasps made of flexible polymers and CuSil gaskets of silicone rubber, although initially much more comfortable and therefore much better accepted by patients, after two years were no longer active, could not be activated and necessited technical restorations, compared to those made of wipla wire clasps, which were activated with pliers, or, in the case of fracture, were replaced by the technician in the dental laboratory.","PeriodicalId":120290,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Marisiensis Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Marisiensis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/asmj-2019-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: At present, the researchers are targeted to improve and increase the biocompatibility of dental materials that are in direct contact with biological tissues. The biocompatibility of the dental materials that contact the tissues of the oral cavity present relevance for the patient, clinician, dental technician, and manufacturer. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was represented by the comparative research regarding the comfort of the patients wearing removable partial prostheses with clasps made of wire and flexible polymers. Material and Methods. Patients wearing partial dentures from Meliodent heat-cured acrylic resins with wipla wire clasps, flexible partial dentures made from Valplast and dentures with clasps of CuSil silicone rubber participated in this study. The research was performed on 3 groups, of 8 patients each, in which comfort levels (according to 5 criteria) were determined, after 6, 12, 18, respectively 24 months of the partial removable prostheses insertion in the oral cavity. Results. Presence of decubitus lesions of the oral mucosa in the clasps areas was noticed mostly in the Valplast polyamide dentures (37.5%), existence of color changes at the base of prostheses and of clasps area appeared in 37.5% of the third group (CuSil PAD) patients, no patient included in the study presented allergic reactions and at the third and fourth recall, only 1 patient of all groups complained of unpleasant taste in the oral cavity. Conclusion. The removable prosthetic restorations with clasps made of flexible polymers and CuSil gaskets of silicone rubber, although initially much more comfortable and therefore much better accepted by patients, after two years were no longer active, could not be activated and necessited technical restorations, compared to those made of wipla wire clasps, which were activated with pliers, or, in the case of fracture, were replaced by the technician in the dental laboratory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种类型局部义齿修复患者舒适性的比较研究
摘要导读:目前,研究人员的目标是改善和增加与生物组织直接接触的牙科材料的生物相容性。与口腔组织接触的牙科材料的生物相容性对患者、临床医生、牙科技师和制造商都具有相关性。研究目的:本研究的目的是通过对使用金属丝卡环和柔性聚合物卡环的可拆卸部分义肢患者的舒适性进行比较研究。材料和方法。本研究采用Meliodent热固化丙烯酸树脂义齿配wipla金属卡环、Valplast柔性义齿和CuSil硅橡胶卡环义齿。研究分为3组,每组8例患者,分别在部分可摘义齿插入口腔6、12、18、24个月后,根据5项标准测定患者的舒适度。结果。Valplast聚酰胺义齿患者(37.5%)最多发现卡环区口腔黏膜出现褥疮病变,第三组(CuSil PAD)患者中37.5%出现假体基部和卡环区颜色变化,研究中没有患者出现过敏反应,第三次和第四次回忆时,所有组中只有1例患者抱怨口腔味道不佳。结论。使用柔性聚合物和硅橡胶CuSil衬垫制成的可移动义肢修复体,虽然最初更舒适,因此更容易被患者接受,但两年后,与使用钳子激活的wipla金属丝卡环相比,不再活跃,无法激活,需要技术修复,或者在骨折的情况下,由牙科实验室的技术人员更换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic Review Regarding The Difference In Dental Plaque Accumulation Associated With Fixed Orthodontic Retainers And Vacuum Formed Removable Retainer. Evaluation of the therapeutic performance of ICON infiltration resin in the treatment of White Spot Lesions in esthetic dental areas. Clinical Report. Occlusal Concepts in Implantology. Clinical and practical aspects of the gingival smile. A questionnaire-based survey. Quantification of flowability and hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1