Interactions among PCK Components of Pre-service Secondary Chemistry Teachers Considered in Processes of Making Written Test Items

Taehee Noh, Jaesung Park, Hunsik Kang
{"title":"Interactions among PCK Components of Pre-service Secondary Chemistry Teachers Considered in Processes of Making Written Test Items","authors":"Taehee Noh, Jaesung Park, Hunsik Kang","doi":"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.5.0769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the interactions among the PCK components of pre-service secondary chemistry teachers considered in the processes of making written test items individually and in small groups. The processes of making written test items individually for 8 pre-service teachers was studied through the think-aloud method. The analysis of the results revealed that the ‘assessment in science education’ of the five PCK components was most frequently used in making test items. ‘Curriculum for science education,’ ‘subject matter knowledge,’ and ‘students’ were also frequently used although fewer than the previous component. However, ‘instructional strategies and instruction for science education’ was hardly used. The integrations between two or three components with various types were frequently found. However, integrations among four to five components were not found. The processes of making written test items in two small groups consisting of four pre-service teachers were observed. The analysis of the results revealed that the PCK components used in small groups were similar to those in the individual processes. However, ‘curriculum for science education’ was less frequently used, and the numbers of subcategories used at a relatively high frequency increased from other four components in small groups. In the aspects of integration, the proportion of the integrations between two components decreased and that for three components increased compared with those in the individual processes. The integrations among four or five components were also newly found. However, the integrations of ‘curriculum for science education’ with the other components were less frequently found. The integrations of ‘instructional strategies and instruction for science education’ with other components were still hardly found.","PeriodicalId":107400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.5.0769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the interactions among the PCK components of pre-service secondary chemistry teachers considered in the processes of making written test items individually and in small groups. The processes of making written test items individually for 8 pre-service teachers was studied through the think-aloud method. The analysis of the results revealed that the ‘assessment in science education’ of the five PCK components was most frequently used in making test items. ‘Curriculum for science education,’ ‘subject matter knowledge,’ and ‘students’ were also frequently used although fewer than the previous component. However, ‘instructional strategies and instruction for science education’ was hardly used. The integrations between two or three components with various types were frequently found. However, integrations among four to five components were not found. The processes of making written test items in two small groups consisting of four pre-service teachers were observed. The analysis of the results revealed that the PCK components used in small groups were similar to those in the individual processes. However, ‘curriculum for science education’ was less frequently used, and the numbers of subcategories used at a relatively high frequency increased from other four components in small groups. In the aspects of integration, the proportion of the integrations between two components decreased and that for three components increased compared with those in the individual processes. The integrations among four or five components were also newly found. However, the integrations of ‘curriculum for science education’ with the other components were less frequently found. The integrations of ‘instructional strategies and instruction for science education’ with other components were still hardly found.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职前中学化学教师PCK成分在笔试试题制作过程中的交互作用
本研究考察了职前中学化学教师在单独和小组编写笔试项目过程中PCK成分之间的相互作用。以8名职前教师为研究对象,采用有声思维法进行了笔试单项制作过程的研究。对结果的分析显示,“科学教育评估”的五个PCK组成部分是在制作测试项目时最常用的。“科学教育课程”、“学科知识”和“学生”也被频繁使用,尽管比前一个组成部分要少。然而,“科学教育的教学策略与教学”却鲜有提及。经常发现两个或三个不同类型的组件之间的集成。然而,没有发现四到五个组件之间的集成。观察由4名职前教师组成的2个小组的笔试题制作过程。对结果的分析表明,在小群体中使用的PCK成分与在单个过程中使用的PCK成分相似。然而,“科学教育课程”的使用频率较低,并且在小组中使用频率相对较高的子类别的数量比其他四个组成部分增加。在集成方面,与单个流程的集成相比,两个组件之间的集成比例降低,三个组件之间的集成比例增加。4个或5个组件之间的集成也是新发现的。然而,“科学教育课程”与其他组成部分的整合却不太常见。“科学教育的教学策略和教学”与其他组成部分的整合仍然很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 적용에 대한 초·중학교 교사의 인식과 요구 STEAM 기반 학생 연구 활동 분석을 통한 과학 교육에 대한 시사점 고찰 한국, 미국, 영국, 싱가포르의 과학 교육과정 비교 - 에너지 개념을 중심으로 - A Case Study on Application of the NABI Program to Realize the 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character' Item Response Analysis of Energy as a Cross-Cutting Concept for Grades 3 to 9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1