Relationship between statistical methods and design, through Kansei engineering.

Ainoa Abella Garcia, L. Marco-Almagro, L. Clèries
{"title":"Relationship between statistical methods and design, through Kansei engineering.","authors":"Ainoa Abella Garcia, L. Marco-Almagro, L. Clèries","doi":"10.5821/conference-9788419184849.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both the disciplines of design and statistics have promoted projects and research with clear objectives in their field, but for the other discipline, they have been difficult or challenging to fully understand. \n \nIn design, there are a large number of projects that provoke a reaction in spectators or users as they have a spectacular scope and impact, but at a statistical level, their results add little value. On the other hand, in some of the models and applications that are often used in statistics, the requirements are highly complex and numerous. This makes it difficult to put theory into practice since experiences or experiments that are so complex and difficult to manage cannot be carried out. In addition, the subsequent reporting process for non-experts is difficult to understand due to a large amount of information as well as on poorly designed presentations at times. \n \nAfter understanding the limitations that the two disciplines face, their ability to work together and turn one another’s weaknesses into a more complete and holistic solution is evident. Kansei engineering is also a good example since it is a complex design tool, and the only way to advance it incorporating the use of data is through collaboration between designers and statisticians. In this paper, the Data Collection Toolkit is presented as a result of applying Kansei Engineering to unite these two disciplines including some methodologies, resources, and tools for designers for each step.","PeriodicalId":433529,"journal":{"name":"9th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"9th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5821/conference-9788419184849.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both the disciplines of design and statistics have promoted projects and research with clear objectives in their field, but for the other discipline, they have been difficult or challenging to fully understand. In design, there are a large number of projects that provoke a reaction in spectators or users as they have a spectacular scope and impact, but at a statistical level, their results add little value. On the other hand, in some of the models and applications that are often used in statistics, the requirements are highly complex and numerous. This makes it difficult to put theory into practice since experiences or experiments that are so complex and difficult to manage cannot be carried out. In addition, the subsequent reporting process for non-experts is difficult to understand due to a large amount of information as well as on poorly designed presentations at times. After understanding the limitations that the two disciplines face, their ability to work together and turn one another’s weaknesses into a more complete and holistic solution is evident. Kansei engineering is also a good example since it is a complex design tool, and the only way to advance it incorporating the use of data is through collaboration between designers and statisticians. In this paper, the Data Collection Toolkit is presented as a result of applying Kansei Engineering to unite these two disciplines including some methodologies, resources, and tools for designers for each step.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过感性工学,统计方法与设计之间的关系。
设计和统计学这两个学科都在各自的领域中推动了具有明确目标的项目和研究,但对于其他学科来说,要完全理解它们是困难的或具有挑战性的。在设计中,有大量的项目会引起观众或用户的反应,因为它们具有巨大的范围和影响,但在统计层面上,它们的结果几乎没有价值。另一方面,在统计中经常使用的一些模型和应用程序中,需求是高度复杂和大量的。这使得理论难以付诸实践,因为如此复杂和难以管理的经验或实验无法进行。此外,由于大量的信息以及有时设计不佳的报告,非专家随后的报告过程难以理解。在了解了这两个学科所面临的限制之后,它们协同工作并将彼此的弱点转化为更完整、更全面的解决方案的能力是显而易见的。感性工学也是一个很好的例子,因为它是一种复杂的设计工具,而将其纳入数据使用的唯一方法是通过设计师和统计学家之间的合作。在本文中,数据收集工具包是应用感性工学将这两个学科结合起来的结果,其中包括为设计师提供的每个步骤的一些方法,资源和工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teamwork in context of diversity A Study on the Relationship Between Decision-making Speed and Kansei Through Data Visualization Visualization of affective information in music using chironomie The relationship between leisure activities and subjective wellbeing among middle-aged chinese people Relationship between behaviors for purchasing OTC medicines and literacy of consumers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1