13 Current Media Business Models in the Digital Age – the Takeaways for Bulgaria

Ivo Indjov
{"title":"13 Current Media Business Models in the Digital Age – the Takeaways for Bulgaria","authors":"Ivo Indjov","doi":"10.54664/upvp8877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study seeks an answer to the current problem of the deepening global crisis of classic media business models in the digital age and the need to seek sustainable new forms of financing. This state of the journalistic media, resp. of quality journalism is the result of competition from the Internet and major online platforms, but also from acute financial crises, the most recent one caused by Covid-19. They hit the two market foundations of the media company the hardest – advertising and sales. Financially afflicted media repel citizens and are a direct threat to democracy. Weakened, they fall under external dependence, and cannot control the politicians and those in power; neither can they oppose the viral spread of misinformation and fake news on social media. The main research question is “Is it possible – and in what way – to save the media financially in the digital age?” 13 current media-financing models with an emphasis on digital media have been studied - beyond advertising, classified ads etc., which until recently ensured the well-being of the press and television. Two different media business models were also considered: taz – a successful German left-wing alternative newspaper based on cooperative ownership and a solidary model of attracting readers, and “Capital” – a Bulgarian business-oriented medium that successfully applies new forms of financing. Both editions focus on digital transition. The elements of comparison show that for several reasons the “taz model”, which provides a much more direct and emotional connection with the readership, is not applicable to Bulgaria in the medium term. The main conclusion of the study is that in order to survive in the digital age, journalistic media must have a flexible pluralistic funding model. Depending on the nature of the media, its target groups and the specifics of society, it may contain only part or a wider range of the following main sources of funding: market; state / public funding; structures of civil society and citizens.","PeriodicalId":346008,"journal":{"name":"21st Century Media and Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"21st Century Media and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54664/upvp8877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study seeks an answer to the current problem of the deepening global crisis of classic media business models in the digital age and the need to seek sustainable new forms of financing. This state of the journalistic media, resp. of quality journalism is the result of competition from the Internet and major online platforms, but also from acute financial crises, the most recent one caused by Covid-19. They hit the two market foundations of the media company the hardest – advertising and sales. Financially afflicted media repel citizens and are a direct threat to democracy. Weakened, they fall under external dependence, and cannot control the politicians and those in power; neither can they oppose the viral spread of misinformation and fake news on social media. The main research question is “Is it possible – and in what way – to save the media financially in the digital age?” 13 current media-financing models with an emphasis on digital media have been studied - beyond advertising, classified ads etc., which until recently ensured the well-being of the press and television. Two different media business models were also considered: taz – a successful German left-wing alternative newspaper based on cooperative ownership and a solidary model of attracting readers, and “Capital” – a Bulgarian business-oriented medium that successfully applies new forms of financing. Both editions focus on digital transition. The elements of comparison show that for several reasons the “taz model”, which provides a much more direct and emotional connection with the readership, is not applicable to Bulgaria in the medium term. The main conclusion of the study is that in order to survive in the digital age, journalistic media must have a flexible pluralistic funding model. Depending on the nature of the media, its target groups and the specifics of society, it may contain only part or a wider range of the following main sources of funding: market; state / public funding; structures of civil society and citizens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字时代的当前媒体商业模式——保加利亚的启示
在数字时代,经典媒体商业模式的全球危机日益加深,需要寻求可持续的新融资形式,这项研究旨在为当前的问题找到答案。这是新闻媒体的现状。新闻质量的下降是互联网和主要在线平台竞争的结果,也是严重金融危机的结果,最近的一次金融危机就是由Covid-19引起的。他们对这家媒体公司的两个市场基础——广告和销售——造成了最沉重的打击。经济困难的媒体排斥公民,是对民主的直接威胁。被削弱后,他们受制于外部依赖,无法控制政治家和当权者;他们也不能反对社交媒体上错误信息和假新闻的病毒式传播。主要的研究问题是“在数字时代,是否有可能——以及以何种方式——在财务上拯救媒体?”“我们研究了目前以数字媒体为重点的媒体融资模式——除了广告、分类广告等,这些模式直到最近还保证了媒体和电视的福祉。会议还考虑了两种不同的媒体商业模式:taz——一份成功的德国左翼另类报纸,基于合作所有制和吸引读者的团结模式,以及“资本”——一份成功应用新融资形式的保加利亚商业导向媒体。两个版本都侧重于数字化转型。比较的因素表明,由于若干原因,“taz模式”虽然与读者有更直接和情感上的联系,但在中期并不适用于保加利亚。研究的主要结论是,为了在数字时代生存,新闻媒体必须有一个灵活的多元化的资助模式。根据媒体的性质、目标群体和社会的具体情况,它可能只包含以下主要资金来源的一部分或更大范围:市场;国家/公共资金;公民社会和公民的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Media View of Traditions in Modern Bulgarian Society Interdiscursivity of New Media (Following the Content Examples of the Belarusian Media Holding “Culture and Art”) Georgi Yurukov: The Underappreciated and Forgotten Book Publisher Local Festivals through the Eyes of the Media Influencers as Creators of Valuable Brand Content
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1