The Role of Law in Global Value Chains: A Research Manifesto

G. Baars, Jennifer Bair, Liam Campling, Dan Danielsen, D. Davis, Klaas Hendrik Eller, Dezso Farkas, Tomaso Ferrando, Jason Jackson, David Hansen-Miller, Elizabeth Havice, Claire Mummé, Jesse Salah Ovadia, D. Quentin, Brishen Rogers, J. Salminen, Á. Santos, B. Selwyn, Marlese von Broembsen, L. White
{"title":"The Role of Law in Global Value Chains: A Research Manifesto","authors":"G. Baars, Jennifer Bair, Liam Campling, Dan Danielsen, D. Davis, Klaas Hendrik Eller, Dezso Farkas, Tomaso Ferrando, Jason Jackson, David Hansen-Miller, Elizabeth Havice, Claire Mummé, Jesse Salah Ovadia, D. Quentin, Brishen Rogers, J. Salminen, Á. Santos, B. Selwyn, Marlese von Broembsen, L. White","doi":"10.1093/LRIL/LRW003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most scholars attribute the development and ubiquity of global value chains to economic forces, treating law as an exogenous factor, if at all. By contrast, we assert the centrality of legal regimes and private ordering mechanisms to the creation, structure, geography, distributive effects and governance of Global Value Chains (GVCs), and thereby seek to establish the study of law and GVCs as rich and important terrain for research in its own right. \n \nAcross a growing number of sectors and industries, value production is not just transnational in scope; it is organised and coordinated via global networks that link activities across as well as within firms and nations. These networks are increasingly referred to as ‘Global Value Chains’, or GVCs. The asserted causes of this phenomenon are multiple, and scholars debate which deserves designation as primary.1 We begin from the premise that GVCs are not only the product of shifting economic conditions. They also arise as firms engage dynamically with multiple, overlapping and often conflicting local, national, regional and transnational legal regimes, soft-law normative orders and private ordering mechanisms (hereinafter collectively described as ‘law’).2 \n \nThis article seeks to establish the importance for both scholars and policymakers of investigating some of the complex ways in which the law shapes and is shaped by GVCs. The research agenda articulated here emerged from a series of ongoing conversations among a group of legal scholars, sociologists and political economists that first met in June 2014 under the auspices of the IGLP at Harvard University. For the most part, legal scholarship has only summarily or incidentally analysed GVCs, and similarly, GVCs scholars outside law have not made law a focal point of their theoretical or empirical analyses. We believe that placing law at the centre of the analysis of what have historically been treated as primarily ‘economic structures’ will not only enrich our understanding of the shape, nature and dynamic character of GVCs, but will also help to illuminate the complex inter-relationship between law and global political economy more broadly. \n \nWe begin with a broad description of the question at the heart of our collective inquiry: how does law shape the structure and organisation of production globally and how is law impacted through this process? To make this meta-question more concrete, we articulate three thematic starting points for exploration of the relationship between law and GVCs: law and the geography of GVCs; law and the production and distribution of value and power in GVCs; and law and the coordination of GVCs (the latter being a process referred to in the GVC literature as ‘governance’). We focus our research inquiry into the role of law in global structures of production on GVCs both because of their ubiquity in modern capitalism and the rich variety of extant scholarship (largely outside the field of law) exploring GVCs in a variety of industries and contexts. This combination of factors makes GVCs a rich source for research both empirically and theoretically. In an effort to suggest, albeit in a highly preliminary way, what a legal analysis of GVCs might entail, and what insights this line of inquiry might yield, we include brief descriptions of several ongoing research projects initiated by group members. Our goal is to invite scholars in law and related disciplines to begin to view the study of law and global production as an important and worthy field of research in its own right.","PeriodicalId":365224,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LRIL/LRW003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

Abstract

Most scholars attribute the development and ubiquity of global value chains to economic forces, treating law as an exogenous factor, if at all. By contrast, we assert the centrality of legal regimes and private ordering mechanisms to the creation, structure, geography, distributive effects and governance of Global Value Chains (GVCs), and thereby seek to establish the study of law and GVCs as rich and important terrain for research in its own right. Across a growing number of sectors and industries, value production is not just transnational in scope; it is organised and coordinated via global networks that link activities across as well as within firms and nations. These networks are increasingly referred to as ‘Global Value Chains’, or GVCs. The asserted causes of this phenomenon are multiple, and scholars debate which deserves designation as primary.1 We begin from the premise that GVCs are not only the product of shifting economic conditions. They also arise as firms engage dynamically with multiple, overlapping and often conflicting local, national, regional and transnational legal regimes, soft-law normative orders and private ordering mechanisms (hereinafter collectively described as ‘law’).2 This article seeks to establish the importance for both scholars and policymakers of investigating some of the complex ways in which the law shapes and is shaped by GVCs. The research agenda articulated here emerged from a series of ongoing conversations among a group of legal scholars, sociologists and political economists that first met in June 2014 under the auspices of the IGLP at Harvard University. For the most part, legal scholarship has only summarily or incidentally analysed GVCs, and similarly, GVCs scholars outside law have not made law a focal point of their theoretical or empirical analyses. We believe that placing law at the centre of the analysis of what have historically been treated as primarily ‘economic structures’ will not only enrich our understanding of the shape, nature and dynamic character of GVCs, but will also help to illuminate the complex inter-relationship between law and global political economy more broadly. We begin with a broad description of the question at the heart of our collective inquiry: how does law shape the structure and organisation of production globally and how is law impacted through this process? To make this meta-question more concrete, we articulate three thematic starting points for exploration of the relationship between law and GVCs: law and the geography of GVCs; law and the production and distribution of value and power in GVCs; and law and the coordination of GVCs (the latter being a process referred to in the GVC literature as ‘governance’). We focus our research inquiry into the role of law in global structures of production on GVCs both because of their ubiquity in modern capitalism and the rich variety of extant scholarship (largely outside the field of law) exploring GVCs in a variety of industries and contexts. This combination of factors makes GVCs a rich source for research both empirically and theoretically. In an effort to suggest, albeit in a highly preliminary way, what a legal analysis of GVCs might entail, and what insights this line of inquiry might yield, we include brief descriptions of several ongoing research projects initiated by group members. Our goal is to invite scholars in law and related disciplines to begin to view the study of law and global production as an important and worthy field of research in its own right.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律在全球价值链中的作用:一份研究宣言
大多数学者将全球价值链的发展和无处不在归因于经济力量,将法律视为一种外生因素,如果有的话。相比之下,我们主张法律制度和私人秩序机制对全球价值链的创造、结构、地理、分配效应和治理具有中心地位,从而寻求将法律和全球价值链的研究建立为其本身丰富而重要的研究领域。在越来越多的部门和行业中,价值生产不仅是跨国的;它是通过全球网络组织和协调的,这些网络将企业和国家之间以及企业和国家内部的活动联系起来。这些网络越来越多地被称为“全球价值链”或GVCs。造成这一现象的原因有很多,学者们争论哪一个应该被称为主要原因我们的前提是,全球价值链不仅仅是经济状况变化的产物。它们也出现在公司动态参与多个,重叠和经常冲突的地方,国家,区域和跨国法律制度,软法规范秩序和私人秩序机制(以下统称为“法律”)本文旨在说明,对于学者和政策制定者来说,研究全球价值链对法律形成和被塑造的一些复杂方式具有重要意义。2014年6月,在哈佛大学IGLP的主持下,一群法律学者、社会学家和政治经济学家进行了一系列正在进行的对话,并在这里阐述了研究议程。在大多数情况下,法律学者只是简要或偶然地分析了全球价值链,同样,法律以外的全球价值链学者也没有将法律作为其理论或实证分析的焦点。我们认为,将法律置于历史上主要被视为“经济结构”的分析的中心,不仅会丰富我们对全球价值链的形态、性质和动态特征的理解,而且还将有助于更广泛地阐明法律与全球政治经济之间复杂的相互关系。我们首先对我们集体探究的核心问题进行了广泛的描述:法律如何塑造全球生产的结构和组织,以及法律如何通过这一过程受到影响?为了使这个元问题更加具体,我们为探索法律与全球价值链之间的关系阐明了三个主题起点:法律与全球价值链的地理;规律与全球价值链中价值和权力的生产和分配;法律和全球价值链的协调(后者是全球价值链文献中称为“治理”的过程)。我们将研究重点放在全球价值链的全球生产结构中法律的作用上,这既是因为它们在现代资本主义中无处不在,也是因为在各种行业和背景下探索全球价值链的现有学术(主要在法律领域之外)丰富多样。这些因素的结合使得全球价值链成为丰富的实证和理论研究资源。尽管以一种非常初步的方式,但为了表明对全球价值链的法律分析可能需要什么,以及这条调查路线可能产生什么见解,我们包括了对小组成员发起的几个正在进行的研究项目的简要描述。我们的目标是邀请法律和相关学科的学者开始将法律和全球生产的研究视为一个重要而有价值的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact and Application of the UNCITRAL Rules in Domestic Jurisdictions An Analysis and Assessment of China's Investment in Ghana. The (Ir)relevance of Transnational Public Policy in Investment Treaty Arbitration Foreign Investment Screening Beyond the COVID-19 Challenge: Overcoming the Emergency Capacity to Borrow and Sovereign Debt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1