Interpreting Legal Transfers: The Implications for Law and Development

P. Nicholson, J. Gillespie
{"title":"Interpreting Legal Transfers: The Implications for Law and Development","authors":"P. Nicholson, J. Gillespie","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1914841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over recent years, the global diffusion of legal and regulatory regimes has dramatically increased. Much of the increase is the direct result of initiatives funded in the name of ‘law and development’. The world over, domestic legislation and regulatory reforms borrow heavily from international and foreign legal systems, and legal transfers have become the main inspiration for change. And yet after decades (if not centuries, if the colonial projects are included) of law reform projects, there is mixed evidence that legal transfers induce recipients to change in the ways envisaged by legal donors. Much has been written about the failures of law reform by law and development, comparative law and regulatory perspectives. This chapter is the introduction to an edited book titled 'Law and Development and the Global Discourses of Legal Transfers', to be published by Cambridge University Press in 2012. The book is significant because it brings together leading scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds to assess the strengths and weaknesses of these different disciplinary approaches. It aims to demonstrate how a synthesis of law and development, regulatory theory and legal transplantation theory – disciplines which have, to date, remained intellectually isolated from each other – can produce a more nuanced understanding about the types of legal transfers that are most likely to succeed.","PeriodicalId":375754,"journal":{"name":"Public International Law eJournal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public International Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1914841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over recent years, the global diffusion of legal and regulatory regimes has dramatically increased. Much of the increase is the direct result of initiatives funded in the name of ‘law and development’. The world over, domestic legislation and regulatory reforms borrow heavily from international and foreign legal systems, and legal transfers have become the main inspiration for change. And yet after decades (if not centuries, if the colonial projects are included) of law reform projects, there is mixed evidence that legal transfers induce recipients to change in the ways envisaged by legal donors. Much has been written about the failures of law reform by law and development, comparative law and regulatory perspectives. This chapter is the introduction to an edited book titled 'Law and Development and the Global Discourses of Legal Transfers', to be published by Cambridge University Press in 2012. The book is significant because it brings together leading scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds to assess the strengths and weaknesses of these different disciplinary approaches. It aims to demonstrate how a synthesis of law and development, regulatory theory and legal transplantation theory – disciplines which have, to date, remained intellectually isolated from each other – can produce a more nuanced understanding about the types of legal transfers that are most likely to succeed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读法律转让:对法律和发展的影响
近年来,法律和管理制度的全球扩散已大大增加。这一增长很大程度上是在“法律与发展”的名义下资助的倡议的直接结果。在世界各地,国内立法和管制改革大量借鉴国际和外国法律制度,法律转让已成为变革的主要动力。然而,经过几十年(如果不算几个世纪,如果包括殖民项目的话)的法律改革项目,有各种各样的证据表明,法律转让促使受援国按照法律捐助者设想的方式进行改变。从法律和发展、比较法和监管的角度,已经有很多关于法律改革失败的文章。这一章是一本名为《法律与发展以及法律转让的全球话语》的编辑书的介绍,该书将于2012年由剑桥大学出版社出版。这本书很重要,因为它汇集了来自不同学科背景的主要学者来评估这些不同学科方法的优缺点。它的目的是证明,将法律与发展、管制理论和法律移植理论(迄今为止在智力上彼此隔离的学科)综合起来,如何能够对最有可能成功的法律转让的类型产生更细致的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Dual‐Nature Thesis: Which Dualism? Legality and the Legal Relation Soldiers as Public Officials: A Moral Justification for Combatant Immunity A Pragmatic Reconstruction of Law's Claim to Authority Ownership, Use, and Exclusivity: The Kantian Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1