5PSQ-005 Analysis of the use of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of COVID-19 in clinical practice: a weapon in the fight against the pandemic, alongside vaccination

G. Pellegrino, E. Grande, E. Bersia, E. Bastonero, M. Rebora, C. Fruttero
{"title":"5PSQ-005 Analysis of the use of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of COVID-19 in clinical practice: a weapon in the fight against the pandemic, alongside vaccination","authors":"G. Pellegrino, E. Grande, E. Bersia, E. Bastonero, M. Rebora, C. Fruttero","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importanceVaccines are emerging as a fundamental tool in the prevention of COVID-19 disease but are not decisive in treating it, once contracted. Anti COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies (MAb) define a valuable and parallel resource for the treatment of coronavirus infection so it is useful to monitor the usage data, adverse reactions (ADRs) and percentage of hospitalisations after treatment.Aim and objectivesPurpose of the work was to provide data on safety and efficacy of anti-COVID MAb in consideration of their use in current clinical practice.Material and methodsUsing a home-made database, the pharmacy extrapolated and reprocessed the data relating to the reports of patient recruitment by local and hospital clinicians, the number of patients who were treated, the specific therapies administered (bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab/etesevimab or casirivimab/imdevimab) and ADRs reported by doctors.In parallel, the infectious diseases department monitored the percentage of patients who still needed hospitalisation after the infusion of MAb.ResultsMost of the recruitment reports were received from general doctors (82% vs 18% from hospitals) and, from March 2021 to September 2021, 104 patients were treated: 48 patients (46.2%) with bamlanivimab/etesevimab, 55 (52.9%) with casirivimab/imdevimab and 1 (0.9%) with bamlanivimab. 67% of patients were not vaccinated while 33% received at least one dose of vaccine (58%: first dose;42%: two doses). The main comorbidity found was the cardiological/cerebral/vascular type.Following outpatient dosing, 2 ADRs have been reported: an emetic episode after bamlanivimab infusion and a subacute antero-septal myocardial infarction with acute pulmonary oedema occurring within hours after administration of casirivimab/imdevimab and in the presence of a septic event of bacterial origin. 9% of patients treated with anti-COVID-19 MAb still required hospitalisation due to COVID-19;the other patients recovered completely.Conclusion and relevanceTogether with the home care protocol and vaccines, MAb constitute a valid weapon in the early phase of COVID-19 disease. It is an important opportunity because it allows the virus to be faced in an active way, without waiting for the worsening of the patient’s clinical condition, and with a synergistic approach of hospital and territory that join forces against this great infectious disease challenge.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":393937,"journal":{"name":"Section 7: Post Congress additions","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Section 7: Post Congress additions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importanceVaccines are emerging as a fundamental tool in the prevention of COVID-19 disease but are not decisive in treating it, once contracted. Anti COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies (MAb) define a valuable and parallel resource for the treatment of coronavirus infection so it is useful to monitor the usage data, adverse reactions (ADRs) and percentage of hospitalisations after treatment.Aim and objectivesPurpose of the work was to provide data on safety and efficacy of anti-COVID MAb in consideration of their use in current clinical practice.Material and methodsUsing a home-made database, the pharmacy extrapolated and reprocessed the data relating to the reports of patient recruitment by local and hospital clinicians, the number of patients who were treated, the specific therapies administered (bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab/etesevimab or casirivimab/imdevimab) and ADRs reported by doctors.In parallel, the infectious diseases department monitored the percentage of patients who still needed hospitalisation after the infusion of MAb.ResultsMost of the recruitment reports were received from general doctors (82% vs 18% from hospitals) and, from March 2021 to September 2021, 104 patients were treated: 48 patients (46.2%) with bamlanivimab/etesevimab, 55 (52.9%) with casirivimab/imdevimab and 1 (0.9%) with bamlanivimab. 67% of patients were not vaccinated while 33% received at least one dose of vaccine (58%: first dose;42%: two doses). The main comorbidity found was the cardiological/cerebral/vascular type.Following outpatient dosing, 2 ADRs have been reported: an emetic episode after bamlanivimab infusion and a subacute antero-septal myocardial infarction with acute pulmonary oedema occurring within hours after administration of casirivimab/imdevimab and in the presence of a septic event of bacterial origin. 9% of patients treated with anti-COVID-19 MAb still required hospitalisation due to COVID-19;the other patients recovered completely.Conclusion and relevanceTogether with the home care protocol and vaccines, MAb constitute a valid weapon in the early phase of COVID-19 disease. It is an important opportunity because it allows the virus to be faced in an active way, without waiting for the worsening of the patient’s clinical condition, and with a synergistic approach of hospital and territory that join forces against this great infectious disease challenge.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5PSQ-005在临床实践中使用单克隆抗体治疗COVID-19的分析:与疫苗接种一起抗击大流行的武器
背景和重要性疫苗正在成为预防COVID-19疾病的基本工具,但一旦感染,在治疗方面并不是决定性的。抗COVID-19单克隆抗体(MAb)是治疗冠状病毒感染的宝贵并行资源,因此可用于监测使用数据、不良反应(adr)和治疗后住院率。目的和目的本研究的目的是为抗- covid单抗在当前临床实践中的使用提供安全性和有效性的数据。材料和方法使用自制数据库,药房推断并重新处理与当地和医院临床医生招募患者的报告、接受治疗的患者数量、给予的特定疗法(bamlanivimab、bamlanivimab/etesevimab或casirivimab/imdevimab)和医生报告的不良反应有关的数据。与此同时,传染病科监测了在注射单克隆抗体后仍需要住院治疗的患者的百分比。结果大多数招募报告来自全科医生(82%对18%来自医院),从2021年3月到2021年9月,104例患者接受了治疗:48例患者(46.2%)使用bamlanivimab/etesevimab, 55例患者(52.9%)使用casirivimab/imdevimab, 1例患者(0.9%)使用bamlanivimab。67%的患者未接种疫苗,33%的患者至少接种了一剂疫苗(58%:第一剂;42%:两剂)。发现的主要合并症是心/脑/血管类型。在门诊给药后,报告了2例不良反应:输注巴兰尼韦单抗后出现呕吐,在给药后数小时内出现亚急性室间隔前心肌梗死伴急性肺水肿,并出现细菌源性脓毒症。9%接受抗COVID-19单克隆抗体治疗的患者仍因COVID-19而需要住院治疗;其他患者完全康复。结论及相关性与家庭护理方案和疫苗一起,MAb是COVID-19疾病早期的有效武器。这是一个重要的机会,因为它允许以积极的方式面对病毒,而不是等待患者的临床状况恶化,并采取医院和地区的协同方法,联合起来应对这一巨大的传染病挑战。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
4CPS-025 Adequacy of hepatitis B reactivation prophylaxis in patients treated with rituximab 5PSQ-002 Adverse events reported after administration of BNT162B2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare workers 4CPS-126 Real-world persistence with fampridine among multiple sclerosis patients 6ER-013 Analysis of patients’ mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first month of hospital admission 4CPS-199 Evaluation of fremanezumab response in migraine prophylaxis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1