Evaluation of Investment Strategies with Options

Ana Fernandes, C. Machado-Santos
{"title":"Evaluation of Investment Strategies with Options","authors":"Ana Fernandes, C. Machado-Santos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.313978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The financial literature has revealed that option strategies originate asymmetric return distributions, providing new investment opportunities, particularly in the control and reduction of risk. On the other hand, given the inadequacy of the measures based upon mean and variance, we highlight the work of Leland (1999), which proposes a modification of the traditional risk measure (beta) of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) to incorporate other moments of the return distributions. In this context, we applied this methodology on six dynamic hedging strategies with options on the FTSE 100 Index (covered calls at-, in- and out-of-the-money and protective puts at-, in- and out-of-the-money), in the sense of evaluating its performance. The results indicate that the new risk measure is statistically more significant than the traditional beta of CAPM, for that the information supplied by the measure of the performance (modified alpha) seems to be more reliable. However, the values of modified alphas reveal that these dynamic strategies result in excess returns close to zero (as theoretically expected), suggesting that the market price of these options appears to be in equilibrium, i.e., the options seem to be correctly priced.","PeriodicalId":113051,"journal":{"name":"EFMA 2002 London Meetings (Archive)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFMA 2002 London Meetings (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.313978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The financial literature has revealed that option strategies originate asymmetric return distributions, providing new investment opportunities, particularly in the control and reduction of risk. On the other hand, given the inadequacy of the measures based upon mean and variance, we highlight the work of Leland (1999), which proposes a modification of the traditional risk measure (beta) of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) to incorporate other moments of the return distributions. In this context, we applied this methodology on six dynamic hedging strategies with options on the FTSE 100 Index (covered calls at-, in- and out-of-the-money and protective puts at-, in- and out-of-the-money), in the sense of evaluating its performance. The results indicate that the new risk measure is statistically more significant than the traditional beta of CAPM, for that the information supplied by the measure of the performance (modified alpha) seems to be more reliable. However, the values of modified alphas reveal that these dynamic strategies result in excess returns close to zero (as theoretically expected), suggesting that the market price of these options appears to be in equilibrium, i.e., the options seem to be correctly priced.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
期权投资策略的评价
金融文献表明,期权策略产生了不对称的收益分布,提供了新的投资机会,特别是在控制和降低风险方面。另一方面,考虑到基于均值和方差的度量的不足,我们重点介绍了Leland(1999)的工作,他提出了对资本资产定价模型(CAPM)的传统风险度量(beta)的修改,以纳入收益分布的其他时刻。在此背景下,我们将该方法应用于富时100指数期权的六种动态对冲策略(包括价内、价外的备兑看涨期权和价内、价外的保护性看跌期权),以评估其表现。结果表明,新的风险度量比传统的CAPM的beta具有统计显著性,因为由绩效度量(修正alpha)提供的信息似乎更可靠。然而,修正后的alpha值表明,这些动态策略导致超额收益接近于零(正如理论预期的那样),这表明这些期权的市场价格似乎处于均衡状态,即期权似乎是正确定价的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contracts and Exits in Venture Capital Finance Price and Volume Effects Associated with Changes in the Danish Blue-Chip Index - the Kfx Index Market Timing of International Stock Markets Using the Yield Spread Optimal Interest Margin, Deposit Insurance Premium and Bank Size Friendly Takeovers in the UK: An Agency Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1