Moving Forward Together: Reflections of a National Survey of OT/OTA Students’ Perceptions of Culturally Aware Educational Content Delivery

Adair M Sanchez, Iris W Burns, Tina DeAngelis, Maclain Capron, A. Mills, Taylor Kligerman
{"title":"Moving Forward Together: Reflections of a National Survey of OT/OTA Students’ Perceptions of Culturally Aware Educational Content Delivery","authors":"Adair M Sanchez, Iris W Burns, Tina DeAngelis, Maclain Capron, A. Mills, Taylor Kligerman","doi":"10.26681/jote.2023.070102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In June of 2020 in response to the murder of George Floyd and the additional atrocities against historically marginalized people and communities across the United States, the Commission on Education (COE) of the American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) sought to act within its scope. A retrospective survey (N= 1,692) was developed, deployed, and analyzed in accordance with the COE’s standard operating procedures relating specifically to monitoring trends that impact the education of occupational therapy (OT) and occupational therapy assistant (OTA) students. This survey aimed to capture perspectives from OT/OTA students regarding the delivery of culturally aware educational content in curricula provided by faculty. Results indicated that faculty are attempting to deliver aspects of culturally aware content with a limited number of delivery methods. Furthermore, findings suggested the need for rigorous and comprehensive improvements to content delivery related to diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), social determinants of health (SDOH), and intersectionality across the classroom and clinical settings. Implementation of basic instruction, such as lectures/readings, and higher-level processing and application-based materials (i.e., case studies, discussions, role-playing, and simulations) need to be included throughout the entire OT/OTA curriculum experience and are critical to comprehensively educate and equip students for contemporary and culturally informed practice. Faculty would benefit from the development of instructional best practice strategies that expand beyond the delivery of knowledge acquisition. This study aims to lay the groundwork to advance and inform the skills of faculty, fieldwork, and capstone coordinators to deliver culturally aware curricula.","PeriodicalId":304291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2023.070102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In June of 2020 in response to the murder of George Floyd and the additional atrocities against historically marginalized people and communities across the United States, the Commission on Education (COE) of the American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) sought to act within its scope. A retrospective survey (N= 1,692) was developed, deployed, and analyzed in accordance with the COE’s standard operating procedures relating specifically to monitoring trends that impact the education of occupational therapy (OT) and occupational therapy assistant (OTA) students. This survey aimed to capture perspectives from OT/OTA students regarding the delivery of culturally aware educational content in curricula provided by faculty. Results indicated that faculty are attempting to deliver aspects of culturally aware content with a limited number of delivery methods. Furthermore, findings suggested the need for rigorous and comprehensive improvements to content delivery related to diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), social determinants of health (SDOH), and intersectionality across the classroom and clinical settings. Implementation of basic instruction, such as lectures/readings, and higher-level processing and application-based materials (i.e., case studies, discussions, role-playing, and simulations) need to be included throughout the entire OT/OTA curriculum experience and are critical to comprehensively educate and equip students for contemporary and culturally informed practice. Faculty would benefit from the development of instructional best practice strategies that expand beyond the delivery of knowledge acquisition. This study aims to lay the groundwork to advance and inform the skills of faculty, fieldwork, and capstone coordinators to deliver culturally aware curricula.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一起前进:一项关于OT/OTA学生对文化意识教育内容交付的看法的全国性调查的反思
2020年6月,针对乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被谋杀以及美国历史上边缘化人群和社区遭受的其他暴行,美国职业治疗协会(AOTA)的教育委员会(COE)试图在其范围内采取行动。根据COE的标准操作程序,开发、部署和分析了一项回顾性调查(N= 1,692),具体涉及监测影响职业治疗(OT)和职业治疗助理(OTA)学生教育的趋势。这项调查的目的是捕捉来自OT/OTA学生对教师提供的课程中具有文化意识的教育内容的看法。结果表明,教师们正试图用有限的交付方法来交付具有文化意识的内容。此外,研究结果表明,需要严格和全面地改进与多样性、公平、包容(DEI)、健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)以及课堂和临床环境的交叉性相关的内容交付。基础教学的实施,如讲座/阅读,以及更高层次的处理和基于应用的材料(即案例研究,讨论,角色扮演和模拟)需要包含在整个OT/OTA课程体验中,对于全面教育和装备学生进行当代和文化知情实践至关重要。教师将从教学最佳实践策略的发展中受益,这些策略的扩展超出了知识获取的交付。本研究旨在奠定基础,以提高教师、实地工作和顶点协调员的技能,提供具有文化意识的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Communication and Collaboration Among Healthcare Students Experiential Education in Advocacy for Occupational Therapy Students: Didactic Approaches and Learning Outcomes A Framework for Creating and Using Teaching Philosophy Statements to Guide Reflective and Inclusive Instruction Using a Flipped Classroom to Teach Evidence-Based Practice to Entry-Level Occupational Therapy Students Stress, Mindfulness and Occupational Engagement: A Pilot Study of the HOME Protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1