Those who Transformed the Caucasus: Personalities, Institutions, Images

V. Bobrovnikov, Marina Ye. Kolesnikova, Pyotr A. Kuzminov, Yury Yu. Klychnikov, Anton V. Averyanov
{"title":"Those who Transformed the Caucasus: Personalities, Institutions, Images","authors":"V. Bobrovnikov, Marina Ye. Kolesnikova, Pyotr A. Kuzminov, Yury Yu. Klychnikov, Anton V. Averyanov","doi":"10.18522/2500-3224-2023-1-200-264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The processes of integration of the North Caucasus into the political, economic and socio-cultural space of Russia had a deep and long history, reflecting the interaction of various internal and external factors. Those factors were not limited to the annexation of the region to the Russian Empire with the spread of imperial norms and management technologies, but were also accompanied by internal transformations in various fields, overcoming the former isolation of the peoples inhabiting it, the emergence of new industrial and cultural centers, transport hubs, the formation of a single market for goods and services, changes in public consciousness and everyday life. Therefore, Metamorphoses was chosen as the literary allusion of the issue. As in Ovid’s poem various transformations took place in a certain sequence, so the Caucasus has been systematically changing for more than two centuries, and this transit had its own logic, albeit sometimes quite contradictory, with a change in development vectors. Continuing the main theme of the issue, the participants of the discussion focus on the personalities that reformed the Caucasus, those who initiated and carried out these changes, as well as on their reflection in various forms of historical memory. The authorities and individuals who offered their answers in the search for ways to develop the region, both representatives of the Russian Empire, and then the Soviet state, and their opponents, act as transformers. In the collision of various projects with each other and with historical realities, the selection of optimal forms of transformation of the North Caucasus took place. Particular attention is paid to the politics of memory and memorial practices, which make it possible to reveal the relationship between individuals and their historical images, reconstructed using various means.","PeriodicalId":117276,"journal":{"name":"The New Past","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Past","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18522/2500-3224-2023-1-200-264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The processes of integration of the North Caucasus into the political, economic and socio-cultural space of Russia had a deep and long history, reflecting the interaction of various internal and external factors. Those factors were not limited to the annexation of the region to the Russian Empire with the spread of imperial norms and management technologies, but were also accompanied by internal transformations in various fields, overcoming the former isolation of the peoples inhabiting it, the emergence of new industrial and cultural centers, transport hubs, the formation of a single market for goods and services, changes in public consciousness and everyday life. Therefore, Metamorphoses was chosen as the literary allusion of the issue. As in Ovid’s poem various transformations took place in a certain sequence, so the Caucasus has been systematically changing for more than two centuries, and this transit had its own logic, albeit sometimes quite contradictory, with a change in development vectors. Continuing the main theme of the issue, the participants of the discussion focus on the personalities that reformed the Caucasus, those who initiated and carried out these changes, as well as on their reflection in various forms of historical memory. The authorities and individuals who offered their answers in the search for ways to develop the region, both representatives of the Russian Empire, and then the Soviet state, and their opponents, act as transformers. In the collision of various projects with each other and with historical realities, the selection of optimal forms of transformation of the North Caucasus took place. Particular attention is paid to the politics of memory and memorial practices, which make it possible to reveal the relationship between individuals and their historical images, reconstructed using various means.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改变高加索地区的人:个性、制度、形象
北高加索地区融入俄罗斯政治、经济和社会文化空间的进程有着深厚而悠久的历史,反映了各种内部和外部因素的相互作用。这些因素不仅限于随着帝国规范和管理技术的传播而将该地区并入俄罗斯帝国,而且还伴随着各个领域的内部变革,克服了以前居住在该地区的人民的孤立状态,出现了新的工业和文化中心、交通枢纽、形成了单一的商品和服务市场、公众意识和日常生活的变化。因此,《变形记》被选为这个问题的文学典故。正如在奥维德的诗中,各种变化是按照一定的顺序发生的,所以高加索地区在两个多世纪里一直在系统地发生变化,这种转变有它自己的逻辑,尽管有时是矛盾的,随着发展方向的变化。与会者继续讨论这一问题的主题,重点讨论了改革高加索地区的人物,那些发起和实施这些变革的人,以及他们在各种形式的历史记忆中的反映。在寻找发展该地区的方法中提供答案的当局和个人,既有俄罗斯帝国的代表,也有苏维埃国家的代表,以及他们的对手,扮演着变形者的角色。在各种项目相互碰撞和与历史现实的碰撞中,选择了北高加索地区的最佳转型形式。特别关注的是记忆的政治和纪念实践,这使得揭示个人和他们的历史形象之间的关系成为可能,通过各种手段重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Inner Radius” of the Siege of Leningrad: Multiple Localities and Heterotopy of Memory in “The Siege Book” by A. Adamovich and D. Granin The Conservative Anticlericalism of the Engineer De-Skrochowsky Caucasus Wars 18th–19th Centuries and Armenians. The Service of Armenians in the Russian Army as a Social Lift (19th–early 20th Сenturies) Some riddles of archival heuristics “Such was the Time”: V.S. Savchuk on the Fate of Historians under Totalitarianism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1