Trustworthy Certification by Independent Oversight

B. Shneiderman
{"title":"Trustworthy Certification by Independent Oversight","authors":"B. Shneiderman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192845290.003.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The key to independent oversight is to support the legal, moral, and ethical principles of human or organizational responsibility and liability for their products and services. Three common forms of independent oversight are planning oversight, continuous monitoring, and retrospective analysis of disasters. These may be carried out by accounting firms, insurance companies, non-governmental and civil society organizations, and professional organizations and research institutes. Skeptics delight in pointing out that each of these approaches is imperfect, but the evidence shows that overall they are helpful in promoting trustworthy systems by way of continuous improvement to methods and improved training for leaders and staff members. Use of these approaches can be a competitive advantage that is featured in marketing new products and services.","PeriodicalId":159193,"journal":{"name":"Human-Centered AI","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-Centered AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.003.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The key to independent oversight is to support the legal, moral, and ethical principles of human or organizational responsibility and liability for their products and services. Three common forms of independent oversight are planning oversight, continuous monitoring, and retrospective analysis of disasters. These may be carried out by accounting firms, insurance companies, non-governmental and civil society organizations, and professional organizations and research institutes. Skeptics delight in pointing out that each of these approaches is imperfect, but the evidence shows that overall they are helpful in promoting trustworthy systems by way of continuous improvement to methods and improved training for leaders and staff members. Use of these approaches can be a competitive advantage that is featured in marketing new products and services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独立监督的可信认证
独立监督的关键是支持人类或组织对其产品和服务的责任和责任的法律、道德和伦理原则。独立监督的三种常见形式是计划监督、持续监测和灾害回顾性分析。这些可以由会计师事务所、保险公司、非政府组织和民间社会组织、专业组织和研究机构进行。怀疑论者乐于指出,这些方法都不完美,但证据表明,总的来说,通过不断改进方法和改进对领导者和员工的培训,它们有助于促进值得信赖的系统。使用这些方法可以成为营销新产品和服务的竞争优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Do Rationalism and Empiricism Provide Sound Foundations? Introduction: Driving HCAI Forward Summary and Skeptic’s Corner Defining Reliable, Safe, and Trustworthy Systems Teammates and Tele-bots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1