Expert designers’ perceptions about designing using Kansei engineering results

A. Erol, Deniz Leblebici Basar
{"title":"Expert designers’ perceptions about designing using Kansei engineering results","authors":"A. Erol, Deniz Leblebici Basar","doi":"10.5821/conference-9788419184849.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a KE study to determine the emotional design features of a traditional product from Turkey, expert designers’ opinions were collected for the span the semantic space and span the space of properties steps of the KE methodology and an additional discussion came up. It was noted that the expert designers raised several questions about KE. They seemed to approach the potential KE results with caution because it was perceived as an intervention to their creative processes. \n \nDuring the interviews the following arguments came out: Design problems are irrational and wicked and do not have only one solution. What KE offers is scientific, but it may interfere with the creative process needed for designing. It can be useful for novice designers, but some experts think that they already have the intuitive knowledge of Kansei. \nAfter discussing with other KE researchers, about the similar experiences working with expert designers, there was the need to explore the issue in more detail. \n \nFirst, interviews were conducted with 4 expert designers. A scale was developed to assess their attitudes towards using KE results in design problems. Data was collected with an online questionnaire from 59 experts on the scale. The findings can be used in creating new strategies to introduce KE to design experts in a way that they can be convinced to use KE in their further design processes.","PeriodicalId":433529,"journal":{"name":"9th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"9th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5821/conference-9788419184849.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a KE study to determine the emotional design features of a traditional product from Turkey, expert designers’ opinions were collected for the span the semantic space and span the space of properties steps of the KE methodology and an additional discussion came up. It was noted that the expert designers raised several questions about KE. They seemed to approach the potential KE results with caution because it was perceived as an intervention to their creative processes. During the interviews the following arguments came out: Design problems are irrational and wicked and do not have only one solution. What KE offers is scientific, but it may interfere with the creative process needed for designing. It can be useful for novice designers, but some experts think that they already have the intuitive knowledge of Kansei. After discussing with other KE researchers, about the similar experiences working with expert designers, there was the need to explore the issue in more detail. First, interviews were conducted with 4 expert designers. A scale was developed to assess their attitudes towards using KE results in design problems. Data was collected with an online questionnaire from 59 experts on the scale. The findings can be used in creating new strategies to introduce KE to design experts in a way that they can be convinced to use KE in their further design processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家设计师对使用感性工学成果进行设计的看法
在一项确定土耳其传统产品情感设计特征的KE研究中,收集了专家设计师对KE方法的跨语义空间和跨属性空间步骤的意见,并进行了额外的讨论。值得注意的是,专家设计师提出了几个关于KE的问题。他们似乎对潜在的KE结果持谨慎态度,因为这被认为是对他们创作过程的干预。在采访过程中出现了以下观点:设计问题是非理性的,邪恶的,并不是只有一个解决方案。KE提供的内容是科学的,但它可能会干扰设计所需的创造性过程。它可能对新手设计师有用,但一些专家认为他们已经有了感性的直觉知识。在与其他KE研究人员讨论了与专家设计师合作的类似经历后,有必要更详细地探讨这个问题。首先,对4位专家设计师进行了访谈。开发了一个量表来评估他们对在设计问题中使用KE结果的态度。数据是通过在线问卷从59位专家那里收集的。这些发现可以用于创建新的策略,以某种方式向设计专家介绍KE,从而说服他们在进一步的设计过程中使用KE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teamwork in context of diversity A Study on the Relationship Between Decision-making Speed and Kansei Through Data Visualization Visualization of affective information in music using chironomie The relationship between leisure activities and subjective wellbeing among middle-aged chinese people Relationship between behaviors for purchasing OTC medicines and literacy of consumers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1